Generic tendencies in majority and non‐majority supreme court opinions: The case of justice Douglas

References

• Abraham , H. 1975 . The judicial process, an introductory analysis of the courts of the United States, England, and France, , 3rd ed. , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Black , E. 1965 . Rhetorical criticism: A study in method , New York : The McMillan Company .
   Google Scholar
• Campbell , K. K. and Jamieson , K. H. 1978 . Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action , Falls Church, Virginia : The Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Cardozo , B. N. 1931 . “ Law and literature ” . In Law and literature and other essays and addresses , New York : Harcourt, Brace and Company .
   Google Scholar
• Frye , N. 1957 . The anatomy of criticism: Four essays , Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Holsti , O. R. 1969 . Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities , Reading, Massachusetts : Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co. .
   Google Scholar
• Hughes , C. E. 1928 . The Supreme Court of the United States , Garden City, New York : Garden City Publishing Co., Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Jackson , P. 1969 . Dissent in the Supreme Court: A chronology , Norman, Oklahoma : University of Oklahoma Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kibler , R. J. and Barker , L. L. , eds. 1969 . Conceptual Frontiers in Speech Communication , New York : Speech Communication of America .
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc , D. R. 1976 . “Free speech” decisions and the legal process: The judicial opinion in context . Quarterly Journal of Speech, , 62 : 279 – 287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason , A. T. 1956 . Harlan Fiske Stone , New York : The Viking Press .
   Google Scholar
• Nichols , M. H. 1972 . “ Lincoln's first inaugural ” . In Methods of rhetorical criticism, a twentieth century perspective , Edited by: Scott , R. L. and Brock , B. L. New York : Harper and Row, Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Osgood , C. 1959 . “ The representational model and relevant research methods ” . In Trends in content analysis , Edited by: de Sola Pool , I. Urbana, Illinois : University of Illinois Press .
   Google Scholar
• Osgood , C. , Saporta , S. and Nunnally , J. C. 1956 . Evaluative assertion analysis . Litera , III : 47 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• Resnik , S. 1970 . Black and Douglas: Variations in dissent , New School for Social Research . Doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers , R. S. 1982 . “ The rhetoric of legal realism: William O. Douglas on the First Amendment ” . In Free speech yearbook: 1981 , Edited by: Kane , P. E. 23 – 35 . Annandale, Va. : Speech Communication Association . (a)
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers , R. S. 1982 . Absolutism and natural law argument: William O. Douglas on freedom of expression . Southern Speech Communication Journal , Fall (b), in press
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers , R. S. 1979 . Justice Douglas on the first amendment: Rhetorical genres in judicial opinions , University of Oklahoma . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers , R. S. and Barefield , P. A. 1980 . Computerized legal data retrieval in communication research: A report on the LEXIS system . Virginia Journal of Communication , September : 10 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Simons , H. 1978 . “Genre‐alizing” about rhetoric: A scientific approach ” . In Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action. , Edited by: Campbell , K. K. and Jamieson , K. H. Falls Church, Va. : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Simpson , A. W. B. 1961 . “ The Ratio Decidendi of a case and the doctrine of binding precedent ” . In Oxford essays in jurisprudence , Edited by: Guest , A. G. London : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stone , H. F. and Mason , A. T. , eds. 1956 . Harlan Fiske Stone , New York : The Viking Press .
   Google Scholar
• Williams , F. 1979 . Reasoning with statistics, , 2nd end. , New York : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston .
   Google Scholar
• Wolfarth , D. and John , F. 1961 . Kennedy in the tradition of inaugural speeches . Quarterly Journal of Speech, , 47 : 124 – 143 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar