There must be a villain: political threats, narrative thought, and political violence

References

• Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. (2002). On the social construction of moral universals: The ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 5–85. doi:10.1177/1368431002005001001
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2004). The origin of politics: An evolutionary theory of political behavior. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 707–723. doi:10.1017/S1537592704040460
   Google Scholar
• Anker, E. (2005). Villains, victims, and heroes: Melodrama, media, and September 11. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 22–37. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02656.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areanas, E. C. (2011). Villains in our mind: A psychological approach to literary and filmic villainy. In A. Fahraues & D. Yakali Camoglu (Eds.), Villains and Villainy: Embodiments of evil in literature, popular culture and media (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Rodopi Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5–28. doi:10.1080/17448689.2013.871911
   Google Scholar
• Beilock, S., & Lyons, I. (2012). Expertise and the mental simulation of action. In K. Markman, W. Klein, & J. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 21–34). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, K., & Jasper, J. M. (2018). Villains, victims, and heroes in character theory and affect control theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(3), 228–247. doi:10.1177/0190272518781050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., & Sobieraj, S. (2011). Understanding the rise of talk radio. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44, 762–767. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezdek, M. A., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). When narrative transportation narrows attention: Changes in attentional focus during suspenseful film viewing. Media Psychology, 20(1), 60–89. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1121830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1984). Attitudes toward history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, T. (2021). Tucker Carlson Tonight. Retrieved from https://video.foxnews.com/v/6284472978001/#sp=show-clips
   Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, P., & Shepperd, J. (2012). Preparedness, mental simulations, and future outlooks. In K. Markman, W. Klein, & J. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 21–34). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C. (2018). Monster metaphors in media coverage of the 2016 US presidential contest. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(4), 825–837. doi:10.1080/21565503.2018.1496120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crigler, A. N. (2001). The psychology of political communication. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desilet, G., & Appel, E. C. (2011). Choosing a rhetoric of the enemy: Kenneth Burke’s comic frame, warrantable outrage, and the problem of scapegoating. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 41(4), 340–362. doi:10.1080/02773945.2011.596177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2017). Media audience homophily: Partisan websites, audience identity and polarization processes. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulations, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48. doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1988). The 1987 distinguished lecture: A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion. Symbolic Interactionism, 11(2), 161–174. doi:10.1525/si.1988.11.2.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro-and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. doi:10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2021). Wanted: A good villain for the GOP. Deseret News. Retrieved from https://www.msnbc.com/ayman-mohyeldin/watch/is-trump-an-evil-genius-or-a-villainous-failure-132534341987
   Google Scholar
• Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2019). Partisan media, polarized audiences? A qualitative analysis of online political news and responses in the United States, UK, and The Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(3), 485–505. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edy022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2021). They are selling themselves out to the enemy! The content and effects of populist conspiracy theories. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(1), 38–56. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (2005). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26(4), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivie, R. L. (1987). Metaphor and the rhetorical invention of cold war “idealist. Communications Monographs, 54(2), 165–182. doi:10/1080/03637758709390224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. N., & Sobieraj, S. (2007). Narrative and legitimacy: U.S. Congressional debates about the nonprofit sector. Sociological Theory, 25(1), 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J. (2008). Uncivil disobedience: Studies in violence and democratic politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landreville, K. D., & LaMarre, H. L. (2011). Working through political entertainment: How negative emotion and narrative engagement encourage political discussion intent among young Americans. Communication Quarterly, 59(2), 200–220. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.563441
   Google Scholar
• Loseke, D. R. (2007). The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integrations. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(4), 661–688. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00096.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macafee, T. (2019). Biased into posting: Interactions with social media network political posts during the 2016 US presidential election. Communication Research Reports, 36(4), 326–337. doi:10.1080/08824096.2019.1669149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macafee, T., McLaughlin, B., & Rodriguez, N. (2019). Winning on social media: Candidate social-mediated communication and voting during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 1–10. doi:10.1177/2056305119826130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, M. (2015). Conservative consciousness and the press: The institutional contribution to the idea of the ‘liberal media’ in right-wing discourse. Critical Sociology, 41(3), 483–491. doi:10.1177/086920514528816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, D. B. (2020). The theory of informative fictions: A character-based approach to false news and other misinformation. Communication Theory, 31(4), 714–736. doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa002. Advanced online copy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B. (2020). Tales of conflict: Narrative immersion and political aggression in the United States. Media Psychology, 23(4), 579–602. doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1611452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., Holland, D., Thompson, B., & Koenig, A. (2020). Emotions and affective polarization: How enthusiasm and anxiety about presidential candidates affect interparty attitudes. American Politics Research, 48(2), 308–316. doi:10.1177/1532673X19891423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., & Macafee, T. (2019). Becoming a presidential candidate: Social media following and political identification. Mass Communication & Society, 22(5), 584–603. doi:10.1080/15205436.2019.1614196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., Velez, J. A., & Dunn, J. A. (2019). The political world within: How citizens process and experience political narratives. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 156–172. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1597635
   Google Scholar
• Mogg, K., McNamara, J., Powys, M., Rawlinson, H., Seiffer, A., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 14(3), 375–399. doi:10.1080/026999300378888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohyeldin, A. (2022). Live with Ayman Mohyeldin. Retrieved from https://www.msnbc.com/ayman-mohyeldin/watch/is-trump-an-evil-genius-or-a-villainous-failure-132534341987
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2016). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (2018). Hardwired for news: Affective intelligence and political attention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(4), 614–635. doi:10.1080/08838151.2018.1523169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, N. H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., & Monroe, K. R. (1998). Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 315–331. doi:10.1146/aanurev.polisci.1.1.315
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., & Aarøe, L. (2013). Politics in the mind’s eye: Imagination as a link between social and political cognition. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 275–293. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. (1998). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2015). Characters in politics. Storytelling, Self, Society, 11(1), 34–55. doi:10.13110/storselfsoci.11.1.0034
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Callahan, J. (2017). Deep stories, nostalgia narratives, and fake news: Storytelling in the Trump era. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 392–408. doi:10.1057/s41290-017-0037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 109–130. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, D.C:American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020). Breitbart’s attacks on mainstream media. Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means. New York, NY:Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, S. (2021). Report: Socialism attacks hurt Dems with Latino voters. Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/14/latino-voters-2020-election-524190
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2019). Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(38), 18888–18892. doi:10.1073/pnas.1908369116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S., & Amado, A. (2017). Populist communication by digital means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1330–1346. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, R. G., Peaslee, R. M., & Pettyman, D. (2020). It’s all about the villain! In R. M. Peaslee & R. G. Weiner (Eds.), The supervillains reader. Jackson, MS:University of Mississippi Press. (pp. xiv–xl).
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. (2021). Liberal media ratings plummeting as fictional horror they sold under Trump admin comes to an end. Townhall. Retrieved from https://townhall.com/columnists/adamweiss/2021/03/31/liberal-media-ratings-plummeting-as-fictional-horror-they-sold-under-trump-admin-comes-to-an-end-n2587133
   Google Scholar
• Woyton, M. (2021). Majority of Americans blame Trump for capitol insurrection. MSN. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/majority-of-americans-blame-trump-for-capitol-insurrection-poll/ar-BB1cODfE
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., & Erturk, O. F. (2021). Populism, violence and authoritarian stability: Necropolitics in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 42(7), 1–20. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.1896965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar