482
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Content and Relational Implications of Children-In-Law's Relational Uncertainty Within the In-Law Dyad During the Transition to Extended Family

, &

References

  • Afifi, W. A. & Burgoon, J. K. (1998). “We never talk about that”: A comparison of cross-sex friendships and dating relationships on uncertainty and topic avoidance. Personal Relationships, 5, 255–272.
  • Afifi, W. A. & Reichert, T. (1996). Understanding the role of uncertainty in jealousy experience and expression. Communication Reports, 9, 93–103. doi:10.1080/08934219609367642
  • Babrow, A. S. & Matthias, M. S. (2009). Generally unseen challenges in uncertainty management: An application of problematic integration theory. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Berger, C. R. & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relationships. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Bevan, J. L., Stetzenbach, K. A., Batson, E. & Bullo, K. (2006). Factors associated with general partner and relational uncertainty within early adulthood sibling relationships. Communication Quarterly, 54, 367–381. doi:10.1080/01463370600878479
  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bryant, C. M. & Conger, R. D. (1999). Marital success and domains of social support in long-term relationships: Does the influence of network members ever end? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 437–450.
  • Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D. & Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage & Family, 63, 614–626. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00614.x
  • Caughlin, J. P. (2010). A multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 824–848. doi:10.1177/0265407510373262
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
  • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing ground theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cotterill, P. (1994). Friendly relations: Mothers and their daughters-in-law. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Donovan-Kicken, E. & Caughlin, J. P. (2010). A multiple goals perspective on topic avoidance and relationship satisfaction in the context of breast cancer. Communication Monographs, 77, 231–256. doi:10.1080/03637751003758219
  • Fingerman, K. L. (2004). The role of offspring and in-laws in grandparents’ tie to their grandchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 1026–1049.
  • Fingerman, K. L., Gilligan, M., VanderDrift, L. & Pitzer, L. (2012). In-law relationships before and after marriage: Husbands, wives, and their mothers-in-law. Research in Human Development, 9, 106–125. doi:10.1080/15427609.2012.680843
  • Fischer, L. R. (1983). Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 187–192.
  • Galvin, K. M., Dickson, F. C. & Marrow, S. R. (2006). Systems theory: Patterns and (W)holes in family communication. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 309–324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hunter, J. E. & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. In B. W. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 4, pp. 267–320). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Huston, T. L. & McHale, S. M. & Crouter, A. C. (1986). When the honeymoon's over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jorgensen, J. (1994). Situated address and the social construction of “in-law” relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 59, 196–204.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guildford.
  • Knobloch, L. K. (2006). Relational uncertainty and message production within courtship: Features of date request messages. Human Communication Research, 32, 244–273. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00275.x
  • Knobloch, L. K. (2007). The dark side of relational uncertainty: Obstacle or opportunity? In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 31–59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Knobloch, L. K. (2008). The content of relational uncertainty in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 467–495. doi:10.1177/0265407508090869
  • Knobloch, L. K. (2010). Relational uncertainty and interpersonal communication. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 69–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Carpenter-Theune, K. E. (2004). Topic avoidance in developing romantic relationships: Associations with intimacy and relational uncertainty. Communication Research, 31, 173–205. doi:10.1177/0093650203261516
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Delaney, A. L. (2012). Themes of relational uncertainty and interference from partners in depression. Health Communication, 27, 750–765. doi:10.1080/104102362011.639293
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Donovan-Kicken, E. (2006). Perceived involvement of network members in courtships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Personal Relationships, 13, 281–302. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00118.x
  • Knobloch, L. K., Miller, L. E. & Carpenter, K. E. (2007). Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship. Personal Relationships, 14, 91–112. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00143.x
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Satterlee, K. L. (2009). Relational uncertainty: Theory and application. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 106–127). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Solomon, D. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50, 261–278.
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Solomon, D. H. (2002a). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 243–257. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00806.x
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Solomon, D. H. (2002b). Intimacy and the magnitude and experience of episodic relational uncertainty within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 9, 457–478. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.09406
  • Knobloch, L. K. & Solomon, D. H. (2005). Relational uncertainty and relational information processing: Questions without answers. Communication Research, 32, 349–388. doi:10.1177/0093650205275384
  • Kreider, R. M. (2008). Improvements to demographic household data in the current population survey: 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Livingston, K. R. (1980). Love as a process of reducing uncertainty: Cognitive theory. In K. S. Pope (Ed.), On love and loving (pp. 133–151). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • McGoldrick, M. (2005). Becoming a couple. In B. Carter and M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded family lifecycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 231–248). New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Merrill, D. H. (2007). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Mikucki-Enyart, S. L. (2011). Parent-in-law privacy management: An examination of the links among relational uncertainty, topic avoidance, in-group status, and in-law satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 237–263. doi:10.1080/15267431.2010.544633
  • Morr Serewicz, M. C. (2006). The difficulties of in-law relationships. In D. C. Kirkpatrick S. Duck & M. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 101–118). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  • Morr Serewicz, M. C. (2008). Toward a triangular theory of the communication and relationships of in-laws: Theoretical proposal and social relations analysis of relational satisfaction and private disclosures in in-law triads. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 264–292. doi:10.1080/15267430802397161
  • Morr Serewicz, M. C. & Canary, D. J. (2008). Assessments of disclosures from in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family privacy orientations, and relational quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 333–357. doi:10.1177/026540750708796
  • Morr Serewicz, M. C. & Hosmer, R. (2011). In-laws or outlaws: The dark and the bright in in-law relationships. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (2nd ed., pp. 217–242). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Morr Serewicz, M. C., Hosmer, R., Ballard, R. L. & Griffin, R. A. (2008). Disclosures from in-laws and the quality of in-law and marital relationships. Communication Quarterly, 56, 427–444.
  • Parks, M. R. & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 55–79.
  • Sharpe, S. (1994). Fathers and daughters. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Solomon, D. H. & Knobloch, L. K. (2001). Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy within dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 804–820. doi:10.1177/0265407501186004
  • Solomon, D. H. & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. doi:10.1177/0265407504047838
  • Solomon, D. H., Weber, K. M. & Steuber, K. R. (2010). Turbulence in relational transitions. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 115–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sprecher, S. & Felmlee, D. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
  • Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L. & Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti H. T. Reis & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 257–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
  • Steuber, K. R. & Solomon, D. H. (2008). Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 831–855.
  • Theiss, J. A. & Knobloch, L. K. (2009). An actor-partner interdependence model of the experience and expression of irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 36, 510–536.
  • Theiss, J. A., Knobloch, L. K., Checton, M. G. & Magsamen-Conrad, K. (2009). Relationship characteristics associated with the experience of hurt in romantic relationships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Human Communication Research, 35, 588–615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01364.x
  • Turner, M. J., Young, C. R. & Black, K. I. (2006). Daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law seeking their place within the family: A qualitative study of differing viewpoints. Family Relations, 55, 588–600. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00428.x
  • Weber, K. M. & Solomon, D. H. (2008). Locating relationship and communication issues among stressors associated with breast cancer. Health Communication, 23, 548–559. doi:10.1080/10410230802465233

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.