Racialized Commodities: Race and Value in Human Egg Donation

References

• Almeling, R. 2011 Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1997 Healing the Infertile Family: Strengthening Your Relationship in the Search for Parenthood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2000 The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V. 2014 Misconception: Social Class and Infertility in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birrittieri, C., M. M. Fusillo, and G. Witkin n.d. Oocyte donation. Freedom Fertility Pharmacy. https://www.freedomfertility.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/0527_DonorBook_1009_DonorAssistPrple_FORWEB_v6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bodenner, C. 2017 Debating the ethics of egg donation. The Atlantic, January 26. https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2017/01/egg-donation/514565/
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T., B. Nardi, C. Pearce, and T. L. Taylor 2012 Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 2017 2015 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, E. 2001 Purchasing Power: Black Kids and American Consumer Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. and C. Waldby 2014 Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, L., N. Hudson, and F. Rapport 2013 Assisted conception and South Asian communities in the UK: Public perceptions of the use of donor gametes in infertility treatment. Human Fertility 16(1):48–53. doi:10.3109/14647273.2013.773091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, C. R. and E. Heidt-Forsythe 2012 Gendered eugenics and the problematic of free market reproductive technologies: Sperm and egg donation in the United States. Signs 37(3):719–747. doi:10.1086/662964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deomampo, D. 2016a Race, nation, and the production of intimacy: Transnational ova donation in India. Positions: Asia Critique 24(1):303–332. doi:10.1215/10679847-3320161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2016b Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dieke, A. C., Y. Zhang, D. M. Kissin, W. D. Barfield, and S. L. Boulet 2017 Disparities in assisted reproductive technology utilization by race and ethnicity, United States, 2014: A commentary. Journal of Women’s Health 26(6):605–608. doi:10.1089/jwh.2017.6467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, S. 1999 Ethnicity: Racism, Class and Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fullwiley, D. 2014 The “contemporary synthesis”: When politically inclusive genomic science relies on biological notions of race. Isis 105(4):803–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greil, A. L. 1991 Not yet Pregnant: Infertile Couples in Contemporary America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L. 2016 Brown Bodies, White Babies: The Politics of Cross-Racial Surrogacy. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Lopez, E. 2008 Global migrations and imagined citizenship: Examples from slavery, Chinese exclusion, and when questioning birthright citizenship. Texas Wesleyan Law Review 14:255–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeffel, E. M., S. Rastogi, M. O. Kim, and H. Shahid 2012 The Asian Population: 2010. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, N. 2015 Gamete Donation and ‘Race’. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, N. and L. Culley 2014 Infertility, gamete donation and relatedness in British South Asian communities. In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. F. Ebtehaj, M. Richards, S. Graham, and T. Freeman, eds. Pp. 232–250. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, L. C. 2009 Eggs as capital: Human egg procurement in the fertility industry and the stem cell research enterprise. Signs 34(4):763–781. doi:10.1086/597131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. 2015 Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., R. Ceballo, and R. Nachtigall 2009 Marginalized, invisible, and unwanted: American minority struggles with infertility and assisted conception. In Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and Reproductive Technologies. L. Culley, N. Hudson, and F. van Rooij, eds. Pp. 181–197. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. M. 2017 The price of an egg: Oocyte donor compensation in the US fertility industry. New Genetics and Society 36(4):354–374. doi:10.1080/14636778.2017.1389262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S. 2000 Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, T. 2015 Egg donors challenge pay rates, saying they shortchange women. New York Times, October 17: A1. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/us/egg-donors-challenge-pay-rates-saying-they-shortchange-women.html
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2012 Asian women command premium prices for egg donation in U.S. Los Angeles Times, May 4. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/may/04/business/la-fi-egg-donation-20120504
   Google Scholar
• Marre, D., B. San Román, and D. Guerra 2017 On reproductive work in Spain: Transnational adoption, egg donation, surrogacy. Medical Anthropology 37(2):158–173. doi:10.1080/01459740.2017.1361947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. J. 2014a Reproductive Tourism in the United States: Creating Family in the Mother Country. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2014b The world’s not ready for this: Globalizing selective technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39(3):432–455. doi:10.1177/0162243913516014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. 2017 ‘‘They don’t just take a random egg’’: Egg selection in the United States. In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. A. Wahlberg and T. Gammeltoft, eds. Pp. 151–170. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. 2012 ’I don’t want us to stand out more than we already do’: Lesbian couples negotiating family connections in donor conception. Sexualities 15(5–6):644–661. doi:10.1177/1363460712446271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, A. 2014 Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center 2017 Key Facts about Asian Americans, a Diverse and Growing Population. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Quiroga, S. S. 2007 Blood is thicker than water: Policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness. Hypatia 22(2):141–160. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb00986.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, C. G. 2017 Contracting Our Way to Inequality: Race, Reproductive Freedom and the Quest for the Perfect Child. Lecture presented at Fordham Law School, New York, October 26.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. 2011 Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. F. S. 2016 Resources and race: Assisted reproduction in Ecuador. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 2:47–53. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2016.06.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson, J. 2012 Hemato-nationalism: The past, present, and future of “Japanese blood”. Medical Anthropology 31(2):93–112. doi:10.1080/01459740.2011.624957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, S. 2014 Mother India: Outsourcing labor to Indian surrogates. In Globalization and Transnational Surrogacy in India: Outsourcing Life. S. DasGupta and S. Das DasGupta, eds. Pp. 240–271. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. 1993 With Child in Mind: Studies of the Personal Encounter with Infertility. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A., D. H. Barad, S. Darmon, D. Albertini, N. Gleicher, and V. A. Kushnir 2016 Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of third-party art in the U.S. Fertility and Sterility 106(3):e108–e109. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaje, C. 2000 A place for race? Medical sociology and the critique of racial ideology. In Health, Medicine and Society: Key Theories, Future Agendas. S. J. Williams, J. Gabe, and M. Calnan, eds. Pp. 67–86. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Speier, A. 2016 Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teman, E. 2010 Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2005 Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• ____. 2009 Skin tone and the persistence of biological race in egg donation for assisted reproduction. In Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters. E. N. Glenn, ed. Pp. 131–147. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, P. 2017 Degrees of Mixture, Degrees of Freedom: Genomics, Multiculturalsim, and Race in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar