2,617
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

How social media discourses organize communication online: a multi-level discursive analysis of tensions and contradictions in teens’ online experiences

&

References

  • Above the Fray. (2015). Teen online life survey. Retrieved from https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ATFtest
  • Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2011). Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations, 64(9), 1121–1146. doi:10.1177/0018726711408629
  • Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media, and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
  • Ashcraft, K. L., & Mumby, D. K. (2004). Organizing a critical communicology of gender and work. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 19–44.
  • Bailey, J., Steeves, V., Burkell, J., & Regan, P. (2013). Negotiating with gender stereotypes on social networking sites: From “bicycle face” to Facebook. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(2), 91–112. doi:10.1177/0196859912473777
  • Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956–977. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349
  • Berkelaar, B. L. (2014). Cybervetting, online information, and personnel selection: New transparency expectations and the emergence of a digital social contract. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 479–506. doi:10.1177/0893318914541966
  • boyd, D. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. (PhD Dissertation), University of California Berkeley.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2009). Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62(11), 1607–1633. doi:10.1177/0018726709346379
  • Fairhurst, G. T, & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5–26. doi:10.1111/comt.2004.14.issue-1
  • Fairhust, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2015). Sourcing paradoxical tensions in organizational discourse, 101st Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • French, M., & Bazarova, N. N. (2017). Is anybody out there?: Understanding masspersonal communication through expectations for response across social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 303–319. doi:10.1111/jcc4.2017.22.issue-6
  • Hadad C. (2015, October 13). Why some 13-year-olds check social media 100 times a day CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/05/health/being-13-teens-social-media-study/
  • Harry, B., Sturges, K., & Klingner, J. (2005). Qualitative data analysis: Mapping the process. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.
  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Ivory, A. H., Fox, J., Waddell, T. F., & Ivory, J. D. (2014). Sex role stereotyping is hard to kill: A field experiment measuring social responses to user characteristics and behavior in an online multiplayer first-person shooter game. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.026
  • Kuhn, T. (2009). Positioning lawyers: Discursive resources, professional ethics and identification. Organization, 16(5), 681–704. doi:10.1177/1350508409338886
  • Leavitt, A. (2015). ‘This is a throwaway account’: Temporary technical identities and perceptions of anonymity in a massive online community. Presented at the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing conference, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Lenhart, A. (2015, April 9). Teens, social media and technology: Overview 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  • Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2014). A bumpy ride on the information superhighway: Exploring turbulence online. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 520–529. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.027
  • Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media+ Society, 2(1), 2056305116633482.
  • Malvini Redden, S., & Way, A. K. (2017). ‘Adults don’t understand’: Exploring how teens use dialectical frameworks to navigate webs of tensions in online life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(1), 21–41. doi:10.1080/00909882.2016.1248465
  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience
. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16, 1051–1067. doi:10.1177/1461444814543995
  • McGovern, A., Crofts, T., Lee, M., & Milivojevic, S. (2016). Media, legal and young people’s discourses around sexting. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(4), 428–441. doi:10.1177/2043610616676028
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
  • Roberto, A. J., & Eden, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Aggressive communication in the digital age. In T. A. Avtgis & A. S. Rancer (Eds.), Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.
  • Sims, C. (2014). From differentiated use to differentiating practices: Negotiating legitimate participation and the production of privileged identities. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 670–682. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808363
  • Stern, S. R., & Burke Odland, S. (2017). Constructing Dysfunction: News coverage of teenagers and social media. Mass Communication and Society, 20(4), 505–525. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1274765
  • boyd, d., & Marwick, A. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies.Paper presented at the Oxford Internet Institute Decade in Internet Time Symposium, September 22.
  • Tiidenberg, K., Markham, A., Pereira, G., Rehder, M., Dremljuga, R., Sommer, J. K., & Dougherty, M. (2017, July). ‘I’m an addict and other sensemaking devices’: A discourse analysis of self-reflections on lived experience of social media. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society (p. 21). Toronto, ON, Canada: ACM.
  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Tracy, S. J., & Trethewey, A. (2005). Fracturing the real-self fake-self dichotomy: Moving toward “crystallized” organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 15, 168–195. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00331.x
  • Trethewey, A., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2004). Organized irrationality? Coping with paradox, contradiction, and irony in organizational communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 1–4.
  • Valentini, C., Romenti, S., & Kruckeberg, D. (2016). Language and discourse in social media relational dynamics: A communicative constitution perspective. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4055–4073.
  • Van der Nagle, E. (2018). Alts and automediality: Compartmentalizing the self through multiple social media profiles. M/C Journal, 21(2). http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1379
  • Way, A. K., & Malvini Redden, S. (2017). The study of youth online: A critical review and agenda. Review of Communication, 17(2), 119–136. doi:10.1080/15358593.2017.1293838

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.