75
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Pretrial publicity: Media coverage and guilt attributionFootnote1

Pages 154-169 | Published online: 21 May 2009

References

  • Anderson , N.H. 1974a . “ Information integration theory: A brief survey. ” . In Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology , Edited by: Krantz , D.H. , Atkinson , R.C. , Luce , R.D. and Suppes , P. Vol. 2 , San Fracisco, CA : W.H. Freeman .
  • Anderson , N.H. 1974b . “ Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. ” . In Advances in experimental social psychology , Edited by: Berkowitz , L. Vol. 7 , New York : Academic Press .
  • Blalock , H.M. Jr. 1972 . Social statistics, , (2nd ed.) , New York : McGraw Hill .
  • Bray , R.M. and Kerr , N.L. 1982 . “ Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom. ” . In The psychology of the courtroom. , Edited by: Bray , R.M. and Kerr , N.L. New York : Academic Press .
  • Davis , J.H. , Bray , R.M. and Holt , R.W. 1977 . “ The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A critical review. ” . In Law, justice, and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues. , Edited by: Tapp , J.L. and Levine , F.J. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston .
  • Eisen , S.V. and McArthur , L.Z. 1979 . Evaluating the sentenceing a defendant as a function of his salience and the perceiver's set. . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , : 48 – 52 .
  • Elwork , A. and Sales , B.D. 1980 . “ Psychological research on the jury and the trial processes. ” . In Modern legal medicine and forensic science. , Edited by: Petty , C. , Curran , W. and McGarry , L. Philadelphia : Davis .
  • Erlanger , H.S. 1970 . Jury research in America: Its past and future. . Law and Sociology Review , 4 : 345 – 370 .
  • Gerbassi , K.C. , Zuckerman , M. and Reis , H.T. 1977 . Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. . Psychological Bulletin , 84 : 323 – 345 .
  • Green , E. 1967 . The reasonable man: Legal fiction or psychological reality. . Law and Sociology Review , 2 : 241 – 257 .
  • Hoiberg , B.C. and Stires , L.K. 1973 . The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 3 : 267 – 275 .
  • Kaplan , M.F. 1975 . “ Information integration in social judgment: Interaction of judge and informational components. ” . In Human judgment and decision processes. , Edited by: Kaplan , M.F. and Schwartz , S. New York : Academic Press .
  • Kaplan , M.F. 1977a . “ Judgments by juries. ” . In Judgment and decisison process in applied settings. , Edited by: Kaplan , M. F. and Schwartz , S. New York : Academic Press .
  • Kaplan , M.F. 1977b . Discussion polarization effects in a modified jury decision paradigm: Informational influences. . Sociometry , 40 : 262 – 271 .
  • Kaplan , M.F. 1982 . “ Cognitive processes in the individual juror. ” . In The psychology of the courtroom. , Edited by: Bray , R.M. and Kerr , N.L. New York : Academic Press .
  • Kaplan , M.F. and Kemmerick , G.D. 1974 . Juror judgment as information integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 30 : 493 – 499 .
  • Kaplan , M.F. and Miller , C.E. 1977 . Judgments and group discussion: Effects of presentation and memory factors on polarization. . Sociology , 40 : 337 – 343 .
  • Kaplan , M.F. and Miller , L.E. 1978 . Reducing the effects of juror bias. . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 36 : 1443 – 1455 .
  • Kaplan , M.F. and Schersching , C. 1980 . New directions in psycholegal research. , Edited by: Lipsitt , P.D. and Sales , B.D. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold .
  • Kessler , J.B. 1975 . “ The social psychology of jury deliberations. ” . In The jury system in America: A critical overview. , Edited by: Simon , R.J. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
  • Kline , F.G. and Jess , P.H. 1966 . Prejudical publicity: Its effect on law school mock juries. . Journalism Quarterly , 43 : 113 – 116 .
  • Lawson , R.G. 1968 . Order of presentation as a factor in jury persuasion. . Kentucky Law Journal , 56 : 523 – 555 .
  • Lawson , R.G. 1969 . The law of primacy in the criminal courtroom. . Journal of Social Psychology , 77 : 121 – 131 .
  • Lawson , R.G. 1970 . Relative effectiveness of one‐sided and two‐sided communications in courtroom persuasion. . Journal of General Psychology , 82 : 3 – 16 .
  • Padawer‐Singer , A.M. and Barton , A.H. 1975 . “ The impact of pretrial publicity on juror's verdicts. ” . In The jury system in America: A critical overview. , Edited by: Simon , R.J. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
  • Riley , S.G. 1973 . Pretrial publicity: A field study. . Journalism Quarterly , 50 : 17 – 23 .
  • Rollings , H.E. and Blascovich , J. 1977 . The case of Patricia Hearst: Pretrial publicity and opinion. . Journal of Communication , 27 : 40 – 42 .
  • Simon , R.J. 1966 . Murder, juries, and the press. . Transaction , 3 : 40 – 42 .
  • Sohn , A.B. 1976 . Determining guilt or innocence of accused from pretrial news stories. . Journalism Quarterly , 53 : 100 – 105 .
  • Stone , V.A. 1969 . A primary effect in decision‐making by jurors. . The Journal of Communication. , 19 : 239 – 247 .
  • Tans , M.D. and Chaffee , S. 1966 . Pretrial publicity and juror prejudice. . Journalism Quarterly , 43 : 647 – 657 .
  • Taylor , S.E. and Fiske , S.T. 1978 . “ Salience, attention and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. ” . In Advances in experimental social psychology. , Edited by: Berkowitz . New York : Academic Press .
  • Walker , L. , Thibaut , J. and Andreoli , V. 1977 . Order of presentation at trial. . Yale Law Journal , 82 : 216 – 226 .
  • Weiten , W. and Diamond , S.S. 1979 . A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics. . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 71 – 93 .
  • Weld , H.P. and Roff , M. 1938 . A study of the formation of opinion based upon legal evidence. . American journal of Psychology , 51 : 609 – 628 .
  • Weld , H.P. and Danzing , E.R. 1940 . A study of the way in which a verdict is reached by a jury. . American journal of Psychology , 53 : 518 – 536 .
  • Wrightsman , L.S. 1978 . The American trial jury on trial: Empirical evidence and procedural modifications. . journal of Social Issues , 34 : 137 – 164 .
  • The author would like to thank James W. Coleman, Harold R. Kerbo, Edward Nelson, and Pat Tupac‐Yupanqui for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.