Adolescent Summer Camp Volunteers' Attitudes Toward Peers with Disabilities

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookman, L., Boettcher, M., Klein, E., Openden, D., Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2003). Facilitating social interactions in a community summer camp setting for children with autism. The Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(4), 249–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents' relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 363–394). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H.K., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Lysaght, R., & Burge, P. (2011). Students' behavioural intentions towards peers with disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24(4), 322–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. M., Ferguson, J. E., & Herzinger, C. V. (2005). Peers' attitudes toward autism differ across sociometric groups: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 17(3), 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, A.B. (1996). Sample-size calculations for Cohen's kappa. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 150–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., Hughes, C., Copeland, S. R., & Breen, C. (2001). Differences between high school students who do and do not volunteer to participate in a peer interaction program. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 26(4), 229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., Melekoglu, M. A., & Kurkowski, C. (2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(4), 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., Chung, Y., & Stanton-Chapman, T. L. (2010). Peer interactions of students with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A map of the intervention literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 35(3–4), 63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobigo, V., Ouellette-Kunz, H., Lysaght, R., & Martin, L. (2012). Shifting our conceptualization of social inclusion. Stigma Research and Action, 2(2), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. S. (1966). Social attitudes and sociological enquiry. The British Journal of Sociology, 17(4), 341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, S., & Scior, K. (2012). Public attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative comparison of white British and South Asian people. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25, 177–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 345–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, M. A. (2004). “Being a ‘doer’ instead of a ‘viewer’”: The role of inclusive leisure contexts in determining social acceptance for people with disabilities. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(2), 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, M. A., & Lashua, B. (2002). Constructing social acceptance in inclusive leisure contexts: The role of individuals with disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 36(1), 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, M. A., & O'Brien, M. B. (2007). The mixed bag of inclusion: An examination of an inclusive camp using contact theory. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 41(3), 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, M. A., & Parr, M. G. (2008). “Come on in, but not too far:” Social capital in an inclusive leisure setting. Leisure Sciences, 30(5), 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, M.A., & Wilhite, B. (2000). The meaning of disability: Implications for inclusive leisure services for youth with and without disabilities. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18(3), 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Eller, A., & Abrams, D. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew's reformulated intergroup contact model and the Common Ingroup Identity Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 229–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Amsel, R., Robillard, K., Sabourin, S., & Wright, J. (1997). Personality, attentional focus, and novelty effects: Reactions to peers with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 42(3), 209–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. (1999). According to their peers: Inclusion as high school students see it. Mental Retardation, 37, 458–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flick, U. (2008). Managing quality in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J. A., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M.,... Houlette, M. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 692–402.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, R. R. (2010). Social desirability. In Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 1–2). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, M. D. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped students. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Huckstadt, L. K., & Shutts, K. (2014). How young children evaluate people with and without disabilities. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 99–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & McDonald, M. L. (2009). The Special Olympics: Sporting or social event? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33(3), 143–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). The surprisingly limited malleability of implicit racial evaluations. Social Psychology, 41(3), 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalymon, K., Gettinger, M., & Hanley-Maxwell, C. (2010). Middle school boys' perspectives on social relationships with peers with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31(4), 305–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R. (Ed.). (1996). Leisure. Boston, MA: Allyn and Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H., & Horn, E. M. (2004). Including students with severe disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiber, D. A. (1999). Leisure experiences and human development: A dialectical interpretation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiber, D. A., Walker, G. J., & Mannell, R. C. (2011). A social psychology of leisure (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Lenton, A. P., Bruder, M., & Sedikides, C. (2009). A meta-analysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., & McPherson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for improving disability awareness and social inclusion of children and young people with cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(6), 809–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., & McPherson, A. (2012). Experiences of social exclusion and bullying at school among children and youth with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(2), 101–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. F. (1994). Indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 103–137.
   Google Scholar
• Magiati, I., Dockrell, J. E., & Logotheti, A. (2002). Young children's understanding of disabilities: The influence of development, context and cognition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 409–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McClendon, M. J. (1974). Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice. Sociological Focus, 7(4), 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., DeWit, D., King, G., Miller, L., & Killip, S. (2004). High school-aged youths' attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 51, 287–313.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, J. L., Feyes, K. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2011). Contact and knowledge as predictors of attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5), 579–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, R., & Burgman, I. (2009). Friendship experiences among children with disabilities who attend mainstream Australian schools. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. F., & Campbell, J. M. (2008). Information source affects peers' initial attitudes toward autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29(3), 189–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvihill, B. A., Cotton, J. N., & Gyaben, S. L (2004). Best practices for inclusive child and adolescent out-of-school care: A review of the literature. Family & Community Health, 27(1), 52–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, I., Ridenour, C. S., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G. M. P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 167–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. E., Sin, M., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2010). Understanding attitudes toward people with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 152A, 2185–2192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L. (2006). Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call to action research. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 577–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 770–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou, C., Evaggelinou, C., & Block, M. (2014). The effect of a disability camp program on attitudes towards the inclusion of children with disabilities in a summer sport and leisure activity camp. International Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, D. A., & Ellison, C. G. (1995). Interracial contact and Black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74(1), 205–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, C. C., McGuigan, W. M., & Katzev, A. R. (2000). Measuring program outcomes: Using retrospective pretest methodology. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3). 341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, H. D. (2010). Psychological issues in chronically ill adolescents. In H. Omar, D. E. Greydanus, D. R. Patel & J. Merrick (Eds.), Adolescence and chronic illness: A public health concern (pp. 151–164). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, S. R., & Chan, F. (2006). The development and psychometric validation of the disability attitude implicit association test. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(3), 202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruett, S. R., Lee, E., Chan, F., Wang, M. H., & Lane, F. J. (2008). Dimensionality of the contact with disabled persons scale: Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51(4), 210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rillotta, F., & Nettelbeck, T. (2007). Effects of an awareness program on attitudes of students without an intellectual disability towards persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Developmental Disability, 32(1), 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti, Z. S. (2011). “That's how we do it”: Friendship work between high school students with and without autism or developmental disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1), 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossow-Kimball, B., & Goodwin, D. L. (2014). Inclusive lecture experiences of older adults with intellectual disabilities at a senior centre. Leisure Studies, 33(3), 322–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleien, S. J., Miller, K. D., & Shea, M. (2009). Searches for the best practices in inclusive recreation: Preliminary findings. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 27(1), 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Scior, K. (2011). Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2164–2182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (1999). Everybody belongs: Changing negative attitudes toward classmates with disabilities. Florence, KY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sibthorp, J., Paisley, P., Gookin, J., & Ward, P. (2007). Addressing response-shift bias: Retrospective pretests in recreation research and evaluation. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(2), 295–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siperstein, G. N., Glick, G. C., & Parker, R. C. (2009). Social inclusion of children with intellectual disabilities in a recreational setting. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siperstein, G. N., Norins, J., & Mohler, A. (2007). Social acceptance and attitude change: Fifty years of research. In J. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick & J. Rojahn (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 133–154). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Siperstein, G. N., Parker, R. C., Bardon, J. N., & Widaman, K. F. (2007). A national study of youth attitudes toward the inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, 73(4), 435–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siperstein, G. N., Parker, R. C., Noris, J., & Widaman, K. F. (2011). A national study of Chinese youths' attitudes toward students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Published online. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01382.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, J. J., & Byrne, M. K. (2013). The effects of a multi-component higher-functioning anti-stigma program on adolescent boys. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 43, 2816–2629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurber, C. A., Scanlin, M. M., Scheuler, L., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Youth development outcomes of the camp experience: Evidence for multidimensional growth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Page-Gould, E. (2015). Contact between groups. In M. Mikulincer, P. Shaver, J. Dovidio & J. Simpson. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 535–560). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wolf, C., Petzel, T.,... Jackson, J. S. (2004). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 211–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Klift, E., & Kunc, N. (2002). Hell-bent on helping: Benevolence, friendship, and the politics of help. In J. Thousand, R. Villa & A. Nevin. (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (2nd ed., pp. 21–28). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Vilchinsky, N., Werner, S., & Findler, L. (2010). Gender and attitudes toward people using wheelchairs: A multidimensional perspective. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53(3), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. H. (1998). Factors influencing preferences for persons with disabilities: A conjoint analysis and cross-cultural comparison. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(1), 414B.
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S. W., Wong, F. Y., & Scheltema, K. E. (1989). Improving intergroup relations: Comparative effects of anticipated cooperation and helping on attraction for an aid-giver. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(3), 213–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuker, H. E., & Hurley, M. K. (1987). Contact with and attitudes toward persons with disabilities: The measurement of intergroup contact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 32(3), 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar