Economic Sectors as Discursive Resources for Civil Society Collaboration

References

• Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64. doi:10.1080/19416520903047186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69–97. doi:10.1177/089976400773746346
   Google Scholar
• Berger, I., Cunningham, P., & Drumwright, M. (2004). Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47(1), 58–90. doi:10.2307/41166287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummans, B. H., Putnam, L. L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75(1), 25–51. doi:10.1080/03637750801952735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Stone, M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, R. (1992). Survival of the nonprofit spirit in a for-profit world. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(4), 391–410. doi:10.1177/089976409202100406
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2001). Translation and articulation in the organization of coalitions: The Great Whale River case. Communication Theory, 11(2), 178–200. doi:10.1111/comt.2001.11.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. doi:10.1111/comt.1999.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (1995). Representational practices and the political analysis of corporations: Building a communication perspective in organizational studies. In B. Kovacic (Ed.), New approaches to organizational communication (pp. 211–243). New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M. A., & Dougherty, D. S. (2010). Managing the multiple meanings of organizational culture in interdisciplinary collaboration and consulting. Journal of Business Communication, 47(1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/0021943609355790
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M. (1995). A communication perspective on interorganizational cooperation and inner-city education. In M. C. R. L. C. Rigsby & M. C. Wang (Eds.), School-community connections: Exploring issues for research and practice (pp. 101–119). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finet, D. (1993). Effects of boundary spanning communication on the sociopolitical delegitimation of an organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(1), 36–66.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 389–415. doi:10.1177/0899764006295997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2000). Assessing interorganizational collaboration: Multiple conceptions and multiple methods. In D. O. Faulkener & M. DeRond (Eds.), Cooperative strategy: Economic, business, and organizational issues (pp. 243–260). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T., & Phillips, N. (1998). Talking action: Conversations, narrative and action in interorganizational collaboration. In D. Grant, T. Keenoy, & C. Oswick (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 65–83). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T., & Phillips, N. (2006). Swimming with sharks: Creating strategic change through multi-sector collaboration. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 1(1/2), 96–112. doi:10.1504/IJSCM.2006.011105
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, L., & Krone, K. (2001). The boundary-spanning role of a cooperative support organization: Managing the paradox of stability and change in non-traditional organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(3), 248–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G. (2007). Rethinking community collaboration through a dialogic lens: Creativity, democracy, and diversity in community organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 145–171. doi:10.1177/0893318907306032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G., & Sias, P. M. (1999). Communicating spirit in a collaborative alliance. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 356–376. doi:10.1080/00909889909365545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. L., & Frey, L. R. (2004). Ideal collaboration: A conceptual framework of community collaboration. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook (vol. 24, pp. 189–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell, M. G. (2012). The role of boundary spanners as the interorganizational link in nonprofit collaborating. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 159–165. doi:10.1177/0893318911423641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyton, J., Ford, D. J., & Smith, F. (2008). A mesolevel communicative model of collaboration. Communication Theory, 18(3), 376–406. doi:10.1111/comt.2008.18.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyton, J., & Stallworth, V. (2003). On the verge of collaboration: Interaction processes versus group outcomes. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (pp. 235–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M., Kuhn, T., & Pfarrer, M. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross- sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332–354. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2003). Corporate scandal and the theory of the firm formulating the contributions of organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 20–57. doi:10.1177/0893318903253421
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (1999). Watching whale watching: Exploring the discursive foundations of collaborative relationships. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(4), 479–502. doi:10.1177/0021886399354008
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K. (2006). Collaboration: Review of communication scholarship and a research agenda. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook (vol. 30, pp. 197–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (vol. 75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to terms with the public-private partnership: A grammar of multiple meanings. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 35–51. doi:10.1177/00027649921955146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, D. T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2010). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loza, J. (2004). Business–community partnerships: The case for community organization capacity building. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 297–311. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039415.90007.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund-Thomsen, P. (2008). The global sourcing and codes of conduct debate: Five myths and five recommendations. Development and Change, 39, 1005–1018. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., & Zadek, S. (2000). Partnership alchemy: new social partnerships in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.copenhagencentre.org
   Google Scholar
• Palmeri, J., & Tuten, P. M. (2005). Dialogic negotiations: A reflective tale of collaboration across the academic-practitioner divide. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(3), 313–323. doi:10.1109/TPC.2005.853939
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B., & Selsky, J. W. (2004). Interface dynamics in cause-based partnerships: An exploration of emergent culture. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 458–488. doi:10.1177/0899764004266016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud, G. (2000). The symphony: Organizational discourse and the symbolic tensions between artistic and business ideologies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(2), 117–143. doi:10.1080/00909880009365559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitanidi, M. (2008). Adaptive responsibilities: Nonlinear interactions in cross sector social partnerships. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 10(3), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Selsky, J., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873. doi:10.1177/0149206305279601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson Jr, M., & Schnitzer, M. H. (2006). Interorganizational trust, boundary spanning, and humanitarian relief coordination. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, C., & Walker, K. (2002). A bona fide perspective for the future of groups: Understanding collaborating groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions for group communication (pp. 237–252). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2000). Exploring the effects of collaborations on member organizations: Washington country’s welfare-to-work partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 98–119. doi:10.1177/089976400773746355
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, L. M., & Smutny, G. (2002). Collaborative windows and organizational governance: Exploring the formation and demise of social service partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 165–185. doi:10.1177/08964002031002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, M., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4), 447–464. doi:10.1177/0021886301374004
   Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Waddock, S. A. (1989). Understanding social partnerships: An evolutionary model of partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 21(1), 78–100. doi:10.1177/009539978902100105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddock, S. A. (1991). A typology of social partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 22, 480–515. doi:10.1177/009539979102200405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 595–621. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, M., & Chen, X. P. (2003). Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28, 587–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, H. M. (2000). “A place you haven’t visited before”: Creating the conditions for community dialogue. Southern Communication Journal, 65(2–3), 191–207. doi:10.1080/10417940009373167
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, H. M. (2004). Dialogue as global issue management: Legitimizing corporate influence in the transatlantic business dialogue. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(2), 204–240. doi:10.1177/0893318904265126
   Google Scholar