How Social Context Cues in Online Support-Seeking Influence Self-Disclosure in Support Provision

References

• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: Development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt McDougal.
   Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2011). The effects of other-generated and system-generated cues on adolescents’ perceived attractiveness on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 391–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. L. (1980). Self-disclosure. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.), The self in social psychology (pp. 183–205). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1867–1883. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, A., & Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 407–417. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9938
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbee, A. P., Cunningham, M. R., Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J., Gulley, M. R., Yankeelov, P. A., & Druen, P. B. (1993). Effects of gender role expectations on the social support process. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 175–190. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bente, G., Ruggenberg, S., Kramer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34, 287–318. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1988). Uncertainty and information exchange in developing relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 239–256). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456–480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, T. O., Schmidt, S. D., Vangsness, S. A., Monteiro, A. K., & Santagata, P. V. (2010). Differences among breast and prostate cancer online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1400–1404. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103–124. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1302_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. The Journal of Business Communication, 34, 99–120. doi:10.1177/002194369703400106
   Google Scholar
• Chuah, J. H., Robb, A., White, C., Wendling, A., Lampotang, S., Kopper, R., & Lok, B. (2013). Exploring agent physicality and social presence for medical team training. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 22, 141–170. doi:10.1162/pres_a_00145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.116.3.457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. S., Buchanan, H., & Aubeeluck, A. (2007). Social support in cyberspace: A content analysis of communication within a Huntington’s disease online support group. Patient Education and Counseling, 68, 173–178. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E., Suhr, J. A., & MacFarlane, R. (1990). Interpersonal transactions and the psychological sense of support. In S. Duck & R. Silver (Eds.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 30–45). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2007). The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-service environments. Interacting with Computers, 19, 43–56. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derlega, V., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2006). Exploring the support-seeking process across cultures: Toward an integrated analysis of similarities and differences. In M. P. Orbe B. J. Allen & L. A. Flores (Eds.), International and intercultural communication annual, 28 (pp. 243–266). Newsbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, B., Li, S., & Li, N. (2013). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650213510942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwood, C., & Wootton, N. (2009). Comforting communication in an online epilepsy forum. Journal of CyberTherapy and Rehabilitation, 2, 159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D., & Parks, M. (1990). Communication strategies for managing the risks of seeking social support. In S. Duck & R. Silver (Eds.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 104–121). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409–427). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73, 40–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. http://www.guilford.com/
   Google Scholar
• Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 262–271.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). “I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life”: Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society, 6, 487–506. doi:10.1177/146144804044331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2001). Self-disclosure. Psychotherapy, 38, 413–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 125–146. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 379–403. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9507312923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., & Dumas, F. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011–1025. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x. Retrieved February 2, 2014 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192. doi:10.1002/ejsp.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N., Ulf-Dietrich, R., Buchanan, T., & Schofield, C. B. P. (2010). Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 1–24. doi:10.1080/07370020903586662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187–213. doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00019-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., & Gratch, J. (2011). People like virtual counselors that highly-disclose about themselves. The Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 167, 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.39.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 155–172. doi:10.1089/109493104323024429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, N., & Benbasat, I. (2002). Para-social presence: A re-conceptualization of “social presence” to capture the relationship between a web site and her visitors. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., & Jang, J.-W. (2013). Not so imaginary interpersonal contact with public figures on social network sites: How affiliative tendency moderates its effects. Communication Research, 40, 27–51. doi:10.1177/0093650211431579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.-M., & Nass, C. (2005). Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychology, 7, 31–45. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In B. Bunker & J. Rubins (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation and justice (pp. 133–173). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2008). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 252–275. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
   Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681–694. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S. (2012). Is online trust and trust in social institutions associated with online disclosure of identifiable information online? Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1471–1477. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S., & Beker, G. (2010). Are norms of disclosure of online and offline personal information associated with the disclosure of personal information online? Human Communication Research, 36, 570–592. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, P. K. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2008). Exploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: A content analysis of messages posted to an online HIV/AIDS support group. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 371–374. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrow, P. R. (2006). Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: Some discourse features. Discourse Studies, 8, 531–548. doi:10.1177/1461445606061876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson, S. T. (2009). Interpersonal trust and social skill in seeking social support among Chinese and Americans. Communication Research, 36, 32–53. doi:10.1177/0093650208326460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. L. (1978). Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 72–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ommen, O., Janssen, C., Neugebauer, E., Bouillon, B., Rehm, K., Rangger, C. … Pfaff, H. (2008). Trust, social support and patient type--associations between patients perceived trust, supportive communication and patients preferences in regard to paternalism, clarification and participation of severely injured patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 196–204. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B. (2005, May). Masspersonal communication: Rethinking the mass interpersonal divide. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35, 309–336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratan, R. A., Chung, J. E., Shen, C., Williams, D., & Poole, M. S. (2010). Schmoozing and smiting: trust, social institutions and communication patterns in an MMOG. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 93–114. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollman, B., & Parente, F. (2001). Relation of statement length and type and type of chat room reciprocal communication on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 617–622. doi:10.1089/109493101753235214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rollman, J. B., Krug, K., & Parente, F. (2000). The chat room phenomenon: Reciprocal communication in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 161–166. doi:10.1089/109493100316003
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Steed, A. (2002). Meeting people virtually: Experiments in shared virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 145–171). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J., Sharkey, S., Hewis, E., Jones, R., Emmens, T., Ford, T., & Owens, C. (2011). Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Studies, 13, 487–501. doi:10.1177/1461445611403356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492–1513. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, J. L. (1991). Interpersonal correlates of trust and self-disclosure. Psychological Reports, 68, 1319–1320. doi:10.2466/pr0.68.4.1319-1320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, V., Lepkowska-White, E., & Rao, B. P. (1999). Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? An investigation of factors influencing electronic exchange. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5, 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00335.x
   Google Scholar
• Taddei, S., & Contena, B. (2013). Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 821–826. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M. (2008). Health-related on-line forums: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 13, 698–714. doi:10.1080/10810730802415316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 413–424. doi:10.1002/ejsp.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2007). Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 955–970. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. D. (2011). Avatars and emotional engagement in asynchronous online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 207–212. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichon, J., & Shapiro, M. (2003). The process of sharing social support in cyberspace. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 161–170. doi:10.1089/109493103321640356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of our relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 443–479). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp 153–188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828–846. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. D., & Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 105–125. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3, 250–257. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x
   Google Scholar
• Won-Doornink, M. J. (1985). Self-disclosure and reciprocity in conversation: A cross-national study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 97–107. doi:10.2307/3033605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (2000). Perceptions of on‐line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on‐line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48, 44–59. doi:10.1080/01463370009385579
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (2002). Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support, perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. B., & Bell, S. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings of social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 39–54. doi:10.1177/1359105303008001429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B. (2008). Multimodal computer-mediated communication and social support among older Chinese Internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 728–750. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Veinott, E., Bos, N., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (2002). Trust without touch: Jumpstarting trust with initial social activities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 141–146). Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar