Deciding How to Deceive: Differences in Communication and Detection Between Good and Bad Liars

References

• Baumeister, R. F., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C., & Fahey, W. (1987). False suspicion and the misperception of deceit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 41–46. doi:10.1111/bjso.1987.26.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477–492. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, Jr., C. F., Kahler, K. N., & Paolicelli, L. M. (1985). The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 331–345. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242. doi:10.1111/comt.1996.6.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (2004). Interpersonal deception theory. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Readings in persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 239–264). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation, and emotion. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 9, 54–59. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Telling lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1713–1722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. F., Marett, D., & Tilley, P. (2004). Deception detection under varying electronic media and warning conditions. System Sciences, 1(1), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., Woodworth, M. T., & Goorha, S. (2010). See no evil: The effect of communication medium and motivation on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 327–343. doi:10.1007/s10726-009-9169-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselhuhn, M. P., & Wong, E. M. (2011). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1–6. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Schnall, S., Yi, D. J., & White, M. P. (2013). Social distance decreases responders’ sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game. Judgment & Decision-Making, 8, 632–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Wall, L. L., Dolezal, J. M., & Norman, K. L. (1973). Differential weighting of positive and negative traits in impression formation as a function of prior exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 114–115. doi:10.1037/h0033846
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine, T. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 378–392. doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. (2016). Examining sender and judge variability in honesty assessments and deception detection accuracy: Evidence for a transparent liar but no evidence of deception-general ability. Communication Research Reports, 33, 188–194. doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1186629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Kim, R. K., Park, H. S., & Hughes, M. (2006). Deception detection accuracy is a predictable linear function of message veracity base-rate: A formal test of Park and Levine’s probability model. Communication Monographs, 73, 243–260. doi:10.1080/03637750600873736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., & McCornack, S. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect.” Communications Monographs, 66, 125–144. doi:10.1080/03637759909376468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B., Shulman, H., Clare, D. D., Park, H. S., Shaw, A. S.,…Lee, J. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377–403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., Litterer, J., Minton, J., & Saunders, D. (1994). Negotiation (2nd ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Richey, J. A., Cromer, K., Mallott, M., Lejuez, C. W., Joiner, T. E., & Schmidt, N. B. (2007). Dispositional anxiety and risk-avoidant decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 665–675. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, I. (2012). The face of the enemy: The effect of press-reported visual information regarding the facial features of opponent politicians on support for peace. Political Communication, 29, 243–256. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.694987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marett, K., & George, J. F. (2013). Barriers to deceiving other group members in virtual settings. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(1), 89–115. doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9297-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCornack, S. A. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 1–16. doi:10.1080/03637759209376245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., Paik, J. E., Wisner, A. M., & Zhu, X. (2014). Information manipulation theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 348–377. doi:10.1177/0261927X14534656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., Ten Brinke, L., & Gustaw, C. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 16, 477–491. doi:10.1080/10683160902926141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezlescu, C., Duchaine, B., Olivola, C. Y., & Chater, N. (2012). Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. Plos One, 7, 1–6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies in self-reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36, 2–25. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76–105. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiff, J., Kim, H., & Ramesh, C. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19(3), 326–345. doi:10.1177/009365092019003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagishi, H., Fujii, T., Kameshima, S., Koizumi, M., & Takahashi, T. (2009). Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 30, 643–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236. doi:10.1023/B:SORE.0000027411.35832.53
   Google Scholar
• The Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74. doi:10.1177/0022022105282295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, A., & Srivastava, J. (2012). Role of information asymmetry and situational salience in reducing intergroup bias: The case of ultimatum games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1671–1683. doi:10.1177/0146167212458327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swol, L. M., & Braun, M. (2014a). Channel choice, justification of deception, and detection. Journal of Communication, 64, 1139–1159. doi:10.1111/jcom.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swol, L. M., & Braun, M. (2014b). Communicating deception: Differences in language use, justifications, and questions for lies, omissions, and truths. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, 1343–1367. doi:10.1007/s10726-013-9373-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swol, L. M., Braun, M. T., & Kolb, M. R. (2015). Deception, detection, demeanor, and truth bias in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 42(8), 1116–1142. doi:10.1177/0093650213485785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swol, L. M., Malhotra, D., & Braun, M. T. (2012). Deception and its detection: Effects of monetary incentives and personal relationship history. Communication Research, 39, 217–238. doi:10.1177/0093650210396868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2011). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2006). Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 589–599. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. T., & Carville, S. E. (2008). Would I lie to you? Self-serving lies and other oriented lies told across different media. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1021–1031. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar