https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-8108
Cases and Statutes
- Benisek v. Lamone 138 S. Ct. (2018).
- Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee 141 S. Ct. 2321 (2021).
- Gill v. Whitford 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018).
- Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006. Pub. L. No. 109–246. US Statutes at Large 120 (2006): 557–581. Codified at 42 U.S.C. §1973.
- Help America Vote Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 107–252. US Statutes at Large 116 (2002): 1667–1730. Codified at 52 U.S.C. 20901 to 21145.
- Husted v. A Philip Randolph Institute, 138 S.Ct. 1833 (2018).
- National Voter Registration Act of 1993. Pub. L. No. 103–31. US Statutes at Large 107 (1993): 72–89. Codified at 42 U.S.C. §1973gg.
- Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, 129 S.Ct. 2504 (2009).
- Ohio v. A Philip Randolph Institute S.D. OH, 2016
- A Philip Randolph Institute v. Husted, 838 F.3d 699 ( 6th Cir. 2016).
- Shelby County. v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 2612 (2013).
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966).
- Rucho v. Common Cause, 139 S.Ct. 2484 (2019).
References
- Anderson, C. (2018). One person, no vote. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
- Banister, J. (2021). The dissociations of John Roberts: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius and the discontents of judicial supremacy. Argumentation and Advocacy, 57(2), 123–139. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1897275
- Brennan Center for Justice. (2022). Voting laws roundup: May 2022. Retrieved from https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-may-2022
- Bullock, C. S., Gaddie, R. K., & Wert, J. (2016). The rise and fall of the voting rights act. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
- Caplan, H. (1954). ( Trans.). Rhetorica ad herennium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Casey, N. (2019, October). Ohio was set to purge 235,000 voters. It was wrong about 20%. New York Times . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/us/politics/ohio-voter-purge.html
- Crenshaw, C. (1998). Colorblind rhetoric. Southern Journal of Communication, 63(3), 244–256. doi:10.1080/10417949809373097
- Daniels, G. R. (2020). Uncounted: The crisis of voter suppression in the United States. New York, NY: NYU Press.
- de Velasco, A. R. (2005). Rethinking Perelman’s universal audience: Political dimensions of a controversial concept. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(2), 47–64. doi:10.1080/02773940509391310
- Derrida, J. (1988). Limited INC. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
- Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (1998). The choices justices make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Pub.
- Gilles, R. (1996). Richard Weaver revisited: Rhetoric left, right, and middle. Rhetoric Review, 15(1), 128–141. doi:10.1080/07350199609359210
- Hall, M. E. K. (2018). What justices want: Goals and personality on the U.S. supreme court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hardy, L. (2020). Voter suppression post-Shelby: Impacts and issues of voter purge and voter ID laws. Mercer Law Review, 71(3), 857–878.
- Hasian, M. (1994). Critical legal rhetorics: The theory and practice of law in a postmodern world. Southern Journal of Communication, 60(1), 44–56. doi:10.1080/10417949409372961
- Jasinski, J. (2001). Sourcebook on rhetoric: Key concepts in rhetorical studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub.
- Kelman, M. (1987). A guide to critical legal studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Langford, K. (2017). Scalia v. Scalia: Opportunistic textualism in constitutional interpretation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
- Lauer, J. M. (2004). Invention in rhetoric and composition. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
- Leff, M. C. (1997). Hermeneutical rhetoric. In W. Jost & M. J. Hyde (Eds.), Rhetoric and hermeneutics in our time: A reader (pp. 196–214). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Lucaites, J. L. (1990). Between rhetoric and “the law”: Power, legitimacy, and social change. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76(4), 435–449. doi:10.1080/00335639009383935
- O‘Scannlain, D. F. (2017). We are all textualists now”: The legacy of Justice Scalia. St. John’s Law Review, 91(2), 303–313.
- Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, trans). Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
- Roosevelt, K. (2006). The myth of judicial activism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Scalia, A. (2020). The essential Scalia: On the constitution, the courts, and the rule of law, J. Sutton & E. Whelan, (Eds.) New York, NY: Crown Forum.
- Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (1993). The supreme court and the attitudinal model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Unah, I., & Hancock, A. (2006). U.S. supreme court decision making, case salience, and the attitudinal model. Law & Policy, 28(3), 295–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00228
- Watson, M. S. (1997). The dynamics of intertextuality: Re-reading the declaration of Independence. In T. W. Benson (Ed.), Rhetoric and political culture in nineteenth-century America (pp. 91-112). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
- Weaver, R. (1953). The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Co.
- Zarefsky, D. (2020). Underlying assumptions of examining argumentation rhetorically. Argumentation, 34(3), 297–309. doi:10.1007/s10503-019-09501-2