Stem Cell Treatments in India: An Ethnography of Regular Practice

References

• Association of Biotechnology Led Enterprises (ABLE) 2012 Indian Biotechnology: The Road Map to the Next Decade and Beyond. New Delhi and Bangalore, India: Department of Biotechnology, Government of India and ABLE.
   Google Scholar
• Baru, R.V. 1998 Private Health Care in India: Social Characteristics and Trends. New Delhi, India: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baru, R.V. 2018 Medical-industrial complex: Trends in corporatization of health services. In Equity and Access: Health Care Studies P. Prasad and A. Jesani, eds., Pp. 75–89. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. 2014 Experimental subjectification: The pursuit of human embryonic stem cells in India. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 79(1):84–107. doi:10.1080/00141844.2013.806947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. 2016 Conceptions: Infertility and Procreative Technologies in India. New Delhi, India: Orient BlackSwan.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, S. S. 1992 Insight and Industry. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, S. S. 2010 The Artificial Ear: Cochlear Implants and the Culture of Deafness. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., and H. Gottweis 2013 Stem cell treatments in China: Re-thinking the patient role in the global bio-economy. Bioethics 27(4):194–207. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01929.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India 2009-2010 Annual Report 2009-2010. New Delhi, India: DBT, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• EuroStemCell 2008-2020 What diseases and conditions can be treated with stem cells? https://www.eurostemcell.org/what-diseases-and-conditions-can-be-treated-stem-cells
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, L. 2006 India’s New Middle Class: Democratic Politics in an Era of Economic Reform. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. A. 2007 Coming soon to a physician near you: Medical neoliberalism and pharmaceutical clinical trials. Harvard Health Policy Review 8(1):61–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin, S. 1997 Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. 2013 Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. 2014 Equity in the utilisation of health care services in India: Evidence from National Sample Survey. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2(1):29–38. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.06.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 2000 A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1):463–96. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasner, P. 2009 Cellular division: Social and political complexity in Indian stem cell research. New Genetics and Society 28(3):283–96. doi:10.1080/14636770903151976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H., B. Salter, and C. Waldby 2009 The Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science: Regenerative Medicine in Transition. London and New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. J. 2010 Quacks in anorectal practice in India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics VII(2):125. doi:10.20529/IJME.2010.045.
   Google Scholar
• Heitmeyer, C. 2017 Biogovernance beyond the state: The shaping of stem cell therapy by patient organizations in India. Medical Anthropology 36(3):202–16. doi:10.1080/01459740.2016.1264945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, B. M. 2018 Brokerage in commercialised healthcare systems: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence from Uttar Pradesh. Social Science & Medicine 202:128–35. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Council of Medical Research & Department of Biotechnology 2013 National Guidelines for Stem Cell Research. New Delhi, India: ICMR, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004 Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order S. Jasanoff, ed., Pp. 13–45. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, B.A. 1988 The technological imperative in medical practice: The social creation of a “routine” treatment. In Biomedicine Examined M. Lock and D. Gordon, eds., Pp. 465–96. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, M., and D. Shipworth 2013 The value of social networks in the diffusion of energy-efficient innovations in UK households. Energy Policy 53(C):159–68. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, I. 2013 Universal health coverage: The new face of neoliberalism. Social Change 43(2):177–90. doi:10.1177/0049085713492281.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, R. 2018 Healthcare corruption: A consumer’s view. In Healers or Predators S. Nundy and K. Desiraju, eds., Pp. 293–310. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC) 2018 National Health Accounts Estimates for India (2015-16). New Delhi, India: NHSRC, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• NHS 2018 Overview IVF. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/ivf
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. 2010 An analytics of biotechnology and ethics at multiple scales. In Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate A. Ong and N.N Chen, eds., Pp. 1–51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patra, P. K., and M. Sleeboom-Faulkner 2009 Bionetworking: Experimental stem cell therapy and patient recruitment in India. Anthropology & Medicine 16(2):147–63. doi:10.1080/13648470902940689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patra, P. K., and M. Sleeboom-Faulkner 2017 Bionetworking and strategic linking between India and Japan: How clinical stem cell intervention continues despite new regulatory guidelines. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 11(3):353–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A. 2015 Ambivalent journeys of hope: Embryonic stem cell therapy in a clinic in India. Health 19(2):137–53. doi:10.1177/1363459314556906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A. 2017 Resituating overseas stem cell therapy. Regenerative Medicine 12(7):743–48. doi:10.2217/rme-2017-0079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosemann, A., and N. Chaisinthop 2016 The pluralization of the international: Resistance and alter-standardization in regenerative stem cell medicine. Social Studies of Science 46(1):112–39. doi:10.1177/0306312715619783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, B., Y. Zhou, and S. Datta 2017 Governing new global health-care markets: The case of stem cell treatments. New Political Economy 22(1):76–91. doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1198757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, D.C. 2015 Concern over private sector tilt in India’s new health policy. Lancet 385(9965):317. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60103-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2005 Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2013 Good Science: The Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S.S., S. Raman, and P. Martin 2017 Regenerative medicine in India: Trends and challenges in innovation and regulation. https://www.eurostemcell.org/regenerative-medicine-society/indias-current-development-and-regulation-regenerative-medicine
   Google Scholar