Making the Ethnic Embryo: Enacting Race in US Embryo Adoption

References

• Almeling, R. 2007 Selling genes, selling gender: Egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material. American Sociological Review 72(3):319–340. doi:10.1177/000312240707200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariza, L. 2015 Keeping up appearances in the Argentine fertility clinic: Making kinship visible through race in donor conception. Technoscienza 6(1):5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 2000 The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G., A. Butler, and R. D. Nachtigall 2005 Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US. Social Science & Medicine 61(6):1300–1309. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, B. and S. M. Dyson 2011 Territory, ancestry and descent: The politics of sickle cell disease. Sociology 45(6):963–976. doi:10.1177/0038038511416159
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, L. 2003 Photographs of “waiting children”: The transnational adoption market. Social Text 21(1):83–109. doi:10.1215/01642472-21-1_74-83
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 2015 2013 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Cromer, R. 2017 Waiting: The redemption of frozen embryos through embryo adoption and stem cell research in the United States. In The Anthropology of the Fetus: Biology, Culture, and Society. S. Han, T. K. Betsinger, and A. B. Scott, eds. Pp. 171–199. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cromer, R.. 2018 Saving embryos in stem cell science and embryo adoption. New Genetics and Society 37(4):362–386. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1546574
   Google Scholar
• Cromer, R.. 2019 Racial politics of frozen embryo personhood in the US antiabortion movement. Transforming Anthropology 27(1):22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Deomampo, D. 2016 Race, nation, and the production of intimacy: Transnational ova donation in India. Positions 24(1):303–332. doi:10.1215/10679847-3320161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorow, S. K. 2006 Transnational Adoption: A Cultural Economy of Race, Gender, and Kinship. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2016 Defining embryo donation: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 106(1):56–58. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, D. 2009 Racial classification in assisted reproduction. Yale Law Journal 118:1844–1898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. 1991 Fetal fascinations: New dimensions to the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood. In Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. S. Franklin, C. Lury, and J. Stacey, eds. Pp. 190–205. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, L., E. Blyth, M. S. Paul, and R. Berger 2011 Conditional embryo relinquishment: Choosing to relinquish embryos for family- building through a Christian embryo ‘adoption’ programme. Human Reproduction 26(12):3327–3338. doi:10.1093/humrep/der313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey, C. W. 2009 Blue-Ribbon Babies and Labors of Love: Race, Class, and Gender in U.S. Adoption Practice. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 2000 Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the Color Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammonds, E. M. 2000 New technologies of race. In The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader. G. Kirkup, ed. Pp. 305–318. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L. 2013 The woman or the egg? Race in egg donation and surrogacy databases. Genders 58. http://www.genders.org/g58/g58_harrison.html
   Google Scholar
• Herman, E. 2008 Kinship by Design: A History of Adoption in the Modern United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homanen, R. 2018 Reproducing whiteness and enacting kin in the Nordic context of transnational egg donation: Matching donors with cross-border traveller recipients in Finland. Social Science & Medicine 203:28–34. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabloner, A. 2018 A tale of two molecular Californias. Science as Culture 28(1):1–24. doi:10.1080/09505431.2018.1524863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. F 1998 Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kawwass, J. F., S. Crawford, H. S. Hipp, S. L. Boulet, D. M. Kissin, and D. J. Jamieson 2016 Embryo donation: National trends and outcomes, 2000 through 2013. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 106(5):1107–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Lyerly, A. D., K. Steinhauser, E. Namey, J. A. Tulsky, R. Cook-Deegan, J. Sugarman, D. Walmer, et al. 2006 Factors that affect infertility patients’ decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertility and Sterility 85(6):1623–1630. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056.
   Google Scholar
• Lyerly, A. D., K. Steinhauser, C. Voils, E. Namey, C. Alexander, B. Bankowski, R. Cook-Deegan, et al. 2010 Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition: Results of a multi- institutional U.S survey. Fertility and Sterility 93(2):499–509. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.015.
   Google Scholar
• M’Charek, A. 2013 Beyond fact or fiction: On the materiality of race in practice. Cultural Anthropology 28(3):420–442. doi:10.1111/cuan.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’Charek, A., K. Schramm, and D. Skinner 2014 Technologies of belonging: The absent presence of race in Europe. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39(4):459–467. doi:10.1177/0162243914531149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N. 2014 This Alabama judge has figured out how to dismantle Roe v. Wade. ProPublica, October 10. https://www.propublica.org/article/this-alabama-judge-has-figured-out-how-to-dismantle-roe-v-wade.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, C. A. and D. M. Saunders 2009 Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertility and Sterility 91(1):140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, J. and N. Dambacher 1997 Making a “real” family: Matching and cultural biologism in American adoption. Adoption Quarterly 1(2):3–33. doi:10.1300/J145v01n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002 The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M. 2006 “Life begins when they steal your bicycle”: Cross-cultural practices of personhood at the beginnings and ends of life. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34(1):8–15. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00003.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, R. D., G. Becker, C. Friese, A. Butler, and K. MacDougall 2005 Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility and Sterility 84(2):431–434. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, R. D., K. MacDougall, M. Lee, J. Harrington, and G. Becker 2010 What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition. Fertility and Sterility 94(6):2069–2072. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omi, M. and H. Winant 2014 Racial Formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paltrow, L. M. and J. Flavin 2013 Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973–2005: Implications for women’s legal status and public health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 38(2):299–343. doi:10.1215/03616878-1966324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, D. 2005 An excess of description: Ethnography, race, and visual technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):159–179. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. 2012 Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Marin, E. and P. Wade 2015 Explaining the visible and the invisible: Public knowledge of genetics, ancestry, physical appearance and race in Colombia. Social Studies of Science 45(6):886–906. doi:10.1177/0306312715621182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speier, A. 2016 Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2009 Skin tone and the persistence of biological race in egg donation for assisted reproduction. In Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters. E. N. Glenn, ed. Pp. 131–147. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services 2017 Embryo Adoption. https://www.hhs.gov/opa/about-opa/embryo-adoption/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Wade, P. 2014 Race, ethnicity, and technologies of belonging. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39(4):587–596. doi:10.1177/0162243913516807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, A. and T. M. Gammeltoft 2017 Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 2018 Enactments of race in the UK’s blood stem cell inventory. Science as Culture 27(1):24–43. doi:10.1080/09505431.2017.1322054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yngvesson, B. 2010 Belonging in an Adopted World: Race, Identity, and Transnational Adoption. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar