Does working memory capacity influence learning from video and attentional processing of the instructor’s visuals?

References

• Alemdag, E., and K. Cagiltay. 2018. “A Systematic Review of Eye Tracking Research on Multimedia Learning.” Computers & Education 125 (June): 413–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. P., and R. G. Alloway. 2010. “Investigating the Predictive Roles of Working Memory and IQ in Academic Attainment.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106 (1): 20–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 1996. “Exploring the Central Executive.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 49 (1): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2012. “Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies.” Annual Review of Psychology 63: 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., and G. Hitch. 1974. “Working Memory.” In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, edited by G. H. Bower, Vol. 8, 47–89. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, S., and C. A. Sanchez. 2012. “Working Memory Capacity and Learning Underlying Conceptual Relationships Across Multiple Documents.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 26 (4): 594–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassili, J. N., and S. Joordens. 2008. “Media Player Tool use, Satisfaction with Online Lectures and Examination Performance.” International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education 22 (2): 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Bleckley, M. K., F. T. Durso, J. M. Crutchfield, R. W. Engle, and M. M. Khanna. 2003. “Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Predict Visual Attention Allocation.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (4): 884–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., and S. Choi. 2014. “Effects of Seductive Details Evidenced by Gaze Duration.” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 109: 131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., D. Wang, and Y. Huang. 2021. Exploring the Complementary Features of Audio and Text Notes for Video-based Learning in Mobile Settings. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and C. Wu. 2015. “Effects of Different Video Lecture Types on Sustained Attention, Emotion, Cognitive Load, and Learning Performance.” Computers & Education 80: 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, P. K., and D. B. Dillon. 2014. “Statistics Anxiety Update: Refining the Construct and Recommendations for a New Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (2): 196–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., and R. E. Mayer. 2016. E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. 1996. “Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: More Evidence for a General Capacity Theory.” Memory (Hove, England) 4 (6): 577–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., and R. W. Engle. 1994. “Working Memory and Retrieval: A Resource-Dependent Inhibition Model.” Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 123 (4): 354–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R., M. J. Kane, M. F. Bunting, D. Z. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm, and R. W. Engle. 2005. “Working Memory Span Tasks: A Methodological Review and User’s Guide.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (5): 769–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. 2001. “The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1): 87–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. 2016. Working Memory Capacity: Classic Edition. Chicago: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., and R. E. Snow. 1977. Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C., and L. Schofield. 2017. “The Video Lecture.” Internet and Higher Education 34: 56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A. G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G* Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., A. T. Stull, S. Kuhlmann, and R. E. Mayer. 2019. “Instructor Presence in Video Lectures: The Role of Dynamic Drawings, eye Contact, and Instructor Visibility.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (7): 1162–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, N. P., and A. Miyake. 2004. “The Relations among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Variable Analysis.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (1): 101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, T. E., and L. J. Elias. 2016. “The Write Bias: The Influence of Native Writing Direction on Aesthetic Preference Biases.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10 (2): 128–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries, L., M. S. DeCaro, and G. Ramirez. 2019. “The Lure of Seductive Details During Lecture Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (4): 736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., and R. E. Mayer. 1998. “How Seductive Details do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (3): 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. L., and N. L. Schroeder. 2021. “A Systematic Review of Instructor Presence in Instructional Videos: Effects on Learning and Affect.” Computers and Education Open 2: 100059.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, B. D., J. L. Plass, and L. Blake. 2008. “The Effects of Video on Cognitive Load and Social Presence in Multimedia-Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (3): 786–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogerheide, V., M. van Wermeskerken, H. van Nassau, and T. van Gog. 2018. “Model-Observer Similarity and Task-Appropriateness in Learning from Video Modeling Examples: Do Model and Student Gender Affect Test Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Competence?” Computers in Human Behavior 89: 457–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. Y., G. L. Chiou, and M. J. Tsai. 2019. “Visual Behavior and Self-Efficacy of Game Playing: An Eye Movement Analysis.” Interactive Learning Environments 27 (7): 942–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., and B. L. Grabowski. 2012. Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. 2007. “Expertise Reversal Effect and its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (4): 509–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. 2009. “The Expertise Reversal Effect.” In Managing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Multimedia Learning, 58–80. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., A. R. A. Conway, M. K. Bleckley, and R. W. Engle. 2001. “A Controlled-Attention View of Working-Memory Capacity.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2): 169–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Y. Choi, M. Kahng, and J. Kim. 2022a. “FitVid: Responsive and Flexible Video Content Adaptation.” CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Y. Choi, M. Xia, and J. Kim. 2022b. “Mobile-friendly Content Design for MOOCS: Challenges, Requirements, and Design Opportunities.” CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., J. N. Bailenson, and C. J. Gomez. 2015. “The Instructor’s Face in Video Instruction: Evidence from two Large-Scale Field Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (3): 724–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., K. Papadopoulos, and L. Sritanyaratana. 2014. Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2095–2102.
   Google Scholar
• Korbach, A., R. Brünken, and B. Park. 2016. “Learner Characteristics and Information Processing in Multimedia Learning: A Moderated Mediation of the Seductive Details Effect.” Learning and Individual Differences 51: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M. L., M. J. Tsai, F. Y. Yang, C. Y. Hsu, T. C. Liu, S. W. Y. Lee, M. H. Lee, G. L. Chiou, J. C. Liang, and C. C. Tsai. 2013. “A Review of Using eye-Tracking Technology in Exploring Learning from 2000 to 2012.” Educational Research Review 10 (88): 90–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liversedge, S., I. Gilchrist, and S. Everling. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of eye Movements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, D. L., A. D. Evans, T. R. Jeffrey, K. R. Palmer, C. S. Wikstrom, and P. E. Doolittle. 2009. “Multimedia Learning and Individual Differences: Mediating the Effects of Working Memory Capacity with Segmentation.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (4): 636–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., A. Jones, T. Denmark, K. Mason, J. Atkinson, N. Botting, and G. Morgan. 2015. “Deaf Children’s Non-Verbal Working Memory is Impacted by Their Language Experience.” Frontiers in Psychology 6 (527).
   Google Scholar
• Mautone, P. D., and R. E. Mayer. 2001. “Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2): 377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2014a. “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. E. Mayer, 43–71. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2014b. “Introduction to Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. E. Mayer, 1–24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2014c. “Principles Based on Social Cues in Multimedia Learning: Personalization, Voice, Image, and Embodiment Principles.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. E. Mayer, 345–370. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., L. Fiorella, and A. Stull. 2020. “Five Ways to Increase the Effectiveness of Instructional Video.” Educational Technology Research and Development 68 (3): 837–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 2003. “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63 (2): 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, Y. Y., and A. Przybylek. 2021. “Instructor Presence in Video Lectures: Preliminary Findings from an Online Experiment.” IEEE Access 9: 36485–36499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noetel, M., S. Griffith, O. Delaney, T. Sanders, P. Parker, B. del Pozo Cruz, and C. Lonsdale. 2021. “Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review.” Review of Educational Research 91 (2): 204–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., A. Korbach, and R. Brünken. 2015. “Do Learner Characteristics Moderate the Seductive-Details-Effect?” A Cognitive-Load-Study Using eye-Tracking. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 18 (4): 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pi, Z., and J. Hong. 2016. “Learning Process and Learning Outcomes of Video Podcasts Including the Instructor and PPT Slides: A Chinese Case.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 53 (2): 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poquet, O., L. Lim, N. Mirriahi, and S. Dawson. 2018. Video and learning: A systematic review (2007–2017). In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Miningonference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 2009. “Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (8): 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, G. D. 2012. “A Review of Research and a Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Detail Effect.” Educational Research Review 7 (3): 216–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, G. D. 2014. “Seductive Details and Attention Distraction - An eye Tracker Experiment.” Computers in Human Behavior 32: 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. A., and J. Wiley. 2006. “An Examination of the Seductive Details Effect in Terms of Working Memory Capacity.” Memory & Cognition 34 (2): 344–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C., and J. Wiley. 2009. “To Scroll or not to Scroll: Scrolling, Working Memory Capacity, and Comprehending Complex Texts.” Human Factors 51 (5): 730–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipstead, Z., T. L. Harrison, and R. W. Engle. 2015. “Working Memory Capacity and the Scope and Control of Attention.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77 (6): 1863–1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, R. E. 1989. “Aptitude-treatment Interaction as a Framework for Research on Individual Differences in Learning.” In Learning and Individual Differences: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by R. Ackerman, P. L. Sternberg, and R. J. Glaser, 13–59. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., L. Fiorella, and R. E. Mayer. 2018. “An eye-Tracking Analysis of Instructor Presence in Video Lectures.” Computers in Human Behavior 88: 263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., L. Fiorella, and R. E. Mayer. 2021. “The Case for Embodied Instruction: The Instructor as a Source of Attentional and Social Cues in Video Lectures.” Journal of Educational Psychology 113 (7): 1441–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1988. “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science 12 (2): 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. L., and R. W. Engle. 1989. “Is Working Memory Capacity Task Dependent?” Journal of Memory and Language 28 (2): 127–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., R. P. Heitz, J. C. Schrock, and R. W. Engle. 2005. “An Automated Version of the Operation Span Task.” Behavior Research Methods 37 (3): 498–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wermeskerken, M., S. Ravensbergen, and T. van Gog. 2018. “Effects of Instructor Presence in Video Modeling Examples on Attention and Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 89: 430–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallman, K. K. 1993. “Enhancing Statistical Literacy: Enriching our Society.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (421): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and P. Antonenko. 2017. “Instructor Presence in Instructional Video: Effects on Visual Attention, Recall, and Perceived Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 71: 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., P. Antonenko, and K. Dawson. 2020a. “Does Visual Attention to the Instructor in Online Video Affect Learning and Learner Perceptions? An eye-Tracking Analysis.” Computers and Education 146: 103779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., P. Antonenko, A. Keil, and K. Dawson. 2020b. “Converging Subjective and Psychophysiological Measures of Cognitive Load to Study the Effects of Instructor-Present Video.” Mind, Brain, and Education 14 (3): 279–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and J. Napier. 2013. “Signed Language Working Memory Capacity of Signed Language Interpreters and Deaf Signers.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 18 (2): 271–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., C. A. Sanchez, and A. J. Jaeger. 2014. “The Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Principle in Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. E. Mayer, 598–620. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. E., M. Martinez, C. Mills, S. D’Mello, D. Smilek, and E. F. Risko. 2018. “Instructor Presence Effect: Liking Does not Always Lead to Learning.” Computers and Education 122 (March): 205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar