A communicative interdependence perspective of sexual communication and technology in bondage, domination, and sadomasochist relationships

References

• Anderson, M., Kunkel, A., & Dennis, M. R. (2011). “Let’s (not) talk about that”: Bridging the past sexual experiences taboo to build healthy romantic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(4), 381–391. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.482215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardzell, S. (2010). Topping from the viewfinder: The visual language of virtual BDSM photographs in second life. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 2(4), 3–22. doi:10.4101/jvwr.v2i4.704
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1988). Masochism as escape from self. Journal of Sex Research, 25(1), 28–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzini, D. G., Stack, E. R., Martincin, P. D., & Davis, C. P. (2007). The effect of reminiscing about laughter on relationship satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 31(1), 25–34. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., & MacDonald, J. C. (2015). Talking about sexual consent. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(86), 418–432. doi:10.1080/08164649.2016.1158692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt-Vinti, H., Jozkowski, K. N., & Hunt, M. (2019). Show or tell? Does verbal and/or nonverbal sexual communication matter for sexual satisfaction? Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(3), 206–217. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2018.1501446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N., & Pena, J. (2013). Face threatening messages and attraction in social networking sites: Reconciling strategic self-presentation with negative online perceptions. In C. Cunningham (Ed.), Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age (pp. pp. 205–226). New York, NY: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Maycock, B., & Burns, S. (2005). Your picture is your bait: Use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 42(1), 63–73. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552258.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (2011). Beyond the birds and the bees and was it good for you?: Thirty years of research on sexual communication. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 52(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., Demmons, S. & Lawrance, K. (1998). Sexual satisfaction within dating relationships: A test of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152008
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self‐disclosure within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 36(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873–893. doi:10.1111/jcom.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Scherer, C., & Marcus, I. D. (2013). Harnessing the power of the Internet to improve sexual relationships. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the internet: A guide book for clinicians (pp. pp. 209–230). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Courtice, E. L., & Shaughnessy, K. (2018). The partner context of sexual minority women’s and men’s cybersex experiences: Implications for the traditional sexual script. Sex Roles, 78(3-4), 272–285. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0792-5
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, E., Casini, C., & Cipolletta, S. (2014). Forbidden games: The construction of sexuality and sexual pleasure by BDSM “players. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16, 752–764. doi:10.1080/13691058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2019). Affectionate communication in close relationships. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Westerman, D. (2010). Rational actors: Channel selection and rational choices in romantic conflict episodes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(7), 970–981. doi:10.1177/0265407510378302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(2), 246–259. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper].
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. doi:10.1080/13691180500146185
   Google Scholar
• Hertenstein, M. J., Holmes, R., McCullough, M., & Keltner, D. (2009). The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9(4), 566–573. doi:10.1037/a0016108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M. (2016). Further understanding sexual communication: Honesty, deception, safety, and risk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(4), 449–468. doi:10.1177/0265407515578821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattari, S. (2015). ‘Getting it’: Identity and sexual communication for sexual and gender minorities with physical disabilities. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 882–899. doi:10.1007/s12119-015-9298-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. A. (1999). Internet Gambling and Pornography: Illustrative Examples of the Psychological Consequences of Communication Anarchy. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 2, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493199316311
   Google Scholar
• Korchmaros, J., Ybarra, M., & Mitchell, K. (2015). Adolescent online romantic relationship initiation: Differences by sexual and gender identification. Journal of Adolescence, 40, 54–64. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2013). Interpretive theorizing in the seductive world of sexuality and interpersonal communication: Getting guerilla with studies of sexting and purity rings. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2507–2520. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2250/1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2014). Communication and healthy sexual practices: Toward a holistic communicology of sexuality. In M. H. Eaves (Ed.), Applications in health communication: Emerging trends (pp. 263–286). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script- based approach. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 49–92. doi:10.1080/23808985.1996.11678928
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A., & Kelly, L. (2015). The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: An expectancy violation theory approach. Southern Communication Journal, 80(4), 253–270. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2015.1055371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. E., Bartholomew, K., & Cobb, R. J. (2014). Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(3), 329–339. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.742998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006). Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. Journal of Health Communication, 11(4), 365–390. doi:10.1080/10810730600671862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noland, C. M. (2010). Sex talk: The role of communication in intimate relationships. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, C. M., & Manning, J. (2016). Thinking about sexuality and communication. In J. Manning & C. M. Noland (Eds.), Contemporary studies of sexuality & communication: Theoretical & applied perspectives (pp. xiii–xix). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Pitagora, D. (2013). Consent vs. coercion: BDSM interactions highlight a fine but immutable line. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 10, 27–36. doi:10.1037/e543732013-004
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., Jr., & Broneck, K. (2009). ‘IM me’: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2–3), 291–314. doi:10.1177/0265407509106719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richters, J., De Visser, R. O., Rissel, C. E., Grulich, A. E., & Smith, A. (2008). Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): Data from a national survey. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(7), 1660–1668. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00795.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. W., & Kauth, M. R. (2002). Men who have sex with men, and the Internet: Emerging clinical issues and their management. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A Guidebook for Clinicians (pp. 47–69). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2018). Sometimes it’s easier to type things than to say them”: Technology in BDSM sexual partner communication. Sexuality & Culture, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s12119-018-9534-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Iglesias, P., & Byers, E. S. (2020). Development and initial validation of the verbal and nonverbal sexual communication questionnaire in Canada and Spain. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35(1), 60–76. doi:10.1080/14681994.2018.1442569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixma, T. (2009). The gorean community in second life: Rules of sexual inspired role-play. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 1(3), 4–18. doi:10.4101/jvwr.v1i3.330
   Google Scholar
• Tom Tong, S., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Just say “no thanks”: Romantic rejection in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(4), 488–506. doi:10.1177/0265407510384895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (1997). Revealing family secrets: The influence of topic, function, and relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(5), 679–705. doi:10.1177/0265407597145006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. In M. L. Knapp & J. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal Communication (pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Roaché, D. J., & Pusateri, K. B. (2019). Interconnection of multiple communication modes in long-distance dating relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 83(5), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018
   Google Scholar
• Wismeijer, A. A., & Assen, M. A. (2013). Psychological characteristics of BDSM practitioners. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(8), 1943–1952. doi:10.1111/jsm.12192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki, D. K., & Childers, C. D. (2011). “Let my fingers do the talking”: Sexting and infidelity in cyberspace. Sexuality & Culture, 15(3), 217–239. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4
   Google Scholar