Sexual Goals-Plans-Actions: Toward a Sexual Script in Marriage

References

• Baumeister, R. F., Wotman, S. R., & Stillwell, A. M. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Mongtomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Simon, E. P. (1993). Relationship maintenance strategies and dialectical contradictions in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 225–242. doi:10.1177/026540759301000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1999). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative Research:Vol. I (pp. 35–69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabitating hetersexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210–231. doi:10.1080/00224498909551507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, F. S., & Fransden, M. M. (1990). Strategies of influence in sex and dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 89–105. doi:10.1177/0265407590071005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, F. S., & Kisler, T. S. (2004). Exploring marital sexuality: Peeking inside the bedroom and discovering what we don’t know—but should! In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships (pp. 371–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coffelt, T. A., & Hess, J. A. ( 2014). Sexual disclosures: Connections to relational satisfaction and closeness. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40, 577–591. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2013.811449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLamater, J., & Hyde, J. S. (2004). Conceptual and theoretical issues in studying sexuality in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships (pp. 7–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (2008). Goals-plans-action theory of message production. In L. A. Baxter, & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 65–76). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Anderson, J. W., & Knobloch, L. K. (2002). Interpersonal influence. In M. Knapp & J. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 423–474). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Schrader, D. C. (1998). Reply: On the utility of the goals-plans-action sequence. Communication Studies, 49, 300–304. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368540
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19–38. doi:10.1080/03637758909390247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 150–158. doi:10.1080/00224490509552268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5, 239–261. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S., & Umberson, D. (2008). The performance of desire: Gender and sexual negotiation in long-term marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 391–406. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00489.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N. (2009). “Without flirting, it wouldn’t be a marriage”: Flirtatious communication between relational partners. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 10, 55–60. doi:10.1080/17459430902839066
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). The “how” and “why” of flirtatious communication between marital partners. Communication Quarterly, 60, 465–480. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.704568
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Dillow, M. R., Gaughan, S., & Nordlund, J. (2011). Flirtatious communication: An experimental examination of perceptions of social-sexual communication motivated by evolutionary forces. Sex Roles, 64, 682–694. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9864-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2006). Relationship dissolution following infidelity. In M. A. Fine & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (pp. 153–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. H., & Weber, A. L. (2002). Odyssey of the heart: Close relationships in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Sprecher, S., Pillemer, J. T., Greenberger, D., & Wexler, P. (1988). Gender differences in what is desired in the sexual relationship. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 1, 39–52. doi:10.1300/J056v01n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50, 481–489. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023068.49352.4b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., Braz, M., & Davies, E. (2008). Why do we flirt? Flirting motivations and sex differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 45, 483–502. doi:10.1177/0021943608319390
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R. G., & Miller, R. B. (2004). Marital problems occurring in midlife: Implications for couples therapists. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 405–417. doi:10.1080/01926180490455204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., & Coffelt, T. A. (2012). Verbal communication about sex in marriage: Patterns of language use and the connection with marital quality. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 603–612. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.619282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. L. (2012). Marital communication. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• La France, B. H. (2010). What verbal and nonverbal communication cues lead to sex?: An analysis of the traditional sexual script. Communication Quarterly, 58, 297–318. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.503161
   Google Scholar
• La France, B. H., Henningsen, D. D., Oates, A., & Shaw, C. M. (2009). Social-sexual interactions? Meta-analyses of sex differences in perceptions of flirtatiousness, seductiveness, and promiscuousness. Communication Monographs, 76, 263–285. doi:10.1080/03637750903074701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 409–424. doi:10.1080/00926230591006719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 409–420. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, N. B. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students’ strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 194–211. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00708.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metts, S., Cupach, W. R., & Imahori, T. T. (1992). Perceptions of sexual compliance-resisting messages in three types of cross-sex relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10570319209374398
   Google Scholar
• Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. Communication Yearbook, 19, 49–91.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., Serewicz, M. C. M., & Therrien, L. F. (2004). Goals for cross-sex first dates: Identification, measurement, and the influence of contextual factors. Communication Monographs, 71, 121–144. doi:10.1080/0363775042331302514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montesi, J. L., Fauber, R. L., Gordon, E. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2010). The specific importance of communicating about sex to couples’ sexual and overall relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 591–609. doi:10.1177/0265407510386833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. M. (2010). Human nonverbal courtship behavior—A brief historical review. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 171–180. doi:10.1080/00224490903402520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. (1971). Intimate behavior. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, S. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435–446. doi:10.1080/00224499209551658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., Lachowsky, N. J. & URGiS (2013). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Sex Research, 0, 1–16. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.745473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60. doi:10.1007/BF02701260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permancence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of Human Sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2005). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Stulhofer, A., Busko, V., & Landripet, I. (2010). Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 168–178. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9387-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudel, G. (2002). Sexuality and marital life: Results of a survey. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28, 229–249. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/009262302760328271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502. doi:10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar