Feasibility of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Analyzing Airflow Around Porous Fences

References

• Y. Xu and M. Mustafa, “Investigation of the structure of airflow behind a porous fence aided by CFD based Vi,” Sensors Transducers, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Dong, W. Luo, G. Qian, and H. Wang. “A wind tunnel simulation of the mean velocity fields behind upright porous fences,” Agric. Forest Meterorol., vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 82–93, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. L. Dong, G. Qian, W. Luo, and H. Wang. “Evaluating the optimal porosity of fences for reducing wind erosion,” Sci. Cold Arid Region, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cornelis and D. Gabriels. “Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control,” Arid Environ., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 315–332, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Saskatchewan. “Portable windbreak fences,” [Online]. Available: https://www.saskatchewan.ca/business/agriculture-natural-resources-and-industry/agribusiness-farmers-and-ranchers/livestock/cattle-poultry-and-other-livestock/cattle/portable-windbreak-fences.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wang, E. S. Takle, and J. Shen. “Shelterbelts, Windbreaks, Mathematical, Modeling and computer simulations of turbulent flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 549–586, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Z. Xu et al., “Factors influencing the performance of porous wind shields,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 321-324, no. 1, pp. 799–803, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• W. Synder, “Similarity criteria for the application of fluid models to the study of air polluion meteorology,” Boundary Layer Meteorol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 113–134, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956, p. 315.
   Google Scholar
• B. White, “Laboratory simulation of aeolian sand transport and physical modeling of flow around dune,” Annals Arid Zone, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 187–213, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• J. B. Barlow et al. Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• S. J. Kline, Similitude and Approximation Theory. New York: Springer, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• M. Beyers and B. Waechter. “Modeling transient snowdrift development around complex three-dimensional structures,” Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 96, no. 10-11, pp. 1603–1615, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Blocken. “50 years of computational wind engineering: past, present and future,” Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 69–102, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Bourdin and J. Wilson. “Windbreak aerodynamcis: is computational fluid dynamics reliable?” Boundary Layer Meteorol., vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 181–208, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kumar and A. Dewan. “Computational models for turbulent thermal plumes: recent advances and challenges,” Heat Transfer Eng., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 367–383, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Sun, J. Xu, and Q. Chen. “Modeling of the evaporation and condensation phase-change problems with FLUENT,” Heat Transfer Eng., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 326–342, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• K. Mohammadi and M. R. Malayeri. “Model-based performance of turbulence induced structures in exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) coolers,” Heat Transfer Eng., vol. 36, no. 7-8, pp. 706–714, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Giannoulis, A. Mistriotis, and D. Briassoulis. “Experimental and numerical investigation of the airflow around a raised permeable panel,” Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 808–817, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Andres, F. Wolfgang, S. Wolfgang, and D. Mathias. “CFD modelling and validation of measured wind field data in a portable wind tunnel,” Aeolian Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 315–325, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wilson, “Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak,” Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 119–154, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Bradley and P. Mulhearn, “Development of velocity and shear stress distributions in the wake of a porous shelter fence,” Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 15, no. 1-3, pp. 145–156 1983.
   Google Scholar
• F. Fang and D. Wang, “On the flow around a vertical porous fence,” Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 67, no., 1, pp. 415–424, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. G. Patton, R. H. Shaw, M. J. Judd, and M. R. Raupach, “Large-eddy simulation of windbreak flow,” Boundary Layer Meteorol., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 275–306, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Raine and D. Stevenson. “Wind protection by model fences in simulated atmospheric boundary layer,” Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 159–180, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. T. Trinh, “Additive layers: an alternate classification of flow regimes,” in Quality of Life through Chemical Engineering. Wellington, New Zealand: Chemeca, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J. B. Barlow, W. H. Rae, and A. Pope, Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS, ANSYS FLUENT User’s Guide, Canonsburg, USA: ANSYS, Inc, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• F. Campolongo and R. Braddock, The use of graph theory in sensitivity analysis of model output: a second offer screening method, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Gupta, S. Ray, and D. Chatterjee, “Influence of aiding buoyancy on the suppression of flow separation for power-law fluids around a circular object,” Heat Transfer Eng., vol. 37, no. 15, no. 15, pp. 1267–1279, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar