College Students’ Psychological Needs and Intrinsic Motivation to Learn: An Examination of Self-Determination Theory

References

• Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 853–874. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J. (1994). Student motivation scale. In R. B. Ruin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 343–346). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X200011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2015). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of affective learning and student engagement. Communication Research, Ahead of Press, 1–12. doi:10.1080/08934215.2014.962752
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Exploratory theoretical tests of the instructor humor-student learning link. Communication Education, 64, 45–64. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Griffin, D. J. (2011). Teacher leadership and intellectual stimulation: Improving students’ approaches to studying through intrinsic motivation. Communication Research Reports, 28, 337–346. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.615958
   Google Scholar
• Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002. doi:10.1348/096317909X481382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom? Using self-determination theory to consider student motivation and learner empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23, 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 200–215. doi:10.1080/00461528309529274
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–107. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. doi:10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comadena, M. E., Hunt, S. K., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24, 241–248. doi:10.1080/08824090701446617
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27. doi:10.3102/00346543071001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Self-determination. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431–442). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264–291. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1–20. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Mansson, D. H., & Kaufmann, R. (2014). The cognitive learning measure: A three-study examination of validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 163–176. doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.903389
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144. doi:10.1080/01463379409369922
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–440. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2009). College teacher misbehaviors: Direct and indirect effects on student communication behavior and traditional learning outcomes. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 204–219. doi:10.1080/10570310902856089
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Revisiting instructor misbehaviors: A revised typology and development of a measure. Communication Education, 64, 133–153. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Myers, S. A., & Bolkan, S. (2012). Personalized education and student motives for communicating with instructors: An examination of Chinese and American classrooms. China Media Research, 8, 94–100.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175–213. doi:10.1023/A:1005614228250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L. (1994). Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., Hess, J. A., & Trees, A. R. (2003). Sustaining the desire to learn: Dimensions of perceived instructional facework related to student involvement and motivation to learn. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 357–381. doi:10.1080/1057031030937477
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional feedback II: How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63, 498–517. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.632660
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. G. McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2001). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and individual differences, 13, 251–258. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99–125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214–226. doi:10.1080/03634528509378609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5, 375–382. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00651.x
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, L., Richmond, V., & McCroskey, J. (2002). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Contributions from the discipline of communication. Communication Education, 51, 383–391. doi:10.1080/03634520216521
   Google Scholar
• Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203–214. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Elliot, A. J. (2010). Person-level relatedness and the incremental value of relating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 754–767. doi:10.1177/0146167210371622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A. (2001). Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom: Effects on student perceptions of climate, apprehension, and state motivation. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 113–137. doi:10.1080/10570310109374696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144. doi:10.1177/1477878509104318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41, 167–180. doi:10.1080/03634529209378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to education settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Sickenius, B. (1994). Development and validation of a brief measure of the three psychological needs underlying intrinsic motivation: The AFS scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 506–515. doi:10.1177/0013164494054002025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. doi:10.1080/03634529009378801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293–305. doi:10.1080/03634529609379059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of human motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 14–54). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–36). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation school (pp. 171–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trepanier, S. G., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2013). Workplace bullying and psychological health at work: The mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Work & Stress, 27, 123–140. doi:10.1080/02678373.2013.782158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H. (2006). What does “personalized education” mean for faculty, and how should it serve our students? Communication Education, 55, 345–352. doi:10.1080/03634520600748649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H. (2007). Answering the question: Student perceptions of personalized education and the construct’s relationship to learning outcomes. Communication Education, 56, 409–432. doi:10.1080/03634520701400090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 24 (pp. 207–230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48, 48–62. doi:10.1080/03634529909379152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2003). The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20, 376–383. doi:10.1080/08824090309388837
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar