“Mix or Match?”: Transnational Fertility Industry and White Desirability

References

• Agar, N. 2004 Liberal Eugenics: In Defense of Human Enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2007 Multiculturalism and the promise of happiness. New Formations 63:121–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, J. H. 2015 Desiring biracial whites: Cultural consumption of white mixed-race celebrities in South Korean popular media. Media. Culture & Society 37(6):937–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. 2007 Selling genes, selling gender: Egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material. American Sociological Review 72(3):319–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, R. 2017 Social imaginaries, sperm and whiteness: Race and reproduction in British media. Journal of Intercultural Studies 38(2):123–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziza, A. 2018 Race and assisted reproduction: Implications for population health. Fordham Legal Review 86(6):2811. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol86/iss6/15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. 2013 Race and a transnational reproductive caste system: Indian transnational surrogacy. Hypatia 29(1):113–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G., A. Butler, and R. Nachtigall 2005 Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US. Social Science & Medicine 61(6):1300–09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, S. 2011 Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23(5):600–08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blencowe, C.P. 2011 Biology, contingency and the problem of racism in feminist discourse. Theory, Culture & Society 28(3):3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coovadia, H., R. Jewkes, P. Barron, D. Sanders, and D. McIntyre. 2009 The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet 374(9692): 817–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crush, J., A. Chikanda, and B. Maswikwa. 2012 Patients without borders: Medical tourism and medical migration in Southern Africa . Cape Town: Southern African Migration Programme. SAMP Migration PolicySeries No. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, D. 2013 Surrogacy, gay male couples and the significance of biogenetic paternity. New Genetics and Society 32(1):37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deomampo, D. 2016 Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deomampo, D. 2019 Racialized commodities: Race and value in human egg donation. Medical Anthropology 38(7):620–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deomampo, D. 2013 Gendered Geographies of Reproductive Tourism. Gender & Society27(4):514–537.
   Google Scholar
• Deveaux, M. 2016 Exploitation, structural injustice, and the cross-border trade in human ova. Journal of Global Ethics 12(1):48–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gürtin Z. B. 2011. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 23(5):555–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homanen, R. 2018 Reproducing whiteness and enacting kin in the Nordic context of transnational egg donation: Matching donors with cross-border traveller recipients in Finland. Social Science & Medicine 203:28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, L. C. 1995 The infertile, the too fertile, and the dysfertile. Hastings Law Journal 47(4):1007–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. 2015 Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. M. 2017 The price of an egg: Oocyte donor compensation in the US fertility industry. New Genetics and Society 36(4):354–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht, M., Klotz, M., and Beck, S. (eds.). 2012 Reproductive technologies as global form: Ethnographies of knowledge, practices, and transnational encounters. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, C. 2014 West is best: Affective assemblages and Spanish oocytes. European Journal of Women’s Studies 21(1):57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, C. 2018 Global Fluids: The Cultural Politics of Reproductive Waste and Value. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Laura Mamo. 2005 Biomedicalizing kinship: Sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties, Science as Culture, 14(3):237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhardt, R. 2017 The color of kinship. Iowa Law Review 102:2071–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, A. 2017 Transnational commercial surrogacy and the (un)making of kin in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamo, L., and E. Alston-Stepnitz 2014 Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: New directions in stratified reproduction. Journal of Family Issues 36:519–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. 2007 Eurasian Persuasions: Mixed race, performativity and cosmopolitanism. Journal of Intercultural Studies 28(1):41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, T. 2019 Making a match: Curating race in South African gamete donation. Medical Anthropology 38(7):588–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahman, M. 2006 Materializing Israeliness: Difference and mixture in transnational ova donation. Science as Culture 15:199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Nahman, M. 2016 Reproductive tourism, through the anthropological reproscope. Annual Review of Anthropology 45:417–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namberger, V. 2019 The Reproductive Body at Work: The South African Bioeconomy of Egg Donation. New York and Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist P. 2010 Out of sight, out of mind: Family resemblances in lesbian donor conception. Sociology 44(6):1128–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A . 2014 Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A. 2020 Visa stamps for injections: Traveling bio-labour and South African egg provision. Gender and Society. doi:10.1177/0891243220932147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, A., and T. Moll 2018 Gendered bio-responsibilities and travelling egg providers from South Africa. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online 6:23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parks, J. 2009. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology. Bioethics 23(1):20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiroga, S. 2007 Blood is thicker than water: Policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness. Hypatia 22(2):143–61.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. 2011 Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. 2012 God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2007 The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. 2015 The Race Idea in Reproductive Technologies: Beyond Epistemic Scientism and Technological Mastery. Bioethical Inquiry 12:601–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C. 2019 The Assisted Reproduction of Race. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. A.2018 The assisted reproduction of race. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., and A. Moras 2017 Race matters in lesbian donor insemination: Whiteness and heteronormativity as co-constituted narratives. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40(4):579–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraswati, L. A 2010 Cosmopolitan whiteness: The effects and affects of skin-whitening advertisements in a transnational women’s magazine in Indonesia. Meridians 10(2):15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Seshadri-Crooks, K. 2000 Desiring Whiteness: A Lacanian Analysis of Race. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Speier, A. 2016 Fertility Holidays. IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2005 Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2009 Skin tone and the persistence of biological race in egg donation for assisted reproduction. In Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters E.N. Glenn, ed., Pp. 131–47. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tober, D. 2019 Romancing the Sperm: Shifting Biopolitics and the Making of Modern Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. 2019. International Surrogacy as Disruptive Industry in Southeast Asia. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A.M. 2015 Thai in Vitro: Gender, Culture and Assisted Reproduction. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wing-Fai L.2015. Who could be an Oriental angel? Lou Jing, mixed heritage and the discourses of Chinese ethnicity. Asian Ethnicity 16(3):294–313.
   Google Scholar