Understanding Relationships Among the Dark Triad Personality Profile and Romantic Partners’ Conflict Communication

References

• Asada, K. J., Eunsoon, L., Levine, T. R., & Ferrara, M. H. (2004). Nacrissism and empathy as predictors of obsessive relational intrusion. Communication Research Reports, 21, 379–390. doi:10.1080/08824090409360002
   Google Scholar
• Back, M., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145. doi:10.1037/a0016338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Valencic, K. M. (2001). The biology of communication: A communibiological perspective. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bippus, A. M., Boren, J. P., & Worsham, S. (2008). Social exchange orientation and conflict communication in romantic relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 227–243. doi:10.1080/08824090802237584
   Google Scholar
• Bippus, A. M., Young, S., & Dunbar, N. (2011). Humor in conflict discussions: Comparing partner perceptions. Humor, 24, 287–303. doi:10.1515/humr.2011.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Mikulincer, M., & Austerlitz, M. (2013). A fiery conflict: Attachment orientations and the effects of relational conflict on sexual motivation. Personal Relationships, 20, 294–310. doi:10.1111/j.1475–65811.2012.01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Malis, R. S. (2004). Demand/withdraw communication between parents and adolescents: Connections between self esteem and substance abuse. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 125–148. doi:10.1177/0265407504039843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one’s partner as predictor of the demand/withdraw pattern in marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 66–89. doi:10.1080/03637759909376463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 35–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191. doi:10.1080/08824090802237600
   Google Scholar
• Didonato, T. E., Bedminster, M. C., & Machel, J. C. (2013). My funny valentine: How humor styles affect romantic interest. Personal Relationships, 20, 374–390. doi:10.111/j.1475-6811.2012.01410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPaola, B. M., Roloff, M. E., & Peters, K. M. (2010). College students’ expectations of conflict intensity: A self-fulfilling prophecy. Communication Quarterly, 58, 59–76. doi:10.1080/01463370903532245
   Google Scholar
• Domingue, R., & Mollen, D. (2009). Attachment and conflict communication in adult romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 678–696. doi:10.1177/0-265407509347932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., & Dillow, M. R. (2011). Attachment dimensions and the four horsemen of the apocalypse. Communication Research Reports, 28, 16–26. doi:10.1080/08824096.2010.518910
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 51–75. doi:10.1037/08933200.7.1.57
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Martial processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.63.2.221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1999). What predicts change in martial interaction over time? A study of alternative medicine. Family Process, 32, 143–158. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: When a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 737–745. doi:10.1111/-j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2002). A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce: Exploratory analyses using 14-year longitudinal data. Family Process, 41, 83–96. doi:10.1111/j.15455300.2002.40102000083.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., Bochantin, J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). Humor in high stress relationships: Understanding communication in police officers’ romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 63, 554–573. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.633297
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2011). Is it worth lying for? Physiological and emotional implications of recalled deceptive affection. Human Communication Research, 37, 78–106. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Gallois, C., & Duck, J. M. (2008). The intersection of communication and social psychology: Points of contact and points of difference. Journal of Communication, 58, 749–766. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2008.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. D., & McCroskey, J. C. (2010). Machiavellianism, biological sex, and communication orientations. Human Communication, 13, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Avoiding entangling commitments: Tactics for implementing a short-term mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 606–610. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Kavanagh, P. (2010). The dark side of love: The Dark Triad and love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 606–610. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences. Online First. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 373–378. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. doi:10.1002/per.698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., & Rose, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 572–576. doi:10.1037/t00001-000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432. doi:10.1037/a0019265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, D., Chartranad, E., Simard, M. C., Bouthiller, D., & Begin, J. (2003). Conflict, social support, and relationship quality: An observational study of heterosexual, gay male, and lesbian couples’ communication. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 419–428. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and honesty-humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169–184. doi:10.1002/per.1860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006a). Demand/withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well being. Human Communication Research, 32, 198–216. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006b). Features of serial arguing and coping strategies: Links with stress and well-being. In R. M. Dailey & B. A. Le Poire (Eds.), Applied interpersonal communication matters: Family, health, and community relations (pp. 39–65). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Thweat, K. S. (1998). Aggressive communication traits and their relationships with the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 531–540.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, B. C., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). Narcissism or openness?: College students’ use of Facebook and Twitter. Communication Research Reports, 29, 108–118. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.666919
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. doi:10.1016/S0092–6566(02)00505–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, J. D., & Brandau-Brown, F. E. (2005). Individual differences in the use of relational maintenance strategies in marriage. The Journal of Family Communication, 5, 61–75. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0501_4
   Google Scholar
• Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2012). How “dark” are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884–889. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauthman, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2013). The perceived attractiveness and traits of the Dark Triad: Narcissists are perceived as hot, Machiavellians and psychopaths not. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 582–586. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Chiles, B. W. (2011). Interpersonal conflict: Recent trends. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 423–442). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siffert, A., & Schwarz, B. (2011). Spouses’ demand and withdrawal during marital conflict in relation to their subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 262–277. doi:10.1177/0265407510382061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323. doi:10.1080/0363775000-9376512
   Google Scholar
• The Gottman Institute (2013). Research. Retrieved from http://www.gottman.com/research/
   Google Scholar
• Uebelacker, L. A., Courtnage, E. S., & Whisman, M. A. (2003). Correlates of depression and marital dissatisfaction: Perceptions of marital communication style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 757–769. doi:10.1177/0265407503206003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (1990). Conversational narcissism. Communication Monographs, 57, 251–274. doi:10.1080/03637759009376202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weger, H. (2005). Disconfirming communication and self-verification in marriage: Associations among the demand/withdraw interaction pattern, feeling understood, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 19–31. doi:10.1177/0265407505047835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar