Predicting Behavioral Intentions to Comply with Recommended Leave No Trace Practices

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Driver, B.L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Science, 13, 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Driver, B.L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (1999a). Predictive validity of the theory of planned behavior: The role of questionnaire format and social desirability. Journal of Community & Applied Psychology, 9, 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (1999b). The theory of planned behavior: Assessment of predictive validity and “perceived control.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Uzzell, D. (1999). International trends in heritage and environmental interpretation: Future directions for Australian research and practice. Journal of Interpretation Research, 4(1), 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B., & Stewart, S. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance in a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 287–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D.K. S., & Cheung, S.F. (1998). An examination of premarital sexual behavior among college students in Hong Kong. Psychology and Health, 13, 805–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, S.F., Chan, D.K. S., & Wong, Z.S. Y. (1999). Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and Behavior, 31(5), 587–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W.A., & Finley, J.C. (2007). Determinants of water conservation intention in Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. Society and Natural Resources, 20, 613–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D.N. (1989). Low-impact recreational practices for wilderness and backcountry. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D.N. (1992). Modeling wilderness campsites: Factors that influence amount of impact. Environmental Management, 16, 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D.N. (1998). Recreation research agenda: Priority research questions. Missoula, MT: Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D.N., Hammond, T., & McCool, S. (1997). Information quality and communication effectiveness: Low-impact messages on wilderness trailside bulletin boards. Leisure Sciences, 19(1), 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confer, J., Absher, J., Graefe, A., & Hille, A. (1999). Relationship between visitor knowledge of “leave no trace” minimum impact practices and attitudes toward selected management actions. Paper presented at the 1998 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, Bolton Landing, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, M., & Armitage, C.J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method; 2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, J.R. (1979). Communicating with the wilderness user. Bulletin Number 28. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Sydney, Australia: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S.H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Golden, CO: North American Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W.E., & Cole, D.N. (1998). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H., & Lucas, R.C. (1990). Wilderness management (2nd ed.). Golden, CO: North American Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K.A., Preseley, J., & Bialeschki, M.D. (2004). Theory in recreation and leisure research: Reflections from the editors. Leisure Sciences, 26, 411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A.N. (1986/87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I., & Daigle, J. (2001). Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23, 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F.G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(4), 598–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F.G., Hubner, G., & Bogner, F.X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2150–2170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, J.R. (1999). Ecotourism as environmental learning. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004). Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists’ perceptions of setting density. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(2), 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, S-P. (2006). Predicting intention to save water: Theory of planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability, and perceived efficiency of alternative solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(11), 2803–2824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, Y-F., & Marion, J.L. (2000). Recreation impacts and management in wilderness: A state-of-knowledge review. Paper presented at the Wilderness Science in a time of change conference, Missoula, MT.
   Google Scholar
• Little, T.D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J.R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 192–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R.E. (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (2nd ed.). Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, J.L., & Reid, S.E. (2001). Development of the United States leave no trace program: An historical perspective. In M.B. Usher (Ed.), Enjoyment and understanding of the national heritage (pp. 81–92). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Natural Heritage & the Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Borrie, W., & Harding, J. (2001). Basic knowledge of factors that limit the practice of low-impact behaviors. Draft report on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, MT: University of Montana.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, R.K. (2006). Toward an understanding of noncompliant behavior in outdoor recreation: Linking the theory of planned behavior to off-leash dogs at William B. Ulmstead State Park. (Unpublished master's thesis). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R.B., & Ham, S.H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16, 467–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramthun, R. (1998). Information use in the trip planning process: A qualitative analysis of backpackers. Paper presented at the Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, Bolton Landing, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Reuhrwein, J.R. (1998). Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and reported behavior of southern Utah backcountry recreationalists. (Unpublished master's thesis). Utah State University, Logan, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J.W. (1992). Use of persuasion to reduce resource impacts and visitor conflicts. In M. J. Manfredo, (Ed.), Influencing human behavior: Theory and application in recreation, tourism, and natural resources management. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
   Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J.W., & Berrier, D. (1982). A comparison of the effectiveness of two communication strategies in dispersing wilderness campers. Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, C. (1991). Low-impact recreational practices: Assessing and improving wilderness user knowledge, behavioral intentions, and behavior. (Unpublished master's thesis). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, D.J., & O’Leary, J.E. (1995). The theory of planned behavior: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traifmow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Finlay, K. (2002). Evidence that perceived behavior control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 101–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagias, W.M. (2009). An examination of the leave no trace visitor education program in two U.S. National Park Service units. (Doctoral dissertation). Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
   Google Scholar
• Vagias, W.M., Powell, R., Moore, D., & Wright, B. (2012). Development, psychometric qualities, and cross-validation of the Leave No Trace Attitudinal Inventory and Measure (LNT AIM). Journal of Leisure Research, 44(2), 234–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, C., Winter, G., & Fried, J. (2005). Predicting homeowners’ approval of fuel management at the wildland-urban interface using the theory of reasoned action. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, V. (1999). The Aldo Leopold wilderness research institute: A national wilderness research program in support of wilderness management. Paper presented at the Wilderness science in a time of change conference, Missoula, MT.
   Google Scholar