“It’s like Taking Your Man Card Away”: Male Victims’ Narratives of Male-to-Male Sexual Harassment

References

• Biber, J. K., Doverspike, D., Baznik, D., Cober, A., & Ritter, B. A. (2002). Sexual harassment in online communications: Effects of gender and discourse medium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 33–42. doi:10.1089/109493102753685863
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bingham, S. G., & Burleson, B. R. (1989). Multiple effects of messages with multiple goals: Some perceived outcomes of responses to sexual harassment. Human Communication Research, 16, 184–216. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A dictionary of media and communication (1st ed.). Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com.ezproxy.uky.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780199568758.001.0001/acref-9780199568758-e-1190?rskey=uND1m3&result=2186
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2002). Grounded theory. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 335–352). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chawki, M., & el Shazly, Y. (2013). Online sexual harassment: Issues & solutions. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 4, 71–86. Retrieved from https://www.mensenhandelweb.nl/system/files/documents/29%20Jul%202015/online%20sexual%20harrasment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P. (1993a). The bureaucratization, commodification, and privatization of sexual harassment through institutional discourse: A study of the big ten universities. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 123–157. doi:10.1177/0893318993007002001
   Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P. (1993b). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs, 60, 113–136. doi:10.1080/03637759309376304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P. (1994). Resistance and oppression as a self-contained opposite: An organizational communication analysis of one man’s story of sexual harassment. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 235–262. doi:10.1080/10570319409374499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P. (1998). Organizing silence: A world of possibilities. New York, NY: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P., McGoun, M. J., & Spirek, M. M. (1993). Sexual harassment responses of working women: An assessment of current communication oriented typologies and perceived effectiveness of the response. In G. Kreps (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Communication implications of effectiveness of the response (pp. 200–224). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organization and the organization of space: Power, identity, and materiality at work. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• DeFour, D. C., David, G., Diaz, F. J., & Thompkins, S. (2003). The interface of race, sex, sexual orientation, and ethnicity in understanding sexual harassment. In M. Paludi & C. Paludi Jr. (Eds.), Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A handbook of cultural, social science, management, and legal perspectives (pp. 31–45). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S. (1999). Dialogue through standpoint: Understanding women’s and men’s standpoints of sexual harassment. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 436–468. doi:10.1177/0893318999123003
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S. (2001). Women’s discursive construction of a sexual harassment paradox. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 2, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S. (2009). Sexual harassment as destructive organizational process. In P. Lutgen-Sandvik & B. D. Sypher (Eds.), Destructive organizational communication: Processes consequences, and constructive ways of organizing (pp. 203–226). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S., & Smythe, M. J. (2004). Sensemaking, organizational culture, and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 293–317. doi:10.1080/0090988042000275998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEOC. (2017). Sexual harassment. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexual_harassment.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M. (2000). Excessive internet use: Implications for sexual behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 537–552. doi:10.1089/109493100420151
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, J., Ferguson, P., & Rhodes, S. C. (2001). Cultural indicators of sexual harassment. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 33–50. doi:10.1080/10417940109373217
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (1994). Homophobia as masculinity: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinity (pp. 119–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., & Robins, G. (2009). Hegemonic and other masculinities in local social contexts. Men and Masculinities, 11, 387–423. doi:10.1177/1097184X06298776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12, 423–445. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliaccio, T. (2009). Men’s friendships: Performances of masculinity. Journal of Men’s Studies, 17, 226–241. doi:10.3149/jms.1703.226
   Google Scholar
• Retzinger, S. (1991). Violent emotions: Shame and rage in marital quarrels. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, B. K., & Taylor, J. (2009). Sexual harassment at the intersection of race and gender: A theoretical model of the sexual harassment experiences of women of color. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 248–272. doi:10.1080/10570310903082065
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, B. A. (2014). Deviant behavior in computer-mediated communication: Development and validation of a measure of cybersexual harassment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 197–214. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummens, N., & Kerfoot, D. (2009). Gay men at work: (Re)constructing the self as professional. Human Relations, 62, 763–786. doi:10.1177/0018726709103457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarduzio, J. A., & Geist-Martin, P. (2008). Making sense of fractured identities: Male professors’ narratives of sexual harassment. Communication Monographs, 75, 353–379. doi:10.1080/03637750802512363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarduzio, J. A., & Geist-Martin, P. (2010). Accounting for victimization: Male professors’ ideological positioning in stories of sexual harassment. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 419–445. doi:10.1177/0893318909358746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, S. (2008). Cyber-sexual harassment: The development of the cyber-sexual experiences questionnaire. McNair Scholars Journal, 12, 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, D. P., & Padavic, I. (2007). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity in a batterer intervention program. Gender & Society, 21, 625–649. doi:10.1177/0891243207304975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, H. (2015). Liminality, space, and the importance of “transitory dwelling places” at work. Human Relations, 68, 633–658. doi:10.1177/0018726714536938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiler, A. P. (2004). Thirty years after the discovery of gender: Psychological concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50, 15–26. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000011069.02279.4c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale, M. S., Visio, M., & Batra, L. (1999). The sexual harassment of men: Evidence for a broader theory of sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 630–664. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsley, N. C., & Geist, P. (2000). The discursive enactment of hegemony: Sexual harassment and academic organizing. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 190–217. doi:10.1080/10570310009374671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative methodology matters: Creating and communicating qualitative research with impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, N. (1991). Hegemonic masculinity on the mound: Media representations of Nolan Ryan and American sport culture. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 290–306. doi:10.1080/15295039109366799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York, NY: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van Royen, K., Vandebosch, H., & Poels, K. (2015). Severe sexual harassment on social networking sites: Belgian adolescents’ views. Journal of Children and Media, 9, 472–491. doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.1089301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 59–79. doi:10.1023/A:1025776705629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, S. (1999). Gender and sexual harassment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 169–190. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 9, 333–356. doi:10.1177/0959353599009003012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (1992). Telling our stories: Narratives as a basis for theorizing about sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 349–364. doi:10.1080/00909889209365343
   Google Scholar