Publication Cover
Medical Anthropology
Cross-Cultural Studies in Health and Illness
Volume 34, 2015 - Issue 3
2,470
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Technology, Biopolitics, Rationalities and Choices: Recent Studies of Reproduction

REFERENCES

  • Becker, G. 2000 The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Cecil, R. 1996 The Anthropology of Pregnancy Loss: Comparative Studies in Miscarriage, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death. Oxford: Berg.
  • Davis-Floyd, R. E. 1992 Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Fassin, D. 2009 Another politics of life is possible. Theory, Culture & Society 26(5):44–60.
  • Foucault, M. 1990 The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.
  • Gal, S. and G. Kligman 2000 Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gerodetti, N. and V. Mottier 2009 Feminism(s) and the politics of reproduction. Feminist Theory 10(2):147–152.
  • Ginsburg, F. D. 1989 Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ginsburg, F. D. and R. Rapp 1991 The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology 20:311–343.
  • Ginsburg, F. D., . 1995 Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. F. D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp, eds. Pp. 1–17. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Greenhalgh, S. 2003 Planned births, unplanned persons: “Population” in the making of Chinese modernity. American Ethnologist 30(2):196–215.
  • Greenhalgh, S. 2008 Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Inhorn, M. 1994 Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility and Egyptian Medical Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Inhorn, M. 2003 Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion and In-Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.
  • Inhorn, M. 2007 Defining women’s health: A dozen messages from more than 150 ethnographies. In Reproductive Disruptions: Gender, Technology and Biopolitics in the New Millennium. M. C. Inhorn, ed. Pp. 1–43. New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Krause, E. L. and S. De Zordo 2012 Introduction. Ethnography and biopolitics: Tracing ‘rationalities’ of reproduction across the north-south divide. Anthropology & Medicine 19(2):137–151.
  • Martin, E. 1991 The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on the stereotypical male-female roles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16(3):485–501.
  • Petchesky, R. 1990 Abortion and Woman’s Choice: The State, Sexuality and Reproductive Freedom. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Rabinow, P. and N. Rose 2006 Biopower today. Biosocieties 1:195–217.
  • Ragoné, H. 1994 Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Rapp, R. 1987 Moral pioneers: Women, men and foetuses on a frontier of reproductive technology. Women & Health 13(1/2):101–116.
  • Rapp, R. 1999 Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
  • Rapp, R. 2001 Gender, body, biomedicine: How some feminist concerns dragged reproduction to the center of social theory. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15(4):466.
  • Rose, N. 2007 The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rose, N. and C. Novas 2005 Biological citizenship. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. A. Ong and S. J. Collier, eds. Pp. 439–463. Malden, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Teman, E. 2010 Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Weiner, A. 1995 Reassessing reproduction in social theory. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. F. D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp, eds. Pp. 407–424. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.