Liking and Other Reactions After a Get-Acquainted Interaction: A Comparison of Continuous Face-to-Face Interaction versus Interaction that Progresses from Text Messages to Face-to-Face

References

• Antheunis, M., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: An experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 831–836. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377. doi:10.1177/0146167297234003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 49–67. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34, 287–318. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657–677. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgays, D. K., Hyman, I., & Schreiber, J. (2014). Texting everywhere for everything: Gender and age differences in cellphone etiquette and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 314–321. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.lib.ilstu.edu/enhanced/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00333.x/
   Google Scholar
• Kashy, D. A., & Snyder, D. K. (1995). Measurement and data analytic issues in couples research. Psychological Assessment, 7, 338–348. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., & Green, M. A. (2003). Online versus face-to-face conversation: An examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40, 155–163. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., & Zanolla, D. (2013). When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1565–1571. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neustaedter, C., & Greenberg, S. (2012). Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 753–762). Austin, TX: ACM. doi:10.1145/2207676.2207785
   Google Scholar
• Okdie, B. M., Guadagno, R. E., Bernieri, F. J., Geers, A. L., & Mclarney-Vesotski, A. R. (2011). Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 153–159. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). 5 facts about online dating. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/20/5-facts-about-online-dating/
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237–246. doi:10.1177/0265407512453827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabby, M. K., & Walther, J. B. (2003). Computer-mediated communication impacts on relationship formation and maintenance. In D. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 141–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., Sumner, E. M., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2015). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 99–114. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Wang, Z. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2004). The effect of interactivity on initial interactions: The influence of information valence and modality and information richness on computer-mediated interaction. Communication Monographs, 71, 422–447. doi:10.1080/0363452042000307461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523–547. doi:10.1177/0003122412448050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S. (2014). Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 443–479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. L., & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Pulling the strings: Effects of friend and parent opinions on dating choices. Personal Relationships, 19, 743–758. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2013). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16, 5–23. doi:10.1177/1461444812472486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar