Simmering on the Back Burner: Communication with and Disclosure of Relationship Alternatives

References

• Aubrey, J. & Smith, S. E. (2013). Development and validation of the Endorsement of the Hookup Culture Index. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 435–448. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.637246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. A. & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J. (2006, May 15). Me media: How hanging out on the Internet became big business. The New Yorker, 82, 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, S. E. & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M. & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63–79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L. & Drouin, M. (2014). Using modern technology to keep in touch with back burners: An investment model analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 96–100. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R. & Park, H. S. (2012). The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): Reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychological Assessment, 24, 565–572. doi:10.1037/a0026265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., Miller, D. A. & Dibble, J. L. (2014). Ignore your partners’ current Facebook friends; beware the ones they add! Computers in Human Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.032
   Google Scholar
• Edthepoet. (2008, February 25). The back burner dating system. Retrieved from http://www.matchdoctor.com/blog_83362/The_Back_Burner_Dating_System.html
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P. & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men's negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424. doi:10.1080/00224490902775801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E. (2012). Serial monogamy and clandestine adultery: Evolution and consequences of the dual human reproductive strategy. In S. C. Roberts (Ed.), Applied evolutionary psychology (pp. 93–111). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J. O. (2002). The new science of intimate relationships. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G. & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P. & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S. & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L. & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives: How people's trust, personal relationships, and civic and political involvement are connected to their use of social networking sites and other technologies. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hillin, T. (2010, November 13). The back-burner … you can run, but you can't hide. Retrieved from http://www.roaringla.com/2010/11/back-burneryou-can-run-but-you-cant.html
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., Morrison, K. & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66. doi:10.1080/10570310500034154
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, W. C. & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 275–280. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. & Thibault, J. E. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. A. & Gorzalka, B. B. (2002). Asian and non-Asian attitudes toward rape, sexual harassment, and sexuality. Sex Roles, 46, 227–238. doi:10.1023/A:1020145815129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Teens-and-Sexting.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A. & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Kim, R. K. & Hamel, L. M. (2010). People lie for a reason: Three experiments documenting the principle of veracity. Communication Research Reports, 27, 271–285. doi:10.1080/08824096.2010.496334
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., Atkins, D. C., Blayney, J. A., Dent, D. V. & Kaysen, D. L. (2012). What is hooking up? Examining definitions of hooking up in relation to behavior and normative perceptions. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 757–766. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.706333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, R. & Baron, N. S. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 291–298. doi:10.1177/0261927X06303480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippard, P. V. (1988). “Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies”: Situational exigencies for interpersonal deception. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Married Jake. (2009, September 25). Do you have a back burner? Retrieved from http://www.glamour.com/sex-love-life/blogs/smitten/2009/09/do-you-have-a-back-burner.html
   Google Scholar
• Meston, C. M., Trapnell, P. D. & Gorzalka, B. B. (1998). Ethnic, gender, and length-of-residency influences on sexual knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 176–188. doi:10.1080/00224499809551931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midlifebachelor.com (2008, September 1). Front burner, back burner dating strategy. Retrieved from http://www.midlifebachelor.com/articles/frontburnerbackburner.html
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, L. F. & Ronis, S. T. (2013). Virtual cheating hearts: Extradyadic and poaching interactions among adolescents with links to online sexual activities. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45, 175–184. doi:10.1037/a0031683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B. & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A. & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2011). Americans and text messaging. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/Americans%20and%20Text%20Messaging.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S. & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 533–542. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9974-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705–713. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M. & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traugott, M., Joo, S. H., Ling, R. & Qian, Y. (2006). On the move: The role of cellular communication in American life. Pohs Report on Mobile Communication. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Wentland, J. J. & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20, 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• West, A. R. (2013). Relationship commitment and monitoring alternatives using Facebook in unmarried romantic relationships (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/21578
   Google Scholar
• Yost, M. R. & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit sexual motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 163–173. doi:10.1080/00224490609552311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar