SPERM PROCESSING: GLASS WOOL COLUMN FILTRATION

REFERENCES

• Coetzee K, Erasmus EL, Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Lombard CJ (1994): Glass wool filter preparation of cryopreserved spermatozoa. Andrologia 26:33–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hankel RR, Franken DR, Lombard CJ, Schill WB (1994): Selective capacity of glass-wool filtration for the separation of human spermatozoa with condensed chromatin: a possible therapeutic modality for male-factor cases? J Assist Reprod Genet 11:395–400.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel R, Ichikawa T, Sanchez R, Miska W, Ohmori H, Schill WB (1997): Differentiation of ejacu-lates showing reactive oxygen species production by spermatozoa or leukocytes. Andrologia 29:295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmgren WJ, Jeyendran RS (1993): Synergistic effect of test-yolk treatment and glass wool filtra-tion of spermatozoa on the outcome of the hamster oocyte penetration assay. Hum Reprod 8:425–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeyendran RS, Holmgren WJ, Bielfeld P, Wentz AC (1992): Fertilizing capacity of various population of spermatozoa within an ejaculate. J Assist Reprod Genet 9:32–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeyendran RS, Perez-Pelaez M (1987): Pregnancy following insemination with glass wool filtered spermatozoa. Revista Latino Americana De Esterilidad Y Fertilidad 1:150–152.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyendran RS, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG (1986): Concentration of viable spermatozoa for artificial insemination. Fertil Steril 45:132–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K (1987): Separation of viable spermatozoa by standardized glass wool column. In Advances in fertility and sterility series, in vitro fertilization. Ratnam SS, Teoh E-S, Ng S-C (Eds). Carnforth, Lancs, UK: The Parthenon Pub-lishing Group, Vol. 2, Ch. 8, pp 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DE, Confino E, Jeyendran RS (1996): Glass wool column filtration versus Mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples. Fertil Steril 66:459–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katayama KP, Stehlik E, Jeyendran RS (1989): In vitro fertilization outcome: glass wool filtered sperm vs. swim up sperm. Fertil Steril 52:670–672.
   Google Scholar
• Larson KL, Brannian JD, Timm BK, Jost LK, Evenson DP (1999): Density gradient centrifugation and glass wool filtration of semen remove spermatozoa with damaged chromatin structure. Hum Reprod 14:2015–2019.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson JD, Comhaire F (1983): Filtration of human semen in glass wool column. In: Male reproduc-tion and fertility, Negro-Vilar A (Ed.). New York: Raven, pp 319.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson JD, Comhaire F, Emperaire JC (1980): Glass wool filtration of human semen: an homolo-gous artificial insemination (AIH). In: Clinics in andrology. Emperaire JC, Audebert A, Hafez ESE (Eds.). The Hague: Martinus Nighoff, pp 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson JD, Polakoski KL (1977): A glass wool column procedure for removing extraneous material from human ejaculate. Fertil Steril 28:178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana N, Jeyendran RS, Holmgren WJ, Rotman C, Zaneveld LJD (1989): Glass wool filtered sperma-tozoa and their oocyte penetrating capacity. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 6:280–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhemrev J, Jeyendran RS, Vermeiden JPW, Zaneveld LJD (1989): Human sperm selection by glass wool filtration and a two-layer, discontinuous percoll gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 51:685–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samura O, Miharu N, He H, Okamoto E, Ohama K (1997): Assessment of sex chromosome ratio and aneuploidy rate in motile spermatozoa selected by three different methods. Hum Reprod 12:2437–2442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez R, Concha M, Ichikawa T, Henkel R, Schill WB (1996): Glass wool filtration reduces reactive oxygen species by elimination of leucocytes in oligozoospermic patients with leukocytospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 13:489–494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez R, Villagran E, Risopatron J, Celis R (1994): Evaluation of nuclear maturity in human spermatozoa obtained by sperm-preparation methods. Andrologia 26:173–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman JK, Paulson JD, Lin KC (1981): Effect of glass wool filtration on ultrastructure of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 36:643–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterzik K, De Santo M, Uhlich S, Gagsteiger F, Strehler E (1998): Glass wool filtration leads to a higher percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosome: an ultrastructural analysis. Hum Reprod 13:2506–2511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh M, Revelard P, Bertrand E, Biramane J, Vanin AS, Englert Y (1997): Glass wool column filtration, an advantageous way of preparing semen samples for intracytoplasmic sperm injec-tion: an auto-controlled randomized study. Hum Reprod 12:509–513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Ven HH, Jeyendran RS, Al-Hasani S, Tunnerhoff A, Hoebbel K, Diedrich K, Krebs D, Perez-Pelaez M (1988): Glass wool column filtration of human semen: relation to swim up procedure and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 3:85–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdaguer S, Emperairf JC, Audebert A (1978): Modifications du sperme apres filtration sur laine de verre In: Comptes-Rendus du 1 symposium international sur l'insemination intra-conjugale et l'hypo-fertilite masculine-Bordeaux, mai 6–7.
   Google Scholar