Exploring Subtext Processing in Narrative Persuasion: The Role of Eudaimonic Entertainment-Use Motivation and a Supplemental Conclusion Scene

References

• Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13, 101–135. doi:10.1080/15213261003799847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barriga, C. A., Shapiro, M. A., & Fernandez, M. L. (2010). Science information in fictional movies: Effects of context and gender. Science Communication, 32, 3–24. doi:10.1177/1075547009340338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. (1986). Distraction during persuasive communication: A meta-analytic review. Communication Monographs, 53, 91–114. doi:10.1080/03637758609376130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D., & Hall, J. R. (1998). The effects of distraction during persuasion. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 155–174). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L., & Hoffner, C. (2013). Gifts of giving: The role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults’ decisions to become organ donors. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 128–138. doi:10.1177/1359105311433910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, S. M., Kashima, Y., & Wakefield, M. (2010). Predictors and consequences of conversations about health promoting media messages. Communication Monographs, 77, 518–539. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.502537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Process theories of attitude formation and change: The elaboration likelihood and heuristic-systematic models. In A. H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes (pp. 303–350). Orlando FL:, Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. E., Movius, L., & Cody, M. J. (2009). The power of narratives: The effect of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and nondonors. Journal of Communication, 59, 135–151. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. E., Stephenson, M. T., Harrison, T. R., Afifi, W. A., & Long, S. D. (2008). Facts versus “feelings”: How rational is the decision to become an organ donor? Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 644–658. doi:10.1177/1359105308090936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movius, L., Cody, M., Huang, G., Berkowitz, M., & Morgan, S. (2007). Motivating television viewers to become organ donors. Cases in Public Health Communication & Marketing, 1. Retrieved from http://www.casesjournal.org/volume1/peer-reviewed/cases_1_08.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H., & Jain, P. (2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61, 387–406. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Kim, H. K., Lundell, H., Fazili, F., & Frazier, B. (2012). Beyond counterarguing: Simple elaboration, complex integration, and counterelaboration in response to variations in narrative focus and sidedness. Journal of Communication, 62, 758–777. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2008). Tender affective states as predictors of entertainment preference. Journal of Communication, 58, 40–61. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984–1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). “Get up and win!” Participatory responses to narrative. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., Cody, M., Rogers, E., & Sabido, M. (Eds.). (2004). Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1989). Prosocial television for development in India. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 331–350). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (1997). Persuasion processes across receiver goals and message genres. Communication Theory, 7, 125–148. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2002a). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2002b). Involvement as goal-directed strategic processing: Extending the elaboration likelihood model. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 175–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. doi:10.1093/ct/12.2.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235–252. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Futon Critic. (2006). CBS places first in viewers for the 17th time in 19 weeks. Retrieved from http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=20060131cbs02
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. L. (1973). The cognitive processes mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 53–62. doi:10.2307/3149409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. Communication Yearbook, 23, 103–123.
   Google Scholar