Sexual interactions (un)scripted: an exploration of consequential unscripted sexual interactions

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36(7), 715–729. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., Kunkel, A., & Dennis, M. R. (2011). “Let’s (not) talk about that”: Bridging the past sexual experiences taboo to build healthy romantic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(4), 381–391. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.482215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baus, R. D., & Allen, J. L. (1996). Solidarity and sexual communication as selective filters: A report on intimate relationship development. Communication Research Reports, 13(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/08824099609362064
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 469–493. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 36(2), 180–189. doi:10.1080/00224499909551983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, S. E. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? A review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(1–2), 7–25. doi:10.1300/J056v08n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Carton, S. T., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). College students’ psychological well-being and interaction involvement in class. Communication Research Reports, 32(2), 180–184. doi:10.1080/08824096.2015.1016145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala, D. J. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communication competence. Communication Education, 30(2), 109–121. doi:10.1080/03634528109378460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala, D. J. (1984). Affective and cognitive manifestations of interaction involvement during unstructured and competitive interactions. Communication Monographs, 51(4), 320–338. doi:10.1080/03637758409390205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala, D. J., Savage, G. T., Brunner, C. C., & Conrad, A. B. (1982). An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept. Communication Monographs, 49(4), 229–248. doi:10.1080/03637758209376087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffelt, T. A. (2018). Sexual goals, plans, and actions: Toward a sexual script emerging adults use to delay or abstain from sexual intercourse. Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 416–438. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1400095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dainton, M., Goodboy, A. K., Borzea, D., & Goldman, Z. W. (2017). The dyadic effects of relationship uncertainty on negative relational maintenance. Communication Reports, 30(3), 170–181. doi:10.1080/08934215.2017.1282529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5(4), 239–261. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., & Lannutti, P. J. (2010). Examining the content and outcomes of young adults’ satisfying and unsatisfying conversations about sex. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3), 375–385. doi:10.1177/1049732309354274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–43. doi:10.1080/10532528.1990.10559854
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Dai, Y., Zhan, M., & Hample, J. M. (2018). Consequential unscripted interactions: A conceptual and empirical description. Western Journal of Communication, 82(2), 135–159. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1372621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (1993). Memory structures for the rise and fall of personal relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Understanding relationship processes series, Vol. 1. Individuals in relationships (pp. 60–86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781483326283.n3
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., & Bryan, S. P. (2011). Scripts and communication for relationships. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, K., Broetzmann, S., Lim, T., & Kitao, K. (1989). The conversation mop: Scenes in the stream of discourse. Discourse Processes, 12(1), 27–61. doi:10.1080/01638538909544718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblock, L. K., Miller, L. E., Bond, B. J., & Mannone, S. E. (2007). Relational uncertainty and message processing in marriage. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 154–180. doi:10.1080/03637750701390069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents’ sexual scripts: Schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 316–327. doi:10.1080/00224490701580923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La France, B. H. (2010a). What verbal and nonverbal communication cues lead to sex?: An analysis of the traditional sexual script. Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 297–318. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.503161
   Google Scholar
• La France, B. H. (2010b). Predicting sexual satisfaction in interpersonal relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 75(3), 195–214. doi:10.1080/10417940902787939
   Google Scholar
• La France, B. H. (2019). The impact of sexual self-disclosure, sexual compatibility, and sexual conflict on predicted outcome values in sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28(1), 57–67. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2018-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La France, B. H., & Hall, J. A. (2012). Sex, humor, and intimacy: An examination of sexual humor use in close relationships. In R. DiCioccio (Ed.), Humor communication: Theory, impact, and outcomes (pp. 119–139). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2005). Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(2), 169–181. doi:10.1177/0265407505050942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metts, S., & Cupach, W. R. (1989). The role of communication in human sexuality. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 139–161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. In B. R. Burleson & A. W. Kunkel (Eds.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 19, pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Montesi, J. L., Fauber, R. L., Gordon, E. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2010). The specific importance of communicating about sex to couples’ sexual and overall relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5), 591–609. doi:10.1177/0265407510386833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rodgers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 443–463. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006). Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. Journal of Health Communication, 11(4), 365–390. doi:10.1080/10810730600671862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 435–446. doi:10.1080/00224499209551658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planalp, S., & Honeycutt, J. M. (1985). Events that increase uncertainty in personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 11(4), 593–604. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26(4), 491–497. doi:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5
   Google Scholar
• Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, A. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 361–379. doi:10.1177/0265407504042837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, T. M., & Keiley, M. K. (2011). The effects of differentiation of self, adult attachment, and sexual communication on sexual and marital satisfaction: A path analysis. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 37(3), 206–223. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2011.564513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umphrey, L. R., Wickersham, J. A., & Sherblom, J. C. (2008). Student perceptions of the instructor’s relational characteristics, the classroom communication experience, and the interaction involvement in face-to-face versus video conference instruction. Communication Research Reports, 25(2), 102–114. doi:10.1080/08824090802021954
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R., & Parsons, L. A. (1995). What you feel is what you might get: Exploring communication apprehension and sexual communication satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 12(1), 39–45. doi:10.1080/08824099509362037
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R., Wheeless, V. E., & Baus, R. (1984). Sexual communication, communication satisfaction, and solidarity in the developmental stages of intimate relationships. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48(3), 217–230. doi:10.1080/10570318409374158
   Google Scholar