Persistence of emotion in the process of inoculation: experiencing post-attack threat, fear, anger, happiness, sadness, and surprise

References

• Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Richards, A. (2017). Apprehension or motivation to defend attitudes? Exploring the underlying threat mechanism in inoculation-induced resistance to persuasion. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 164–178. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1307999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4(2), 107–130. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., & Chase, L. J. (1973). The effects of differential linguistic patterns in messages attempting to induce resistance to persuasion. Speech Monographs, 40(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/03637757309375774
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5(1), 27–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00620.x
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., & Miller, M. D. (1990). Overcoming resistance to persuasion via contingious reinforcement and repetition of message. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 1011–1022. doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2009). Threat explication: What we know and don’t yet know about a key component of inoculation theory. STAM Journal, 39, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2012). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 220–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Ivanov, B. (2012). Untangling threat during inoculation-conferred resistance to influence. Communication Reports, 25(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/08934215.2012.661018
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Ivanov, B. (2014). Reconsidering the role(s) of affect in inoculation theory-conferred resistance to influence. Presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A., & Pfau, M. (2005). Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 29(1), 97–146. doi:10.1080/23808985.2005.11679045
   Google Scholar
• Dallos, R., & Vetere, A. (2009). Systemic therapy and attachment narratives: Applications in a range of clinical settings. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Meijnders, A. (2012). Persuasion and the structure of affect. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 309–327). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Plotnick, C. A., Godbold, L. C., Freimuth, V. S., & Edgar, T. (1996). The multiple affective outcome of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23(1), 44–72. doi:10.1177/009365096023001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham, L. L., & Ivanov, B. (2017). Inoculation messages as a preemptive financial crisis communication strategy with inexperienced investors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(3), 274–293. doi:10.1080/00909882.2017.1320571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B. (2017). Inoculation theory applied in health and risk messaging. In R. Parrott (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of health and risk message design and processing  (pp. 278–304). New York City, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.254
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Miller, C. H., Compton, J., Averbeck, J. M., Harrison, K. J., Sims, J. D., … Parker, J. L. (2012). Effects of post-inoculation talk on resistance to influence. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 701–718. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01658.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Parker, K. A., & Dillingham, L. L. (2018). Testing the limits of inoculation-generated resistance. Western Journal of Communication. doi:10.1080/10570314.2018.1454600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Pfau, M., & Parker, K. A. (2009a). The attitude base as a moderator of the effectiveness of inoculation strategy. Communication Monographs, 76(1), 47–72. doi:10.1080/03637750802682471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Pfau, M., & Parker, K. A. (2009b). Can inoculation withstand multiple attacks? An examination of the effectiveness of the inoculation strategy compared to the supportive and restoration strategies. Communication Research, 36(5), 655–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 326. doi:10.1037/h0048344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J. D., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., … Averbeck, J. A. (2013). Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 127–155. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., & Compton, J. (2012). Inoculation’s efficacy with young adults’ risky behaviors: Can inoculation confer cross-protection over related but untreated issues? Health Communication, 27(3), 223–233. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Rains, S. A., & Ivanov, B. (2016). Examining the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation: The effects of inoculation messages on the cross-protection of related attitudes. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 49–68. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1030681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1995). Designing messages for behavioral inoculation. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice (pp. 99–113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1997). The inoculation model of resistance to influence. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 133–171). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Holbert, R. L., Zubric, S. J., Pasha, N. H., & Lin, W. K. (2000). Role and influence of communication modality in the process of resistance to persuasion. Media Psychology, 2(1), 1–33. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Ivanov, B., Houston, B., Haigh, M., Sims, J., Gilchrist, E., et al. (2005). Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence. Communication Monographs, 72(4), 414–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500322578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Mason, A., Nisbett, G., Lane, L., … Banas, J. (2009). Nuances about the role and impact of affect in inoculation. Communication Monographs, 76(1), 73–98. doi:10.1080/03637750802378807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Szabo, E. A., Anderson, J., Morrill, J., Zubric, J., & Wan, H. H. (2001). The role and impact of affect in the process of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 216–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., & Van Bockern, S. (1994). The persistence of inoculation in conferring resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents: The second year. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 413–430. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. M., & Wood, W. (2004). Forewarnings of influence appeals: Inducing resistance and acceptance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 193–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 345–356. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Eckman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. A., & Dillard, J. P. (1997, November). Affect and persuasion: Evidence for cognitive coloration of message processing. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Trampe, D., Quoidbach, J., & Taquet, M. (2015). Emotions in everyday life. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145450. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analysis syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeal. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 119–138. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar