Uncovering latent profiles of ICT self-concept among adults in Germany and their relation with gender

References

• Antón-Sancho, Á, D. Vergara, V. E. Lamas-Álvarez, and P. Fernández-Arias. 2021. “Digital Content Creation Tools: American University Teachers’ Perception.” Applied Sciences 11 (24), Article 11649. doi:10.3390/app112411649
   Google Scholar
• Arens, A. K., F. Helm, F. Wolff, and J. Möller. 2020. “Social and Dimensional Comparisons in the Formation of German Students’ Language Self-Concepts.” The Journal of Experimental Education 88 (2): 245–264. doi:10.1080/00220973.2019.1635069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arens, A. K., M. Jansen, F. Preckel, I. Schmidt, and M. Brunner. 2021. “The Structure of Academic Self-Concept: A Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration of Central Models.” Review of Educational Research 91 (1): 34–72. doi:10.3102/0034654320972186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., and B. Muthén. 2014. “Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 21 (3): 329–341. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, H. 2017. “The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017.” Science & Technology Libraries 36 (3): 235–273. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, M., U. Keller, C. Dierendonck, M. Reichert, S. Ugen, A. Fischbach, and R. Martin. 2010. “The Structure of Academic Self-Concepts Revisited: The Nested Marsh/Shavelson Model.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (4): 964–981. doi:10.1037/a0019644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretero, S., R. Vuorikari, and Y. Punie. 2017. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of use. Luxembourg: European Union. doi:10.2760/38842.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14 (3): 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoph, G., F. Goldhammer, J. Zylka, and J. Hartig. 2015. “Adolescents’ Computer Performance: The Role of Self-Concept and Motivational Aspects.” Computers & Education 81: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Comunello, F., M. Fernández Ardèvol, S. Mulargia, and F. Belotti. 2017. “Women, Youth and Everything Else: Age-Based and Gendered Stereotypes in Relation to Digital Technology among Elderly Italian Mobile Phone Users.” Media, Culture & Society 39 (6): 798–815. doi:10.1177/0163443716674363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. 2012. “Tablet Technology for Nurses.” The American Journal of Nursing 112 (9): 59–64. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000418927.60847.44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and A. Wigfield. 2002. “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53: 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., ed. 2010. Applied Missing Data Analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esnaola, I., A. Sesé, I. Antonio-Agirre, and L. Azpiazu. 2020. “The Development of Multiple Self-Concept Dimensions During Adolescence.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 30 (S1): 100–114. doi:10.1111/jora.12451.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, S. L., G. Moore, E. W. & Hull, and D. M. 2020. “Finding Latent Groups in Observed Data: A Primer on Latent Profile Analysis in Mplus for Applied Researchers.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 44 (5): 458–468. doi:10.1177/0165025419881721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A. 2013. DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Luxembourg: European Union. doi:10.2788/52966.
   Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., J. Ainley, W. Schulz, T. Friedman, and E. Gebhardt. 2014. Preparing for Life in a Digital Age [IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report]. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, P., A. K. Arens, S. Greiff, and C. Niepel. 2022. “Student Profiles of Self-Concept and Interest in Four Domains: A Latent Transition Analysis.” Learning and Individual Differences 95. Article 102139. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillet, N., A. J. S. Morin, R. Mokounkolo, C. Réveillère, and E. Fouquereau. 2021. “A Person-Centered Perspective on the Factors Associated with the Work Recovery Process.” Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 34 (5): 571–596. doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1866174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnambs, T. 2021. “The Development of Gender Differences in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy in Middle Adolescence.” Computers in Human Behavior 114. Article 106533. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Trigueros, I. M., and C. Yáñez de Aldecoa. 2021. “The Digital Gender Gap in Teacher Education: The TPACK Framework for the 21st Century.” European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 11 (4): 1333–1349. doi:10.3390/ejihpe11040097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., S. M. Hofer, and A. M. Piccinin. 1994. “Analysis with Missing Data in Drug Prevention Research.” In Advances in Data Analysis for Prevention Intervention Research, edited by L. M. Collin and L. A. Seitz, 13–63. Rockville: National Institute on Drug Abuse. https://archives.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/monograph142.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hickendorff, M., P. A. Edelsbrunner, J. McMullen, M. Schneider, and K. Trezise. 2018. “Informative Tools for Characterizing Individual Differences in Learning: Latent Class, Latent Profile, and Latent Transition Analysis.” Learning and Individual Differences 66: 4–15. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus new Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Management Development. 2021. IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2021. https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-digital-competitiveness/.
   Google Scholar
• Janneck, M., S. Vincent-Höper, and J. Ehrhardt. 2012. “Das computerbezogene Selbstkonzept: Eine gendersensitive Studie [The Computer-Related Self-Concept: A Gender-Sensitive Study].” In Mensch & Computer 2012: interaktiv informiert – allgegenwärtig und allumfassend!?, edited by H. Reiterer and O. Deusson, 243–252. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Langheinrich, J., M. Schönfelder, and F. X. Bogner. 2016. “Measuring the Computer-Related Self-Concept.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 54 (3): 352–370. doi:10.1177/0735633115621066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1986. “Verbal and Math Self-Concepts: An Internal/External Frame of Reference Model.” American Educational Research Journal 23 (1): 129–149. doi:10.3102/00028312023001129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., B. M. Byrne, and R. J. Shavelson. 1988. “A Multifaceted Academic Self-Concept: Its Hierarchical Structure and its Relation to Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 366–380. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., O. Lüdtke, U. Trautwein, and A. J. S. Morin. 2009. “Classical Latent Profile Analysis of Academic Self-Concept Dimensions: Synergy of Person- and Variable-Centered Approaches to Theoretical Models of Self-Concept.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 16 (2): 191–225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., A. J. Martin, A. S. Yeung, and R. G. Craven. 2017. “Competence Self-Perceptions.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application, edited by A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, and D. S. Yeager, 85–115. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., P. D. Parker, and R. G. Craven. 2015. “Dimensional Comparison Theory: An Extension of the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model.” In Self-concept, Motivation and Identity: Underpinning Success with Research and Practice, edited by F. Guay, H. W. Marsh, D. M. McInerney, and R. G. Craven, 115–150. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Masyn, K. E. 2013. “Latent Class Analysis and Finite Mixture Modeling.” In The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods, edited by T. Little, Vol. 2, 551–611. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., N. Bach, and S. Oertel. 2022. “Forced to go Virtual. Working-from-Home Arrangements and Their Effect on Team Communication During COVID-19 Lockdown.” German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung 36 (3): 238–269. doi:10.1177/23970022221083698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeusen, C., B. Meuleman, K. Abts, and R. Bergh. 2018. “Comparing a Variable-Centered and a Person-Centered Approach to the Structure of Prejudice.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 9 (6): 645–655. doi:10.1177/1948550617720273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía-Rodríguez, A. M., H. Luyten, and M. R. M. Meelissen. 2021. “Gender Differences in Mathematics Self-Concept Across the World: An Exploration of Student and Parent Data of TIMSS 2015.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 19 (6): 1229–1250. doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10100-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, J., and H. W. Marsh. 2013. “Dimensional Comparison Theory.” Psychological Review 120 (3): 544–560. doi:10.1037/a0032459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., J.-S. Boudrias, H. W. Marsh, I. Madore, and P. Desrumaux. 2016. “Further Reflections on Disentangling Shape and Level Effects in Person-Centered Analyses: An Illustration Exploring the Dimensionality of Psychological Health.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 23 (3): 438–454. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1116077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J., J. P. Meyer, J. Creusier, and F. Biétry. 2016. “Multiple-group Analysis of Similarity in Latent Profile Solutions.” Organizational Research Methods 19 (2): 231–254. doi:10.1177/1094428115621148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., J. Morizot, J.-S. Boudrias, and I. Madore. 2011. “A Multifoci Person-Centered Perspective on Workplace Affective Commitment: A Latent Profile/Factor Mixture Analysis.” Organizational Research Methods 14 (1): 58–90. doi:10.1177/1094428109356476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K. R., D. Hallett, A. Bakhtiar, and C. L. Fitzpatrick. 2019. “Implicit Math-Gender Stereotype Present in Adults but not in 8th Grade.” Journal of Adolescence 74: 173–182. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., and L. K. Muthén. 1998–2017. Mplus (Version 8) [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., T. Asparouhov, and B. O. Muthén. 2007. “Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14 (4): 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mara, A. J., H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, and R. L. Debus. 2006. “Do Self-Concept Interventions Make a Difference? A Synergistic Blend of Construct Validation and Meta-Analysis.” Educational Psychologist 41 (3): 181–206. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasca, R. 2014. “Person-environment fit Theory.” In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, edited by A. C. Michalos, 4776–4778. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2155.
   Google Scholar
• Peiffer, H., I. Schmidt, T. Ellwart, and A.-S. Ulfert. 2020. “Digital Competences in the Workplace: Theory, Terminology, and Training.” In Vocational Education and Training in the age of Digitization: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by E. Wuttke, J. Seifried, and H. Niegemann, 157–181. Leverkusen Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers. doi:10.2307/j.ctv18dvv1c.11.
   Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., and M. H. Bornstein. 2016. “Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.” Developmental Review 41: 71–90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaud, V., and P. Saliou. 2015. “Relating ICT Competencies with Personality Types.” In Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, edited by R. V. O’Connor, M. Umay Akkaya, K. Kemaneci, M. Yilmaz, A. Poth, R. Messnarz, and R. V. O’Connor, 295–302. Ankara: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_24.
   Google Scholar
• Rizun, M., and A. Strzelecki. 2020. “Students’acceptance of the COVID-19 Impact on Shifting Higher Education to Distance Learning in Poland.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (18). Article 6468. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., O. P. John, A. Caspi, T. E. Moffitt, and M. Stouthamer-Loeber. 1996. “Resilient, Overcontrolled, and Undercontrolled Boys: Three Replicable Personality Types.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1): 157–171. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. R. 2012. “Digital Mastery.” International Journal of E-Collaboration 8 (3): 56–66. doi:10.4018/jec.2012070104.
   Google Scholar
• Rubach, C., and R. Lazarides. 2019. “Eine Skala zur Selbsteinschätzung digitaler Kompetenzen bei Lehramtsstudierenden [A Digital Literacy Self-Assessment Scale for Student Teachers].” Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung 9 (3): 345–374. doi:10.1007/S35834-019-00248-0.
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., and J. Eccles. 2012. “Self-Concept of Computer and Math Ability: Gender Implications Across Time and Within ICT Studies.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 80 (2): 486–499. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saß, S., and N. Kampa. 2019. “Self-Concept Profiles in Lower Secondary Level – an Explanation for Gender Differences in Science Course Selection?” Frontiers in Psychology 10. Article 836. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauffel, N., and T. Ellwart. 2021. “Forced Virtuality During COVID-19: A Multigroup Perspective on Technology Acceptance of Public Digital Services.” Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O 65 (4): 244–257. doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauffel, N., I. Schmidt, H. Peiffer, and T. Ellwart. 2021a. Data and Code: Ict-SC25g and ICT-SC25e – Scale Development and Validation [Dataset]. SowiDataNet|datorium. doi:10.7802/2343.
   Google Scholar
• Schauffel, N., I. Schmidt, H. Peiffer, and T. Ellwart. 2021b. “Self-concept Related to Information and Communication Technology: Scale Development and Validation.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 4. Article 100149. doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100149.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerder, A., A. van Deursen, and J. van Dijk. 2017. “Determinants of Internet Skills, Uses and Outcomes. A Systematic Review of the Second- and Third-Level Digital Divide.” Telematics and Informatics 34 (8): 1607–1624. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, I., M. Brunner, L. Keller, V. Scherrer, R. Wollschläger, T. G. Baudson, and F. Preckel. 2017. “Profile Formation of Academic Self-Concept in Elementary School Students in Grades 1 to 4.” PloS One 12 (5). Article e0177854. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze Heuling, L., and S. Wild. 2021. “How Student Characteristics Affect Cooperative Students’ Digital Competences: A Latent Profile Study.” Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training 11 (1): 44–70. doi:10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2111144.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze Heuling, L., S. Wild, and A. Vest. 2021. “Digital Competences of Prospective Engineers and Science Teachers: A Latent Profile and Correspondence Analysis.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 9 (4): 760–782. doi:10.46328/ijemst.1831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamshiri, R. R., C. Weltzien, I. A. Hameed, I. J. Yule, T. E. Grift, S. K. Balasundram, L. Pitonakova, D. Ahmad, and G. Chowdhary. 2018. “Research and Development in Agricultural Robotics: A Perspective of Digital Farming.” International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 11 (4): 1–14. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20181104.4278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., J. J. Hubner, and G. C. Stanton. 1976. “Self-concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations.” Review of Educational Research 46 (3): 407–441. doi:10.3102/00346543046003407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiq, F., O. E. Hatlevik, R. V. Olsen, I. Throndsen, and R. Scherer. 2016. “Taking a Future Perspective by Learning from the Past – a Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments That aim to Measure Primary and Secondary School Students’ ICT Literacy.” Educational Research Review 19: 58–84. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurk, D., A. Hirschi, M. Wang, D. Valero, and S. Kauffeld. 2020. “Latent Profile Analysis: A Review and ‘How To’ Guide of Its Application Within Vocational Behavior Research.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 120. Article 103445. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tein, J.-Y., S. Coxe, and H. Cham. 2013. “Statistical Power to Detect the Correct Number of Classes in Latent Profile Analysis.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 20 (4): 640–657. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. 2000. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion Into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R., Y. Punie, S. Carretero, and L. van den Brande. 2016. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2791/11517.
   Google Scholar
• WEF (World Economic Forum). 2021. The Global Gender Gap Report. Accessed April 11, 2022. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, B. E., N. K. Bowen, and S. J. Faubert. 2020. “Latent Class Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice.” Journal of Black Psychology 46 (4): 287–311. doi:10.1177/0095798420930932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, F., G. Nagy, J. Retelsdorf, F. Helm, O. Köller, and J. Möller. 2019. “The 2I/E Model: Integrating Temporal Comparisons into the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (7): 1131–1161. doi:10.1037/edu0000319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zylka, J., G. Christoph, U. Kroehne, J. Hartig, and F. Goldhammer. 2015. “Moving Beyond Cognitive Elements of ICT Literacy: First Evidence on the Structure of ICT Engagement.” Computers in Human Behavior 53: 149–160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar