From the Technical Know-How to the Free Flow of Ideas: Exploring the Effects of Leader, Peer, and Team Communication on Employee Creativity

References

• Academy of Arts. (2016). School of game design. Retrieved from http://www.academyart.edu/game-design-school/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Adobe. (2016). State of create. Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/max/pdfs/AdobeStateofCreate_2016_Report_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, H. A., & Sheer, V. C. (2013). The mediating role of perceived cooperative communication in the relationship between interpersonal exchange relationships and perceived group cohesion. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 443–465. doi:10.1177/0893318913492564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. R., & Omilion-Hodges, L. M. (2013). The effect of leader–member exchange differentiation within work units on coworker exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 30(4), 313–322. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.837387
   Google Scholar
• Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerne, M., Jaklic, M., & Skerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9, 63–85. doi:10.1177/1742715012455130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Takeuchi, R., & Shum, C. (2013). A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee. Organization Science, 24(6), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do coworkers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of lateral social influences in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082–1103. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2012). Context and creativity: The theory of planned behavior as an alternative mechanism. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 681–692. doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.4.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., Anderson, T. A., & Veillette, A. (2008). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group Organization Management, 34, 330–357. doi:10.1177/1059601108329811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dansereau, Jr., F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations—A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFillippi, R., Grabher, G., & Jones, C. (2007). Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5), 511–521. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, T. B. (2005). Creativity in the context of team diversity: Team leader perspectives. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 207–225. doi:10.1177/1523422305274526
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming transcendence through organizing. Communication Research, 17(2), 139–164. doi:10.1177/009365090017002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (2009). Identity affirmation through “signature style”: A study of toy car designers. Human Relations, 62(7), 1041–1072. 10.1177/0018726709335538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The measurement of leadership attitudes in industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 153–158. doi:10.1037/h0063436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fram, S. M. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, L. M., Leeman, M., Norander, S., Young, S. L., & Rawlins, W. K. (2008). The intermingling of aesthetic sensibilities and instrumental rationalities in a collaborative art studio. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 423–453. doi:10.1177/0893318907313711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemlin, S., & Olsson, L. (2011). Creativity-stimulating leadership: A critical incident study of leaders’ influence on creativity in research groups. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20, 49–58. doi:10.1111/caim.2011.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, J. K. (1950). Relations between the size of the group and the behavior of superior leaders. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 32, 11–12. doi:10.1080/00224545.1950.9919026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, B., McLean, G. N., & Yang, B. (2013). Creativity and human resource development: An integrative literature review and a conceptual framework for future research. Human Resource Development Review, 12(4), 390–421. doi:10.1177/1534484313481462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., Lee, K. C., & Jo, N. Y. (2012). The influence of team-member exchange on self-reported creativity in the korean information and and communication technology (ICT) industry. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7198, 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187–1212. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Creativity in virtual work: Effects of demographic differences. Small Group Research, 42, 536–561. doi:10.1177/1046496410397382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 226–246. doi:10.1177/1523422305274528
   Google Scholar
• Meiners, E. B., & Boster, F. J. (2012). Integrative process in manager–employee negotiations: Relational and structural factors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 208–228. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.636374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeran, B. (2009). The organization of creativity in Japanese advertising production. Human Relations, 62(7), 963–985. doi:10.1177/0018726709335541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2012). Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112, 125–145. doi:10.1108/02635571211193671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. K., Netting, F. E., & Thomas, M. L. (2008). Grounded theory: Managing the challenge for those facing institutional review board oversight. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 28–45. doi:10.1177/1077800407308907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., Kase, R., & Skerlavaj, M. (2010). Networks for generating and validating ideas: The social side of creativity. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12, 41–52. doi:10.5172/impp.12.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omilion-Hodges, L. M., & Baker, C. R. (2013). Contextualizing LMX within the workgroup: The effects of LMX and justice on relationship quality and resource sharing among peers. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 935–951. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omilion-Hodges, L. M., & Baker, C. R. (2017). Communicating Leader-Member Relationship Quality. International Journal of Business Communication. doi: 10.1177/2329488416687052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omilion-Hodges, L. M., Ptacek, J. K., & Zerilli, D. H. (2015). A comprehensive review and communication research agenda of the contextualized workgroup: The Evolution and future of leader-member exchange, coworker exchange, and team-member exchange. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 343–377. doi:10.1080/23808985.2015.11735265
   Google Scholar
• Omilion-Hodges, L. M., & Wieland, S. M. B. (2016). Unraveling the leadership dichotomy in the classroom and beyond. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(1), 110–128. doi:10.12806/V15/I1/A3
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 78–87. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 55–77. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheer, V. C. (2014). “Exchange lost” in leader-member exchange theory and research: A critique and a reconceptualization. Leadership, 11(2), 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Sias, P. M. (2005). Workplace relationship quality and employee information experiences. Communication Studies, 56, 375–395. doi:10.1080/10510970500319450
   Google Scholar
• Sias, P. M. (2009). Organizing relationships: Traditional and emerging perspectives on workplace relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. K. (2011). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 27–41. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (2006). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader-member exchange (lmx), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 456–465. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zackariasson, P., Styhre, A., & Wilson, T. L. (2006). Phronesis and creativity: Knowledge work in video game development. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(4), 419–429.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar