An Ecological Turn in Rhetoric of Health Scholarship: Attending to the Historical Flow and Percolation of Ideas, Assumptions, and Arguments

References

• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. New York: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bute, J. J., & Jensen, R. E. (2010). Low-income women describe fertility-related expectations: Descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and behavior. Health Communication, 25(8), 681–691. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.521909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bute, J. J., & Jensen, R. E. (2011). Narrative sense-making and time lapse: Interviews with low-income women about sex education. Communication Monographs, 78(2), 212–232. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.564639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrion, M., & Jensen, R. E. (2014). Curricular decision-making among public school sex educators. Sex Education, 14(6), 623–634. doi:10.1080/14681811.2014.919444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (1990). The birth of understanding: Chaste science and the harlot of the arts. Communication Monographs, 57(4), 323–327. doi:10.1080/03637759009376207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (1999). The meanings of the gene: Public debates about human heredity. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, R. (1997). On beyond living: Rhetorical transformations of the life sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5–24. doi:10.1080/02773940509391320
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2007). Using science to argue for sexual education in U.S. public schools: Ella Flagg Young and the 1913 “Chicago Experiment.” Science Communication, 29(2), 217–241. doi:10.1177/1075547007309101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2008). Sexual polysemy: The discursive ground of talk about sex and education in U.S. history. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(4), 396–415. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.00032.x
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2010). Dirty words: The rhetoric of public sex education, 1870–1920. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2015). Improving upon nature: The rhetorical ecology of chemical language, reproductive endocrinology, and the medicalization of infertility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(2), 329–353. doi:10.1080/00335630.2015.1025098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E., & Bute, J. J. (2010). Fertility-related perceptions and behaviors among low-income women: Injunctive norms, sanctions, and the assumption of choice. Qualitative Health Research, 20(11), 1573–1584. doi:10.1177/1049732310375619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1994). Toward the development of critical health communication praxis. Health Communication, 6(1), 55–67. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0601_4
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2006). Kairos as indeterminate risk management: The pharmaceutical industry’s response to bioterrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(2), 115–143. doi:10.1080/00335630600816938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., Segal, J. Z., & Keränen, L. (2013). The rhetorics of health and medicine: Inventional possibilities for scholarship and engaged practice. Poroi, 9(1), 1–6. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1157
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2005a). Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2005b). Interdisciplinarity and bibliography in rhetoric of health and medicine. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 311–318. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_9
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. (1991). Rome: The book of foundations. (F. McCarren, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. (1995). Conversations on science, culture, and time. (R. Lapidus, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharf, B. F. (1990). Physician-patient communication as interpersonal rhetoric: A narrative approach. Health Communication, 2(4), 217–231. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0204_2
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, M. (1985). The rhetoric of dehumanization: An analysis of medical reports of the Tuskegee syphilis project. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49(4), 233–247. doi:10.1080/10570318509374200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanderford, M. L. (1989). Vilification and social movements: A case study of pro-life and pro-choice rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 75(2), 166–182. doi:10.1080/00335638909383870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar