When Do Students Benefit From Performance Feedback? A Test of Feedback Intervention Theory in Speaking Improvement

References

• Arundale, R. B. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, face work, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2078–2105. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Mladenovic, R., & Price, M. (2013). Students perceptions of the usefulness of marking guides, grade descriptors and annotated exemplars. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 769–788. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.714738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, M. (1989). The interpretation of classroom performance feedback: An attributional approach. Communication Education, 38, 119–131. doi:10.1080/03634528909378745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence E. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., Housley Gaffney, A. L., & Martin, K. N. (2011). Students’ talk about the climate of feedback interventions in the critique. Communication Education, 60, 95–114. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.487111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnell, D. K. (1978). Some “basics” to get back to: A transactional perspective on teaching-learning. Communication Education, 27, 277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (1990). Sensitivity to feedback and the development of self. Communication Quarterly, 38, 101–111. doi:10.1080/01463379009369747
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Pledger, L. (1990). Development and validation of the sensitivity to feedback scale. Communication Research Reports, 7, 83–89. doi:10.1080/08824099009359859
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, K. D., & Millis, M. A. (1993). On conceptual, theoretical and empirical treatments of feedback in human communication: Fifteen years later. Communication Reports, 6, 79–91. doi:10.1080/08934219309367568
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, D., & Linnehan, F. (1996). Exploring the dimensionality of positive and negative performance feedback. Communication Quarterly, 44, 326–344. doi:10.1080/01463379609370021
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, N. R., & Griffin, C. J. G. (1995). The meaning of grades based on faculty and student metaphors. Communication Education, 44, 110–125. doi:10.1080/03634529509379003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, B. W. (2004). Grading leniency, grade discrepancy, and student ratings of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 410–425. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., Coleman, L., & Nassau, S. R. (1989). Reactions to interpersonal evaluative feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 862–884. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Ferrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., Hess, J. A., & Trees, A. R. (2003). Sustaining the desire to learn: Dimensions of perceived instructional face work related to student involvement and motivation to learn. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 357–381. doi:10.1080/10570310309374779
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., Trees, A. R., & Hess, J. A. (2008). Attentive face work during instructional feedback: Key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment. Communication Education, 57, 312–332. doi:10.1080/03634520802027347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. J. (2009). The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 235–261. doi:10.1080/03634520802515705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Young, M. J., & Behnke, R. R. (2000). Public speaking performance improvement as a function of information processing in immediate and delayed feedback interventions. Communication Education, 49, 365–374. doi:10.1080/03634520009379224
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N. (2001). Feeback-expectation discrepancy, arousal and locus of cognition. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 111–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3), 67–72. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Mottet, T. P. (2011). The effect of instructor nonverbal immediacy behaviors and feedback sensitivity on Hispanic students’ affective learning outcomes in ninth-grade writing conferences. Communication Education, 60, 1–19. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.496868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkin, R. S. (2006). Power distance and face work strategies. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35, 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P. (2008). Teacher feedback. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication ( Vol. XI, pp. 4976–4980). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, B. L., & Nyquist, J. L. (1992). Using video technology to provide feedback to students in performance courses. Communication Education, 41, 324–334. doi:10.1080/03634529209378892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabee, C., & Wilson, S. R. (2005). Students’ primary goals, attributions, and face work during conversations about disappointing grades. Communication Education, 54, 185–204. doi:10.1080/03634520500356154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. D., & King, P. E. (2004). Student feedback sensitivity and the efficacy of feedback interventions in public speaking performance improvement. Communication Education, 53, 203–216. doi:10.1080/0363452042000265152
   Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009). Earning influence by communicating respect: Facework’s contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 397–416. doi:10.1080/03634520802613419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. R. (1992). Face and face work in negotiation. In L. Putnam & M. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 176–205). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of face work and immediacy on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Education, 60, 75–94. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.507820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar