2,321
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evidence for the Validity of a Social Connectedness Scale: Connectors Amass Bridging Social Capital Online and Offline

, , &

References

  • Boster, F. J., Carpenter, C. J., Andrews, K. R., & Mongeau, P. A. (2012). Employing interpersonal influence to promote behavioral change. Health Communication, 27, 399–407.
  • Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., Andrews, K. R., & Serota, K. (2011). Identifying influence: Development and validation of the connectivity, persuasiveness, and maven scales. Journal of Communication, 61, 178–197.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
  • Bryant, E. M., & Marmo, J. (2010). Relational maintenance strategies on Facebook. Kentucky Journal of Communication. Retrieved from http://kycommunication.com/jenniferpdf/Bryant.pdf
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54.
  • Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 482–486.
  • Carpenter, C. J., Andrews, K. R., & Boster, F. J. (2012, May). A psychometric assessment of the superdiffuser scales in a health context. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Carpenter, C. J., Kotowski, M. R., Boster, F. J., Andrews, K. R., Serota, K., & Shaw, A. S. (2009). Do superdiffusers argue differently? An analysis of argumentation style as a function of diffusion ability. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45, 151–170.
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873–892.
  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870.
  • Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Eastman, J. K. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 137–147.
  • Gerbing, D. W. (2012). lessR: Less Code, More Results. R package version 2.5. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lessR/index.html
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421.
  • Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York City, NY: Little, Brown.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
  • Hiss, R. G., Macdonald, R., & Davis, W. K. (1978). Identification of physician educational influentials (EI’s) in small community hospitals. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education, Washington, DC.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267–320.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Hamilton, M. A. (1992). CFA–A program in basic to do confirmatory factor analysis. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  • Kelly, J. A. (2004). Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: Resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes. AIDS CARE, 16,139–150.
  • Kotowski, M. R. (2007). A method for identifying influentials within a social network (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest, http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wiu.edu/docview/304843565?accountid=14982
  • Kotowski, M. R., & Carpenter, C. J. (2012, May). A validity assessment of the superdiffuser measures. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Phoenix, AZ.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108–113.
  • McEwan, B., & Guerrero, L. K. (2012). Maintenance behavior and relationship quality as predictors of perceived availability of resources in newly formed college friendship networks. Communication Studies, 63, 421–440.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling along: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Socio-technical capital. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI in the new millennium (pp. 647–672). New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Rogers, E., & Cartano, D. G. (1962). Methods of measuring opinion leadership. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 435–441.
  • Silverman, F. H., & Johnston, R. G. (1975). Direct interval-estimation: A ratio scaling method. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 464–466.
  • Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 163–184.
  • Williams, D. (2006). On and off the ‘Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593–628.
  • Yoder, C., & Stutzman, F. (2011). Identifying social capital in the Facebook interface. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors on Computing Systems (pp. 585–588).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.