Trait and State Approaches to Explaining Argument Structures

References

• Abelson , R. P. ( 1988 ). Conviction . American Psychologist , 43 , 267 – 275 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken , L. S. , & West , S. G. ( 1991 ). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Auld , F. , Jr., & White , A. M. ( 1956 ). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences . Journal of Psychology , 42 , 273 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron , R. M. , & Kenny , D. A. ( 1986 ). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 , 1173 – 1182 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig , M. ( 1996 ). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology () , 2nd ed. . Cambridge , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brislin , R. W. ( 1976 ). Translation: Applications and research . New York , NY : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. , & Cohen , P. ( 1983 ). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences . Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Crammond , J. G. ( 1998 ). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing . Written Communication , 15 , 230 – 268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman , J. B. ( 1991 ). Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments: A theory of argument structure . New York , NY : Foris .
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton , M. A. , & Mineo , P. J. ( 2002 ). Argumentativeness and its effect on verbal aggressiveness: A meta-analytic review . In M. Allen , R. W. Preiss , B. M. Gayle & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 281 – 314 ). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Hample , D. ( 1990 ). Future directions in argumentation research . In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 298 – 314 ). Prospect Heights , IL : Waveland .
   Google Scholar
• Hays , J. N. , & Brandt , K. S. ( 1992 ). Socio-cognitive development and students' performance on audience-centered argumentative writing . In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing rhetorical education (pp. 202 – 229 ). Carbondale , IL : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hintze , J. L. ( 2008 ). Power Analysis and Sample Size System [Computer software] . Kaysville , UT : Number Crunchers' Statistical Software .
   Google Scholar
• Infante , D. A. ( 1981 ). Trait argumentativeness as a predictor of communicative behavior in situations requiring argument . Central States Speech Journal , 32 , 265 – 272 .
   Google Scholar
• Infante , D. A. ( 1987 ). Enhancing the prediction of response to a communication situation from communication traits . Communication Quarterly , 35 , 308 – 316 .
   Google Scholar
• Infante , D. A. , & Rancer , A. S. ( 1982 ). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness . Journal of Personality Assessment , 46 , 72 – 80 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard , J. , & Wan , C. K. ( 1996 ). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone , B. ( 1996 ). The linguistic individual: Self-expression in language and linguistics . New York , NY : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan , R. B. ( 1966 ). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education . Language and Learning , 16 , 1 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny , D. A. ( 2005 ). Mediation . In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics and behavioral sciences (pp. 1194 – 1198 ). New York , NY : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi , H. (1984). Rhetorical patterns in English and Japanese . Ann Arbor , MI : UMI Dissertation Services.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey , J. C. , Daly , J. A. , Martin , M. M. , & Beatty , M. J. (Eds.) ( 1998 ). Communication and personality: Trait perspectives . Cresskill , NJ : Hampton .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Brashers , D. E. , Winston , L. , & Grob , L. ( 1997 ). Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation . Communication Studies , 48 , 19 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Okabe , R. ( 1983 ). Cultural assumptions of east and west: Japan and the United States . In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives (pp. 21 – 44 ). Beverly Hills , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Onyekwere , E. O. , Rubin , R. B. , & Infante , D. A. ( 1991 ). Interpersonal perception and communication satisfaction as a function of argumentativeness and ego-involvement . Communication Quarterly , 39 , 35 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur , E. J. ( 1997 ). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction () , 3rd ed. . Belmont , CA : Thomson .
   Google Scholar
• Rancer , A. S. , & Avtgis , T. A. ( 2006 ). Argumentative and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Rancer , A. S. , & Infante , D. A. ( 1985 ). Relations between motivation to argue and the argumentativeness of adversaries . Communication Quarterly , 33 , 209 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Read , S. J. , & Marcus-Newhall , A. ( 1993 ). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65 , 429 – 447 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinard , J. C. ( 1991 ). Foundations of argument: Effective communication for critical thinking . Dubuque , IA : Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia , M. , & Paris , P. ( 1985 ). The function of explicit discourse knowledge in the development of text representations and composing strategies . Cognition and Instruction , 2 , 1 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Stewart , R. A. , & Roach , K. C. ( 1993 ). Argumentativeness, religious orientation, and reactions to argument situations involving religious versus nonreligious issues . Communication Quarterly , 46 , 26 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki , S. ( 2005 ). Analyzing structural features of informal argument . In C. A. Willard (Ed.), Critical problems in argumentation (pp. 587 – 597 ). Washington , DC : National Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki , S. ( 2006 ). Gender-linked differences in informal argument: Analyzing arguments in an online newspaper . Women's Studies in Communication , 29 , 193 – 219 .
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki , S. , & Rancer , A. S. ( 1994 ). Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: Testing for conceptual and measurement equivalence across cultures . Communication Monographs , 61 , 256 – 279 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick , B. G. , & Fidell , L. ( 2001 ). Using multivariate statistics () , 4th ed. . Boston , MA : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Thagard , P. ( 1989 ). Explanatory coherence . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 12 , 435 – 467 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggenspack , B. M. , & Hensley , W. E. ( 1989 ). Perception of the argumentativeness trait in interpersonal relationship situations . Social Behavior and Personality , 17 , 111 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegman , C. ( 1994 ). Factual argumentation in private opinions: Effects of rhetorical context and involvement . Text , 14 , 287 – 312 .
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky , D. ( 1990 ). Future directions in argumentation theory and practice . In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 287 – 297 ). Prospect Heights , IL : Waveland .
   Google Scholar