References
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- Bergkvist, L. (2015). Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 245–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
- Böckenholt, U., & Lehmann, D. R. (2015). On the limits of research rigidity: The number of items in a scale. (2015). Marketing Letters, 26(3), 257–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9373-y
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Center, P. R. (2020). Americans immersed in COVID-19 news; Most think media are doing fairly well covering it. https://www.journalism.org/2020/03/18/americans-immersed-in-covid-19-news-most-think-media-are-doing-fairly-well-covering-it/
- Chen, K., Chen, A., Zhang, J., Meng, J., & Shen, C. (2020). Conspiracy and debunking narratives about COVID-19 origins on Chinese social media: How it started and who is to blame. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1, 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-50
- Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken, and Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Chung, N., Nam, K., & Koo, C. (2016). Examining information sharing in social networking communities: Applying theories of social capital and attachment. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 77–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.005
- Dunwoody, S., & Griffin, R. J. (2015). Risk information seeking and processing model. In H. Cho, T. Reimer, and K. McComas (Eds.), SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 102–116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Eagly, H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Belmong, CA: Wadsworth.
- Gallup. (2020, January, 9). The U.S. remained center-right, ideologically, in 2019. https://news.gallup.com/poll/275792/remained-center-right-ideologically-2019.aspx
- Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
- Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2), S230–S245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
- Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Yang, J. Z. (2013). Linking risk messages to information seeking and processing. Communication Yearbook, 36(1), 323–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679138
- Griffin, R., Yang, J. Z., Ter Huurne, E., Boerner, F., Ortiz, S., & Dunwoody, S. (2008). After the Flood: Anger, Attribution, and the Seeking of Information. Science Communication, 29(3), 285–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007312309
- Guerin, B., & Innes, J. M. (1989). Cognitive tuning sets: Anticipating the consequences of communication. Current Psychology, 8(3), 234–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686752
- Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2020). “Fake news” and emerging online media ecosystem: An integrated intermedia agenda-Setting analysis of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Communication Research, 47(2), 178–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218777177
- Ha, S., & Ahn, J. (2011). Why are you sharing others’ Tweets?: The impact of argument quality and source credibility on information sharing behavior. In ICIS 2011 Proceedings, Paper 4. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/humanbehavior/4/
- Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004). The effect of individual difference variables on information sharing in decision-making groups. Human Communication Research, 30(4), 540–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00744.x
- Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S. H. (2020). A channel-specific analysis of the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model: The role of relevant channel beliefs and perceived information gathering capacity. Science Communication, 42(3), 279–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020926612
- Kahlor, L. (2007). An augmented risk information seeking model: The case of global warming. Media Psychology, 10(3), 414–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701532971
- Kim, H. K., & Lai, C. (2020). Seeking and sharing information about transboundary air pollution in Singapore: Effects of own and others’ information insufficiency. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 68–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1597751
- Kim, J., & Grunig, J. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Leiserowitz, A. A., Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 413–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102505.133552
- Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
- Liao, W., Yuan, Y. C., & McComas, K. (2018). Communal risk information sharing: Motivations behind voluntary information sharing for reducing interdependent risks in a community. Communication Research, 45, 909–933. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626981
- Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
- Nabi, R., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018776019
- Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. In A. Spink, and C. Cole (Eds.), New directions in human information behavior (pp. 113–134). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Ter Huurne, E., Griffin, R., & Gutteling, J. (2009). Risk information seeking among U.S. and Dutch residents: An application of the model of risk information seeking and processing. Science Communication, 31(2), 215–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009332653
- Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differentialgrowth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/267786
- Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley International Reviews, 1(3), 332–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41
- Weber, E. U. (2017). Understanding public risk perception and responses to changes in perceived risk. In E. J. Balleisen, L. S. Bennear, K. D. Krawiec, and J. B. Wiener (Eds.), Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises (pp. 82–106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635.004
- World Health Organization. (2020, February, 2). Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) situation report - 13. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf
- Xue, J., Chen, J., Hu, R., Chen, C., Zheng, C., Su, Y., & Zhu, T. (2020). Twitter discussions and emotions about the COVID-19 pandemic: Machine learning approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), e20550. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/20550
- Yang, J. Z., Aloe, A., & Feeley, T. (2014). Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 20–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12071
- Yang, J. Z., Kahlor, L., & Griffin, D. J. (2014). I share, therefore I am: A U.S. – China comparison of college students’ motivations to share information about climate change. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 112–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12018
- Yang, J. Z., & Liu, Z. (2021). Information seeking and processing in the context of vaccine scandals. Science Communication, 43(3), 279–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020983589
- Yang, J. Z., & Zhuang, J. (2020). Information seeking and information sharing related to Hurricane Harvey. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1054–1079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019887675
- Yang, J. Z. (2019). Whose risk? Why did the U.S. public ignore information about the Ebola outbreak? Risk Analysis, 39(8), 1708–1722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13282
- Yang, Z. J., & Kahlor, L. (2013). What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Science Communication, 35(2), 189–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441873
- Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The process of cognitive tuning and communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(2), 159–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047987