Communication ethics and the rejection of paternalism in John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty

References

• Ahuja, R. D., Walker, M., & Tadepalli, R. (2001). Paternalism, limited paternalism and the Pontius Pilate plight when researching children. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 81–92. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25074555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, P. (Ed.). (2007). Exploring communication ethics: Interviews with influential scholars in the field. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber’s dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (1991). The status of communication ethics scholarship in speech communication journals from 1915 to 1985. In K. J. Greeberg (Ed.), Conversations on communication ethics (pp. 55–72). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (2005). Dialogic confession: Bonhoeffer’s rhetoric of responsibility. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (2013). Communication ethics in dark times: Hannah Arendt’s rhetoric of warning and hope. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (2017). Levinas’s rhetorical demand: The unending obligation of communication ethics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C., & Arneson, P. (1999). Dialogic civility in a cynical age: Community, hope and interpersonal relationships. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C., Fritz, J. M. H., & Bell, L. M. (2009). Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S., & Posner, R. A. (2009). Uncommon sense: Economic insights, from marriage to terrorism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beisecker, A. E., & Beisecker, T. D. (1993). Using metaphors to characterize doctor-patient relationships: Paternalism versus consumerism. Health Communication, 5(1), 41–58. Online ISSN: 1532-7027. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0501_3
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R. C., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (2008). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in american life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Promethus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. E. (2009). Native resistive rhetoric and the decolonization of American Indian removal discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95(1), 66–88. doi:10.1080/00335630802621052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botting, E. H. (2016). Wollstonecraft, mill, and women’s human rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyden, M. (2011). Beyond ‘Eurocentrism’?: The challenge of linguistic justice theory to translation studies. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 6(2), 174–188. Online ISSN: 1876-2700. doi:10.1075/tis.6.2.04boy
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. P., Schmierbach, M., & McLeod, D. M. (2013). Preexisting factors or media effect? Understanding the third-person perception. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 21, 230–246. doi:10.1080/15456870.2013.823967
   Google Scholar
• Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S. D., & Vaslow, J. B. (2000). Just doing business: Modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(1), 72–97. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. R. G. Smith (trans.) (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1974). Philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capaldi, N. (2004). John Stuart Mill: A biography. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, J. D. (1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, I.-H., & Lee, S. T. (2012). Strategic and ethical issues in antismoking message development: How US public health campaigners conceptualize efficacy and ethicality. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 50(5), 238–250. ISSN: 1463-5240. doi:10.1080/14635240.2012.723373
   Google Scholar
• Cherwitz, R. A., & Hikins, J. W. (1979). John Stuart Mill’s on liberty: Implications for the epistemology of the new rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 12–24. doi:10.1080/00335637909383455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, C. (2017, August 23). Chancellor Christ: Free speech is who we are. Berkeley News. Retrieved from https://news.berkeley.edu/2017/08/23/chancellor-christ-free-speech-is-who-we-are/
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G. (2007). Utilitarianism in media ethics and its discontents. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(2&3), 113–131. Online ISSN: 1532-7728. doi:10.1080/08900520701315640
   Google Scholar
• Claeys, G. (2013). Mill and paternalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conly, S. (2013). Against autonomy: Justifying coercive paternalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. (1997). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Mill on utilitarianism. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Rochefoucauld, A. (2007). To the highlands in 1786: The inquisitive journey of a young French aristocrat. In E. Richards (Ed.), Debating the highland clearances. Series: Debates and documents in Scottish history (pp. 129–130). Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Series: SUNY series in speech communication. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyzenhaus, D. (1997). John Stuart Mill and the harm of pornography. In G. Dworkin (Ed.), Mill’s On Liberty: Critical essays (pp. 31–53). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom. (40th anniversary Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, J. M. H. (2013). Professional civility: Communicative virtue at work. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, J. M. H., Arnett, R. C., & Conkel, M. (1999). Organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 289–299. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25074140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, T. (2015). Oakeshott’s pilgrimage past J.S. Mill. Modern Age, 57(2), 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, N. (2014). Thinking historically about neoliberalism: A response to William Davies. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7/8), 303–307. doi:10.1177/0263276414546385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garay, R. G. (2011). U.S. steel and Gary, West Virginia: Corporate paternalism in Appalachia. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gostin, L. O., & Gostin, K. G. (2009). A broader liberty: J.S. Mill, paternalism and the public’s health. Public Health, 123, 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, R. J. (1976). Political thinkers, vol. IV: John Stuart Mill. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasian, M., Jr., & Bialowas, A. (2009). Gendered nationalism, the colonial narrative, and the rhetorical significance of the Mother India controversy. Communication Quarterly, 57(4), 469–486. doi:10.1080/01463370903320849
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, D. R. (2005). The role of economists in ending the draft. Econ Journal Watch, 2(2), 362–376. Retrieved from http:hdl.handle.net/10945/40241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1958). Leviathan: Parts I and II. Series: The Library of Liberal Arts. New York, NY: The Liberal Arts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holba, A. (2010). Political communication and leisure. The Review of Communication, 10(1), 20–37. doi:10.1080/15358590903248736
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins, A., & Poole, A. (2014). Framing fracking: Private property, common resources, and regimes of governance. Journal of Political Ecology, 21(1), 303–319. doi:10.2458/jpe.v21i1
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. (2018). The interruption that we are: The health of the lived body, narrative, and public moral argument. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. J., & Rufo, K. (2000). The call of conscience, rhetorical interruptions, and the euthanasia controversy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(1), 1–23. Online ISSN: 1479-5752. doi:10.1080/00909880009365551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. V. (1997). Ethical issues in the communication process. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kateb, G. (2002). Emerson and self-reliance. New edition. Modernity and political thought series. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, A. S. (2001). The ‘public’ up against the state: Narrative cracks and credibility crisis in postcolonial Hong Kong. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 121–144. doi:10.1177/02632760122051670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy, M. G. (2010). White innocence heroes: Recovery, reversals, paternalism, and David Duke. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 3(3), 206–227. doi:10.1080/17513057.2010.487221
   Google Scholar
• Leavis, F. R. (1959). Introduction. In Mill on Bentham and Coleridge. (pp. 1–38). London, UK: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. A. Lingis (trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luik, J. C. (1993). Tobacco advertising bans and the dark face of governmental paternalism. International Journal of Advertising, 12(4), 303–324. doi:10.1080/02650487.1993.11104548
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, D. (1994). Rights, welfare, and Mill’s moral theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: An study in moral theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1987). The logic of the moral sciences. Series: Open Court Classics. Chicago, IL: Open Court Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (2003). Utilitarianism. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism, On liberty, essay on Bentham: Together with selected writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin (pp. 181–234). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (2005). On liberty. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Moro, N., & Aikat, D. (2013). Liberty v. libel: Disparity and reconciliation in freedom of expression theory. First Amendment Studies, 47(1), 58–83. doi:10.1080/08997225.2012.732763
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, E. (Ed.). (1950). John Stuart Mill’s philosophy of scientific method. Series: Hafner library of classics (Vol. 12). New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (1996). On the genealogy of morals: A polemic. Series: Oxford world’s classics. Translated by Douglas Smith. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, K. T. (2011). Ethics of disability: Foundation of the profession of speech-language pathology. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32(4), 279–288. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1292753
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persky, J. (2016). The political economy of progress: John Stuart Mill and modern radicalism. Oxford Scholarship Online. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190460631.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. (1998). Mill’s political economy: Ricardian science and liberal utilitarian art. In J. Skorupski (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mill (pp. 293–337). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1965). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, J. (2007). After identity. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21(1), 5–18. doi:10.1080/10304310601103893
   Google Scholar
• Saunders-Hastings, E. (2014). No better to give than to receive: Charity and women’s subjection in J.S. Mill. Polity, 46(2), 233–254. doi:10.1057/pol.2014.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmel, B. (1984). John Stuart Mill and the pursuit of virtue. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevitch, B. (1971). The rhetoric of paternalism: Elbert H. Gary’s arguments for the twelve hour day. Western Speech, 35(1), 15–23. doi:10.1080/10570317109373676
   Google Scholar
• Smart, P. (1991). Mill and Marx: Individual liberty and the roads to freedom. New York, NY: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, J. (2015). The Sapphires were not the Australian supremes: Neoliberalism, history and pleasure in The Sapphires. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29(1), 17–31. doi:10.1080/10304312.2014.968526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburrini, C. (2001). What’s wrong with J.S. Mill’s ‘harm-to-others’-principle? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 38, 1–26. doi:10.1080/00948705.2011.9714546
   Google Scholar
• Tawney, R. H. (2006). Religion and the rise of capitalism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. (2009). Paternalism, participation, and partnership-the evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Education and Counseling, 74, 150–155. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D. (2004). Bare-knuckled broadcasting: Enlisting manly respectability and racial paternalism in the battle against chain stores, chain stations, and the Federal radio commission on Louisiana’s KWKH, 1924-33. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 1(3), 193–211. doi:10.1386/rajo.1.3.193/1
   Google Scholar
• Varouxakis, G., & Kelly, P. (2010). John Stuart Mill’s thought and legacy: A timely reappraisal. In G. Varouxakis & P. Kelly (Eds.), John Stuart Mill – Thought and influence: The saint of rationalism. Series: Routledge innovations in political theory (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vatz, R. (2017). What Thomas S. Szasz has wrought: A mixed assessment. In J. A. Schaler, H. Z. Lothane, & R. E. Vatz (Eds.), Thomas S. Szasz: The man and his ideas (pp. 49–60). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (2007). The theory of the leisure class. M. Banta (Ed.) Series: Oxford world’s classics series. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. J. (2012). Political philosophy: An historical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zappen, J. P. (1993). The logic and rhetoric of John Stuart Mill. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 26(3), 191–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar