Re/Familialization or De-Familialization: Differences in the Effects of Family Policies in Terms of Stratification

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alzúa, M. L., Cruces, G., & Ripani, L. (2010). Welfare programs and labor supply in developing countries. Experimental evidence from Latin America. (CEDLAS, Working Papers 0095, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata). Retrieved from http://www.cedlas.econo.unlp.edu.ar/wp/wp-content/uploads/doc_cedlas95.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Gruber, J., & Milligan, K. (2008). Universal childcare, maternal labor supply and family well-being. Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), 709–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick, A. (2011). The quantitative role of child care for female labor force participation and fertility (MPRA Paper 31713). Munich: University Library of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, D., & Currie, J. (2003). Preschool, day care and after school care: Who’s minding the kids?(NBER Working Papers 10670). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, F. G. (2004). The future of the welfare state: Crisis myths and crisis realities. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Y., & Won, S. (2014). Antecedents for labor force participation of mothers: Focusing on the influence of economic crisis. (in Korean). The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 23(3), 303–327.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J., & Lee, B. (2012). Increasing inequality and policy options. (in Korean). Democratic Society and Policy Studies, 23, 71–109.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (2000). The gender division of welfare: The impact of the British and German welfare states. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2010). Interpreting interaction effects. Retrieved from http://www.jeremydawson.co.uk/slopes.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917–926. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elborgh-Woytek, K., Newiak, M., Kochhar, K., Fabrizio, S., Kpodar, K., Wingender, P., … Schwartz, G. (2013). Women, work and the economy: Macroeconomic gains from gender equity. (IMF Staff Discussion Notes, SDN/13/10). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/∼/media/Websites/IMF/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2013/_sdn1310.ashx doi:10.5089/9781475566567.006
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagnani, J. (1998). Recent changes in family policy in France: Political trade-offs and economic constraints. In E. Drew, R. Emerek, & E. Mahonin (Eds.), Women, work and the family in Europe (pp. 58–65).‌ London; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farre, L., & Vella, F. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of gender role attitudes and its implications for female labour force participation. Economica, 80(318), 219–247. doi:10.1111/ecca.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferragina, E. (2017). Does family policy influence women’s employment? Reviewing the evidence in the Field. Political Studies Review, November, 1–16. doi:10.1177/1478929917736438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehringer, A., & Klasen, S. (2015). Labor force participation of women in the EU—What role do family policies play? cege Discussion Papers, No. 242. Göttingen, Germany: University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (cege).
   Google Scholar
• González, L. (2011). The effects of a universal child benefit‌. (Barcelona GSE Working Papers 574). Barcelona Graduate School of Economics. Retrieved from http://blogs.barcelonagse.eu/file/2709/download?token=uFJ8LbdX
   Google Scholar
• Gornick, J., & Meyers, M. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, S., & Stafford, F. (1992). Child care subsidies and labor supply in Sweden. The Journal of Human Resources, 27(1), 204–230. doi:10.2307/145917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haataja, A., & Valaste, M. (2012, September). Cutting child home care allowance in Finland? Paper presented at the ESPAnet Anniversary Conference, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Hegewisch, A., & Gornick, J. C. (2011). The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 119–138. doi:10.1080/13668803.2011.571395
   Google Scholar
• ISSP. (2012). Family and changing gender roles IV. Retrieved from https://www.gesis.org/issp/modules/issp-modules-by-topic/family-and-changing-gender-roles/2012
   Google Scholar
• Jaumotte, F. (2003). Labour force participation of women. OECD Economic Studies, 37, 51–107. doi:10.1787/eco_studies-v2003-art9-en
   Google Scholar
• Kammerman, S. (2010). Child, family and the state: The relationship between family policy and social protection policy. In S. Kamerman, S. Phipps & A. Ben-Arieh (Eds.), From child welfare to child well-being (pp. 429–437). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kennett, P., & Lendvai-Bainton, N. (2017). Handbook of European social policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, Y., & Guo, F. (2015). What can boost female labor force participation in Asia (IMF Working Paper, WP/15/56). doi:10.5089/9781498329750.001. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/˜/media/Websites/IMF/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/_wp1556.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Kosonen, T. (2014). To work or not to work? The effect of childcare subsidies on the labour supply of parents. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 14(3), 817–848. doi:10.1515/bejeap-2013-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M. (2002). The illusion of free choice: Ideals of care and child care policy in the Flemish and Dutch welfare states. In S. Michel & R. Mahon (Eds.), Child care at the crossroads (pp. 113–142). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laroque, G., & Salanie, B. (2005). Does fertility respond to financial incentives? (CEPR Discussion Paper 5007).
   Google Scholar
• Leira, A. (2002). Working parents and the welfare state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375. doi:10.1080/1461669032000127642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, A., & Ureta, M. (1990). Gender differences in wages and job turnover among continuously employed workers. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljestrom, R. (1978). Sweden. In S. Kamerman & A. Khan (Eds.), Family policy: Government and families in fourteen countries (pp.19–48). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (1994). She has other duties: Women, citizenship and social security. In S. Baldwin & J. Falkingham (Eds.), Social security and social change: New challenges (pp. 31–44)‌. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2000). Dilemmas in engendering citizenship. In B. Hobson (Ed.), Gender and citizenship in transition (pp. 33–83)‌. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E., & Penn, H. (2010). Why do childcare markets fail? Comparing England and the Netherlands. Public Policy Research, 17(1), 42–48. doi:10.1111/j.1744-540X.2010.00600.x
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2015). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 48–65. doi:10.1177/0958928715621712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luci, A., & Thevenon, O. (2011). The impact of family policy packages on fertility trends in developed countries. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00657603
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N. (2007). From subsidiarity to ‘free choice’: Child- and elder-care policy reform in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Social Policy & Administration, 41(6), 618–637. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00575.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. (2002). Does anyone have a “libre choix”? Subversive liberalism and the politics of French child care policy. In S. Michel & R. Mahon (Eds.), Child care policy at the crossroads (pp. 143–167)‌. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. J. (2013). Path shifting of the welfare state: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in western Europe. World Politics, 65(1), 73–115. doi:10.1017/S0043887112000251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morosow, K. (2017). Is the home-care-allowance disadvantaging single parents? Labor market outcome consequences of the Cash-for-Care benefit for single parents in Finland. Poster session 1 presented at Giornate di Studio sulla Popolazione. University of Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, I. (2011). Towards the marketization of early childhood education and care? Recent developments in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2,1–17‌. doi:10.15845/njsr.v2i0.109
   Google Scholar
• Naz, G. (2004). The impact of cash-benefit reform on parents? Labour force participation. Journal of Population Economics, 17(2), 369–383. doi:10.1007/s00148-003-0157-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009–2011). OECD Social Expenditure Database. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_DET
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Compare your income—Methodology and conceptual issues. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Rainer, H., Bauernschuster, S., Danzer, N., Fichtl, A., Hener, T., Holzner, C., & Reinkowski, J. (2014). Child benefit and child allowances in Germany: Their impact on family policy goals (CESifo D ICE Report 1/2014, 37-45). Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Repo, K. (2010). Finnish child home care allowance—Users' perspective and perceptions. In J. Sipilä, K. Repo, & T. Rissanen (Eds.), Cash for childcare: The consequences for caring mothers (pp. 46–64)‌. Cheltenham: Edward.
   Google Scholar
• Rissanen, T., & Knudsen, C. (2001). The child home care allowance and women’s labour force participation in Finland, 1985-1998: A comparison with Norway. Oslo: Norweign Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rønsen, M. (2009). Long-term effects of cash for childcare on mothers’ labour supply. LABOUR, 23(3), 507–533. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9914.2009.00456.x
   Google Scholar
• Rønsen, M., & Sundstrom, M. (2002). Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers–A comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. European Journal of Population/ Revue Europenne de Dmographie, 18(2), 121–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirle, T. (2015). The effect of universal child benefits on labor supply. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique, 48(2), 437–463. doi:10.1111/caje.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schøne, P. (2004). Labour supply effects of a cash-for-care subsidy. Journal of Population Economics, 17(4), 703–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipila, J., & Korpinen, J. (1998). Cash versus child care services in Finland. Social Policy and Administration, 32(3), 263–277. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó-Morvai, Á. (2014). Who benefits from child benefits? The labor supply effects of maternal cash benefit. Retrieved from http://hetfa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Szabo-Morvai_June2013_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vikat, A. (2004). Women’s labor force attachment and childbearing in Finland. (MPIDR Working Papers WP-2004-001). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vuri, D. (2016). Do childcare policies increase maternal employment? Subsidized childcare fosters maternal employment, but employment status, childcare quality, and availability matter. IZA World of Labor, 2016, 241. doi:10.15185/izawol.241
   Google Scholar