Situating the Problematics of Judgment-Based Deselection: A Heuristics and Biases Approach

References

• Baker, Nicholson. 2001. Double Fold: Libraries and the Assault on Paper. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, Colette. 2002. “So many Books, So Little Time.” The New York Times, October 26. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/26/arts/so-many-books-so-little-space.html.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, David, and MalcolmGetz. 1995. “Evaluation of Library Resources in the Field of Economics: A Case Study.” Collection Management20 (1–2):49–89. doi: 10.1300/J105v20n01_05.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, Brian. 2020. The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dilevko, J., and LisaGottlieb. 2003. “Weed to Achieve: A Fundamental Part of the Public Library Mission?” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services27 (1):73–96. doi: 10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubicki, Eleonora. 2008. “Weeding: Facing the Fears.” Collection Building27 (4):132–5. doi: 10.1108/01604950810913689.
   Google Scholar
• Fussler, Herman H., and Julian L.Simon. 1969. Patterns in the Use of Books in Larger Research Libraries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giffin, Meredith. 2016. “High-Yield, Low-Risk Deselection in an Academic Library.” Paper presented at the IFLA World Library and Information Congress, Columbus, OH, August 15. http://library.ifla.org/1571/1/100-giffin-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hendley, Michelle. 2019. “Discovering Data Discrepancies during Deselection: A Study of GreenGlass, Aleph, and Due Date Slips Circulation Data.” Technical Services Quarterly36 (3):233–48. doi: 10.1080/07317131.2019.1621558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, Samantha Schmehl. 2009. “Librarians at the Bounds of Rationality: How Bounded Rationality Can Help Us Help Others.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian28 (3):80–6. doi: 10.1080/01639260903088927.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, Samantha Schmehl. 2012. “Incorporating Decision-Making Concepts into LIS Education.” The Reference Librarian53 (1):4–11. doi: 10.1080/02763877.2011.591688.
   Google Scholar
• Horava, Tony. 2014. “Risk Taking in Academic Libraries: The Implications of Prospect Theory.” Library Leadership & Management28 (2). https://journals.tdl.org/llm/index.php/llm/issue/view/367
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, James K. 1903. “Some Things That Are Uppermost: Address of the President.” The Library Journal28 (7):3–7. https://archive.org/details/libraryjournal28ameruoft/page/2/mode/1up.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Peggy. 2014. Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Peggy. 2018. Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, and AmosTversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47 (2):263–91. doi: 10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, and GaryKlein. 2009. “Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree.” The American Psychologist64 (6):515–26. doi: 10.1037/a0016755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L.Knetsch, and Richard H.Thaler. 1991. “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives5 (1):193–206. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, OlivierSibony, and Cass R.Sunstein. 2021. Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. New York: Little, Brown Spark.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2002a. “Maps of Bounded Rationality.” Prize Lecture, Aula Magna, Stockholm University, December 8, 2002. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/lecture/.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2002b. “Biographical.” NobelPrize.org. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/biographical/
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Canada: Doubleday Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lantzy, Tricia, TalithaMatlin, and JudyOpdahl. 2020. “Creating a Library-Wide Collection Management Cycle: One Academic Library’s Approach to Continuous Collection Assessment.” Journal of Library Administration60 (2):155–66. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2019.1677092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Michael. 2017. The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, Jeffrey A. 2019. “Don’t Visit your Doctor in the Afternoon: Everyone Suffers Decision Fatigue, Even Physicians.” The New York Times, May 14. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/opinion/dont-visit-your-doctor-in-the-afternoon.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lugg, Rick, and RuthFischer. 2008. “Future Tense – the Disapproval Plan: Rules-Based Weeding & Storage Decisions.” against the Grain.” Against the Grain20 (6): 74–77. doi: 10.7771/2380-176X.2627.
   Google Scholar
• Lugg, Rick. 2012. “Data-Driven Deselection for Monographs: A Rules-Based Approach to Weeding, Storage, and Shared Print Decisions.” Insights: The Uksg Journal25 (2):198–204. doi: 10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.198.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, Michael, and AnaGuimarães. 2016. “Applying the Principles of Total Library Assessment to Inform Sustainable Collection Development.” Paper Presented at the Library Assessment Conference. http://old.libraryassessment.org/bm∼doc/33-luther-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, Will. 1996. “The Manley Arts: If I Called This Column ‘Weeding,’ You Wouldn’t Read It.” Booklist92 (13):1108.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, Joseph R. 2018. The Evaluation and Measurement of Library Services. 2nd ed. Denver, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, Alex D., and AllanScherlen. 2017. “Weeding with Wisdom: Tuning Deselection of Print Monographs in Book-Reliant Disciplines.” Collection Management42 (2):76–91. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2017.1299657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale, Christopher, FrancineEgger-Sider, LouiseFluk, and StevenOvadia. 2017. “Weeding without Walking: A Mediated Approach to List-Based Deselection.” Collection Management42 (2):92–108. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2017.1318729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, Paul, and CarylGray. 2005. “Public Relations and Library Weeding.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship31 (3):273–9. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2005.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher, Paul H. 1980. “Managing Library Collections: The Process of Review and Pruning.” In Collection Development in Libraries: A Treatise, edited by Robert D.Stueart, 159–81. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• NobelPrize.org. 2002. “Press release 9 October 2002 Nobel Media AB 2021.” https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/press-release/.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, Brian. 2007. “Cognitive and Affective Processes in Collection Development.” Library Resources & Technical Services51 (1):5–15. doi: 10.5860/lrts.51n1.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, Laura. 2013. “Killing Sir Walter Scott: A Philosophical Exploration of Weeding.” The Library with the Lead Pipe, July 24. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/killing-sir-walter-scott-a-philosophical-exploration-of-weeding/.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, Lindsey, and MeganLowe. 2017. “Into the Weeds: Emotions and Deselection in the Library.” In Emotions in the Library Workplace, edited by Samantha SchmehlHines and MiriamL. Matteson, 100–26. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. (Ebook version consulted)
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Loriene. 1994. “Weeding.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, edited by AllenKent. Vol 54, Supplement 17, 352–98. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Charles A. 1989. “Book Selection, Collection Development, and Bounded Rationality.” College & Research Libraries50 (3):328–43. doi: 10.5860/crl_50_03_328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slote, Stanley J. 1997. Weeding Library Collections: Library Weeding Methods. 4th ed. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Slote, Stanley James. 1971. “The Predictive Value of Past-Use Patterns of Adult Fiction in Public Libraries for Identifying Core Collections.” PhD diss., Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Cynthia Ehret. 2014. “Data-Driven Deselection: Multiple Point Data Using a Decision Support Tool in an Academic Library.” Collection Management39 (1):17–31. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2013.866607.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, Nicholas Nassim. 2010. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. 2nd ed. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R.Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard. 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization1 (1):39–60. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, Kiri L., and Geoffrey Z.Liu. 2018. “Automated Classification to Improve the Efficiency of Weeding Library Collections.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship44 (2):238–47. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Kizer, RichardEntlich, GregoryGreen, PeterHirtle, SteveRockey, DonaldSchnedeker, PatrickStevens, and KorneliaTancheva. 2010. “Report of the Collection Development Executive Committee Task Force on Print Collection Usage, Cornell University Library.” Cornell University Library, Ithaca, NY. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/45424.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, Danny P., Kathleen M.Heim, John P.McLain, and Donald H.Kraft. 1990. “Age Analysis of Public Library Collections: Final Report.” Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Suzanne M. 2015. Rightsizing the Academic Library Collection. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Way, Doug, and JulieGarrison. 2013. “Developing and Implementing a Disapproval Plan: One University Library’s Experience.” College & Research Libraries News74 (6):284–7. doi: 10.5860/crln.74.6.8958.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Lynne B. 1991. “Subject Knowledge for Subject Specialists: What the Novice Bibliographer Needs to Know.” Collection Management14 (3–4):31–47. doi: 10.1300/J105v14n03_04.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Mei. 2019. “What Counts as a Good Selection? E-Book Product Selection in the U.S. Academic Libraries.” PhD diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Mei. 2020. “Rational Actions or Institutional Actions: A Study on the Rationality in Academic Librarians’ Decision-Making Processes When Purchasing E-Book Products.” Library & Information Science Research42 (2):101018. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber, Peter. 2012. “Weeding the Collection: An Analysis of Motivations, Methods and Metrics.” Paper Presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. (Online Version Consulted. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://peer.asee.org/weeding-the-collection-an-analysis-of-motivations).
   Google Scholar