Online-to-Offline Interactions and Online Community Life Cycles: A Longitudinal Study of Shared Leisure Activities

References

• Anderson, P., & Perrin, A. (2016, September 7). 13% of Americans don't use the internet. Who are they? Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/07/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. C. (2002). Audience-specific online community design. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 64–68. doi:10.1145/505248.505275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., Poole, M., Henry, K., Wheelan, S. C., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35(1), 73–105. doi:10.1177/1046496403259757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (2007). Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human–computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1881–1893. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9(4), 415–437. doi:10.1177/001872675600900403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. (2002). Research through participant observation in tourism: A creative solution to the measurement of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction among tourists. Journal of Travel Research, 41(4), 4–14. doi:10.1177/0047287502041001002
   Google Scholar
• Calvey, D. (2008). The art and politics of covert research: Doing “situated ethics” in the field. Sociology, 42(5), 905–918. doi:10.1177/0038038508094569
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, S. (2010). Managing the wildlife tourism experience: The importance of tour leaders. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12(3), 219–236. doi:10.1002/jtr.747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, D., Cosley, D., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Suri, S. (2008, August). Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 160–168). New York: Association of Computer Machinery (ACM). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1401890&picked=prox
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L., & Van Doren, C. (1976). Amusement parks, theme parks and municipal leisure services: Contrasts in adaptation to cultural change. Journal of Physical Education & Recreation, 47(8), 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Desanctis, G., & Roach, M. (2002). Age, size, and contribution dynamics in online learning communities. In Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Dewalt, K., & Dewalt, B. (2002). Participant observation. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M., Schmitt, M., & Heinemann, G. (2001). Informal roles and the stages of interdisciplinary team development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(3), 281–295. doi:10.1080/13561820120068980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274–309. doi:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M. (1982). A theory of group solidarity. Research in Marketing, 1, 285–324.
   Google Scholar
• Hetcher, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. London, England: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iriberri, A., & Leroy, G. (2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(2), 11. doi:10.1145/1459352.1459356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research, 8(2), 189–203. doi:10.1108/13522750510592454
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526–537. doi:10.1177/0146167201275002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2010). The computer-mediated communication network: Exploring the linkage between the online community and social capital. New Media & Society, 12(5), 711–727. doi:10.1177/1461444809343568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, L. (2009). Community in a recreational setting. Leisure Sciences, 11(4), 303–322. doi:10.1080/01490408909512229
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y -C., Chalip, L., & Green, C. (2016). The essential role of sense of community in a youth sport program. Leisure Sciences, 38(5), 461–481. doi:10.1080/01490400.2015.1093973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P. (2006). Between overt and covert research: Concealment and disclosure in an ethnographic study of commercial hospitality. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 541–561. doi:10.1177/1077800405282801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P., & Bray, J. (2008). Tour guiding, organizational culture and learning: Lessons from an entrepreneurial company. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10(5), 467–479. doi:10.1002/jtr.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & Hars, A. (1997). Evolution of a virtual community: Understanding design issues through a longitudinal study. In J. Degross, & K. Kumar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th international conference on information systems (pp. 59–74). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2005). A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 201–232. doi:10.1145/1067860.1067864
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., & Zanolla, D. (2013). When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1565–1571. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meetup. (2017). Retrieved from http://meetup.com/about
   Google Scholar
• Milman, A. (2009). Evaluating the guest experience at theme parks: An empirical investigation of key attributes. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(4), 373–387. doi:10.1002/jtr.710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkono, M., & Markwell, M. (2014). The application of netnography in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 289–291. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103–127. doi:10.2307/3088904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2002). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. Press/Politics, 7(3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80–97. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 347–356. doi:10.1080/01449290110084683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., Sumner, E., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2015). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Wang, Z. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 20–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 337–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 370–391. doi:10.1111/pere.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, E. (1982). Social inquiry and the autonomy of the individual. In M. Bulmer (Ed.), Social research ethics: An examination of the merits of covert participant observation (pp. 125–141). London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stats, Internet Live (2017). Retrieved from http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B., & Jensen, M. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Management, 2(4), 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Valtchanov, B. L., Parry, D. C., Glover, T. D., & Mulcahy, C. M. (2016). A whole new world: Mothers' technologically mediated leisure. Leisure Sciences, 38(1), 50–67. doi:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vase, J., Dyar, R., & Timmons, N. (2004). Skill level and recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders. Leisure Sciences, 26(2), 215–225. doi:10.1080/01490400490432145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relationships. In J. A. Daly, & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 443–480). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L., & Danylchuk, K. (2011). Playing our way: Contributions of social groups to women's continued participation in golf. Leisure Sciences, 33(5), 366–381. doi:10.1080/01490400.2011.606778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarnal, C. M. (2004). Missing the boat? A playfully serious look at a group cruise tour experience. Leisure Sciences, 26(4), 349–372. doi:10.1080/01490400490502345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar