Conversational partners’ interactions in response to co-present mobile phone usage

References

• Alderman, L. (2017, May 2). The phones we love too much. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/well/mind/the-phones-we-love-too-much.html
   Google Scholar
• Ang, C.-S., Teo, K.-M., Ong,Y.-L., & Siak, S.-L. (2019). Investigation of a preliminary mixed method of phubbing and social connectedness in adolescents. Addiction and Health, 11(1), 1–10. doi:10.22122/AHJ.V11I1.539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Campbell, S. W., & Ling, R. (2016). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26(2), 128–149. doi:10.1111/comt.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhold, Q. S., Dunbar, N. E., Merolla, A. J., & Giles, H. (2018). Relational change following hurtful conflict: An extension of identity implications theory. Human Communication Research, 44(2), 127–154. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqx005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Manago, A. M., & Trimble, J. E. (2016). Tempted to text: College students‘ mobile phone use during a face-to-face interaction with a close friend. Emerging Adulthood, 4(6), 440–443. doi:10.1177/2167696816630086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahir, J., & Lloyd, J. (2015). ‘People just don’t care’: Practices of text messaging in the presence of others. Media, Culture & Society, 37(5), 703–719. doi:10.1177/0163443715577242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, S. E. (2018). The changing face of problematic internet use: An interpersonal approach. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. doi:10.1111/jasp.12506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtright, J. A., & Caplan, S. E. (2021). Behavioral responses to phone snubbing. Communication Reports, 34(1), 26–36. doi:10.1080/08934215.2020.1866630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., & Summers, K. (2019). Problematic cell phone use, depression, anxiety, and self-regulation: Evidence from a three year longitudinal study from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 78–84. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, R., & Reimer, T. (2021). Cellphone relevance in face-to-face interactions: The effects of cellphone use on conversational satisfaction. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 274–292. doi:10.1177/2050157920958437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & McDaniel, B. T. (2021). Technology use during couples’ bedtime routines, bedtime satisfaction, and associations with individual and relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(4), 1329–1349. doi:10.1177/0265407521991925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, R., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.106/j.jesp.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L., & Wu, Y. (2016). Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in others. unless they hate cellphones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 384–398. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, A. H., Dvir, M., Wesselmann, E. D., Kruger, D. J., & Finkenauer, C. (2018). Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs. Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 460–473. doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1439877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. A., Bealing, C. E., & Salley, J. M. (2015). 2 TXT or not 2 TXT: College students’ reports of when text messaging is social breach. The Social Science Journal, 52(2), 188–194. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L., & Hardeman, H. (2021). Mobiles in public: Social interaction in a smartphone era. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(1), 103–127. doi:10.1177/2050157920927062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Miller-Ott, A. E., & Duran, R. L. (2017). Sports scores & intimate moments: An expectancy violations theory approach to partner cell phone behaviors in adult romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 81(5), 619–640. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1299206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Miller-Ott, A. E., & Duran, R. L. (2019). Phubbing friends: Understanding face threats from, and responses to, friends’ cell phone usage through the lens of politeness theory. Communication Quarterly, 67(5), 540–559. doi:10.1080/01463373.2019.1668443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuppert, R., & Geber, S. (2020). Commonly done but not socially accepted? Phubbing and social norms in dyadic and small group settings. Communication Research Reports, 37(3), 55–64. doi:10.1080/08824096.2020.1756767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2015). The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: An expectancy violation theory approach. Southern Communication Journal, 80(4), 253–270. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2015.1055371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2016). Competing discourses and meaning-making in talk about romantic partners’ cell phone contact with non-present others. Communication Studies, 67(1), 58–76. doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1088876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2017). A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Communication Studies, 68(2), 190–207. doi:10.1080/10510974.2017.1299024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2020, November). “Put your phone away and pay attention to me”: Interactants’ responses to being phubbed. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Indianapolis, IN (virtual conference).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84(3), 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015, August 26). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center Report. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
   Google Scholar
• Rew, C., & Hosterman, A. R. (2018). Understanding texting etiquette: What factors determine when a person should respond to a text message? Florida Communication Journal, 46(2), 1–13. Retrieved from: https://floridacom.org/fca-journal/
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Samp, J. A. (2021). ‘Phubbing is happening to you:’ Examining predictors and effects of phubbing behavior in friendships. Behaviour & Information Technology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2021.1943711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 121–137). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Hendrickson, A. T., Pollmann, M. M. H., & Ling, R. (2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. E., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: Do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction? European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 173–186. doi:10.1002/per.1996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar