On the Fence: Dog Parks in the (Un)Leashing of Community and Social Capital

References

• Anderson, P.E. (2008). The powerful bond between people and pets: Our boundless connections to companion animals. Westport, CT: Praeger
   Google Scholar
• Arai, S. (2006). Where does social control end and social capital begin? Examining social space, conflict, and the politics of difference. Leisure/Loisir, 30(2), 329–340.
   Google Scholar
• Avrasin, M. (2008). Dog fight: Dog park supporters are often pitted against their neighbors. Parks and Recreation West-Virginia, 43(1
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, A.E., Russell, S.J., Furber, S.E., & Dobson, A.J. (2000). The epidemiology of dog walking: An unmet need for human and canine health. The Medical Journal of Australia, 175(11–12), 632–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A., & Katcher, A. (2003). Future directions in human–animal bond research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.G., & Rhodes, R.E. (2006). Relationships among dog ownership and leisure-time walking in Western Canadian adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruemmer, R. (2011, November 4). Study looks at human interaction at Montreal dog parks. The Gazette, p. A3.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, K.E., Adams, C.L., & Spiers, J. (2008). Sentinels of safety: Service dogs ensure safety and enhance freedom and well-being for families with autistic children. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12), 1642–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2009). Animals in the tourism and leisure experience. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(5–6), 409–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K., & Levinson, D. (2003). Encyclopedia of community: From the village to the virtual world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, J., Hart, L.A., & Boltz, R.P. (1988). The effects of service dogs on social acknowledgment of people in wheelchairs. Journal of Psychology, 122, 39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fridlund, A.J., & MacDonald, M. (1998). Approaches to Goldie: a field study of human approach responses to canine juvenescence. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 11(2), 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. D. (2006). Toward a critical examination of social capital within leisure contexts: From production and maintenance to distribution. Leisure/Loisir, 30(2), 357–367.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T.D., Parry, D.C., & Shinew, K.J. (2005). Building relationships, accessing resources: Mobilizing social capital in community garden contexts. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(4), 450–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, T.D., & Parry, D.C. (2008). Friendships developed subsequent to a stressful life event: The interplay of leisure, social capital, and health. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(2), 208–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéguen, N., & Ciccotti, S. (2008). Domestic dogs as facilitators in social interaction: An evaluation of helping and courtship behaviors. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 21, 339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, L.A., Hart, B.L., & Bergin, B. (1987). Socializing effects of service dogs in social interactions between strangers. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 1, 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, K., & Darling, M. (2011). Pets in the family: Practical approaches. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 47(5), 299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, V.S.S. (1995). Guidelines for designing and managing public open space. In D.W. Paxton & P. Boland (Eds.), Urban Animal Management: Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Australia. Artarmon, NSW: AVA Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Shepley, M., & Huang, C. (2009). Evaluation of off-leash dog parks in Texas and Florida: A study of use patterns, user satisfaction, and perception. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 314–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, A. (2009). Dog as self and other. Language and Ecology, 3(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mader, B., Hart, L.A., & Bergin, B. (1989). Social acknowledgements for children with disabilities: Effects of service dogs. Child Development, 60, 1529–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholas, J., & Collins, G.M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messent, P.R. (1983). Social facilitation of contact with other people by pet dogs. In A.H. Katcher & A.M. Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 37–46). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, C.M., Parry, D.C. & Glover, T.D. (2010). Playgroup politics: A critical social capital exploration of exclusion and conformity in mummies groups. Leisure Studies, 29(1), 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby, J. (1997). The pact for survival: Humans and their companions. Sydney, NSW: ABC Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York, NY: Marlowe & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, T. (2009). The business of urban animals survey: The facts and statistics on companion animals in Canada. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 50, 48–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, D.M., Sanders, C.R., & Cahill, S.E. (1991). Dogs and their people: Pet-facilitated interaction in a public setting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20(1), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J., Hart, L.A., & Boltz, R.P. (1993). The role of pet dogs in casual conversations of elderly adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(3), 265–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossbach, K.A., & Wilson, J.P. (1992). Does a dog's presence make a person appear more likeable? Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 5, 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sable, P. (1995). Pets, attachment, and well-being across the life cycle. Social Work, 40(3), 334–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell, J. (1995). The domestic dog. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, E. (2005). Delivering communitas: Wilderness adventure and the making of community. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), 255–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slinger, H.(Director & Co-Producer) & Palmer, M.(Co-Producer). (2013). Dog dazed. [Documentary]. Vancouver, BC: Bountiful Films.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, O. (2010). What a dog can do: Children with autism and therapy dogs in social interaction. Ethos, 38(1), 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2012). Focus on geography series, 2011 census. (. Catalogue number: 98-310- XWE2011004). . Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca
   Google Scholar
• Tissot, S. (2011). Of dogs and men: The making of spatial boundaries in a gentrifying neighborhood. City & Community, 10(3), 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toohey, A.M., & Rock, M.J. (2011). Unleashing their potential: A critical realist scoping review of the influence of dogs on physical activity for dog-owners and non-owners. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V.W. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, D.L. (2004). The facilitation of social interactions by domestic dogs. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 17, 340–352.
   Google Scholar
• Westgarth, C., Pinchbeck, G.L., Bradshaw, J.W. S., Dawson, S., Gaskell, R.M., & Christley, R.M. (2008). Dog-human and dog-dog interactions of 260 dog-owning households in a community in Cheshire. The Veterinary Record, 162, 436–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., & Rowe, S. (1992). Companions in the park: Laurel Canyon Dog Park. Landscape, 31, 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., & Bosch, D. (2007). More than a furry companion: The ripple effect of companion animals on neighborhood interactions and sense of community. Society & Animals, 15(1), 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science and Medicine, 61(6), 1159–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar