One Day of #Feminism: Twitter as a Complex Digital Arena for Wielding, Shielding, and Trolling talk on Feminism

References

• Banyai, M., & Glover, T. (2012). Evaluation research methods on travel blogs. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3), 267–277. doi:10.1177/0047287511410323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C., & Jane, E. A. (2016). Cultural studies: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berbary, L. A., & Richmond, L. P. (2011). The dangerous deconstruction of gender: Narrative inquiry of masculinities in a popular children's book. Annals of Leisure Research, 14(2–3), 194–208. doi:10.1080/11745398.2011.615715
   Google Scholar
• Berdychevsky, L., & Nimrod, G. (2015). ‘Let's talk about sex’: Discussions in seniors’ online communities. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(4), 467–484. doi:10.1080/00222216.2015.11950371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, A. (2012). From the Blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 529–549. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. (2014). Trolls just wanna have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandralal, L., Rindfleish, J., & Valenzuela, F. (2015). An application of travel blog narratives to explore memorable tourism experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(6), 680–693. doi:10.1080/10941665.2014.925944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, K. K. (2015). “It's like she's eager to be verbally abused”: Twitter, trolls, and (en)gendering disciplinary rhetoric. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 356–358. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1008750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users' constructions of leisure and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behaviour, 60, 233–244. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consalvo, M. (2012). Cyberfeminism. In Encyclopedia of new media, 109–110. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://study.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/Ch17_Cyberfeminism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M. (2011). Bloggerati, Twitterati: How blogs and twitter are transforming popular culture. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2009). Rethinking cyberfeminism(s): Race, gender, and embodiment. Women's Studies Quarterly, 37(1/2), 101–124. doi:10.1353/wsq.0.0158
   Google Scholar
• Delamere, F., & Shaw, S. (2008). “They see it as a guy's game”: The politics of gender in digital games. Leisure/Loisir, 32(2), 279–302. doi:10.1080/14927713.2008.9651411
   Google Scholar
• Drüeke, R., & Zobl, E. (2016). Online feminist protest against sexism: The German-language hashtag #aufschrei. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 35–54. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1093071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, K. (2005). A guide to feminist advocacy. Gender and Development, 13(3), 10–20. doi:10.1080/13552070512331332293
   Google Scholar
• Fichman, P., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2016). Online trolling and its perpetrators: Under the cyberbridge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Filep, S., Cao, D., Jiang, M., & DeLacy, T. (2013). Savouring tourist experiences after a holiday. Leisure/Loisir, 37(3), 191–203. doi:10.1080/14927713.2013.842731
   Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2015). Twitter and health science research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37(10), 1269–1283. doi:10.1177/0193945914565056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, A. (2014). Twitter feminism and the next wave: An interview with Mikki Kendall. Democratic Left, 41(4), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gajjala, R. (2003). South Asian digital diasporas and cyberfeminist webs: Negotiating globalization, nation, gender, and information technology design. Contemporary South Asia, 12(1), 41–56. doi:10.1080/0958493032000123362
   Google Scholar
• Genoe, M. R., Liechty, T., Marston, H. R., & Sutherland, V. (2016). Blogging into retirement: Using qualitative online research methods to understand leisure among baby boomers. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(1), 15–34. doi:10.18666/jlr-2016-v48-i1-6257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardaker, C., & McGlashan, M. (2015). “Real men don't hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawai'i international Conference on Systems Sciences, pp. 1–10. Los Amalmitos, CA: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Thornton, K. M., & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2010). Conversational tagging in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 173–178. Toronto, Ontario: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jane, E. A. (2012). “You're an ugly, whorish, slut”: Understanding e-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 531–546. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.741073
   Google Scholar
• Jane, E. A. (2014). “Back to the kitchen, cunt”: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 28(4), 558–570. doi:10.1080/10304312.2014.924479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Micro-blogging as online word of mouth branding. In Proceedings of the 27th international Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3859–3864). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2007). The feminist practice of content analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Beber & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 223–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lehto, X. Y., Park, O., Fu, X., & Lee, G. (2014). Student life stress and leisure participation. Annals of Leisure Research, 17(2), 200–217. doi:10.1080/11745398.2014.902293
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, S. (1999). (En)Gendering the digital body: Feminism and the internet. Hecate, 25(2), 36.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, L. K. (2014). What can feminism learn from new media? Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(3), 293–297. doi:10.1080/14791420.2014.926244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattar, Y. (2003). Virtual communities and hip-hop music consumers in Singapore: Interplaying global, local and subcultural identities. Leisure Studies, 22(4), 283–300. doi:10.1080/02614360310001594168
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, J. K. L., & Parry, D. C. (2016). Women's leisure as political practice: A feminist analysis of Orange Is the New Black. Leisure Sciences, 21, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• McCosker, A. (2014). Trolling as provocation: YouTube's agonistic publics. Convergence, 20(2), 201–217.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies, R. (2007). Virtual Backlash: Representations of men's “rights” and feminist “wrongs” in cyberspace. In D. E. Chunn, S. B. Boyd, & H. Lessard (Eds.), Reaction and resistance: Feminism, law, and social change (pp. 65–97). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (2017). Merriam-Webster's 2017 words of the year: Feminism, dotard, gaffe, syzygy, and 6 more of the top lookups in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/word-of-the-year-2017-feminism/feminism
   Google Scholar
• Mislov, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y., Onnela, J., & Rosenquist, J. N. (2011). Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/viewFile/2816/3234
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. (2010). What do people ask their social networks, and why? A Survey study of status message Q&A behavior. In CHI 2010 (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems), pp. 1739–1748. Atlanta: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, M. L., & Mair, H. (2016). Blogging poverty tourism: A critical discourse analysis. Tourism Analysis, 21(5), 465–479. doi:10.3727/108354216X14653218477525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munster, A. (1999). Is there postlife after postfeminism? Tropes of technics and life in cyberfeminism. Australian Feminist Studies, 14(29), 119–129. doi:10.1080/08164649993371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzzaffar, S. (2016). What good is declaring broadband a “basic service” without regulating retail prices? CBC News, December 28. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/broadband-basic-service-1.3913627
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007 doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nimrod, G. (2014). The benefits of and constraints to participation in seniors' online communities. Leisure Studies, 33(3), 247–266. doi:10.1080/02614367.2012.697697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovadia, S. (2009). Exploring the potential of Twitter as a research tool. Behavioural and Social Sciences Librarian, 28(4), 202–205. doi:10.1080/01639260903280888
   Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C., Glover, T. D., & Mulcahy, C. M. (2013). From “stroller stalker” to “momancer”: Courting friends through a social networking site for mothers. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(1), 22–45. doi:10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i1-2941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C., & Light, T. (2014). Fifty shades of complexity: Exploring technologically mediated leisure and women's sexuality. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(1), 38–57. doi:10.1080/00222216.2014.11950312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny, L. (2014, June 8). Every single female writer I know has had threats of violence and rape, along with barrages of harassment. Every. Single. One. yes all women [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/PennyRed/status/475759250036510720
   Google Scholar
• Plant, S. (1997). Zeros and ones. London: 4th Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. (2014, June 18). How social media is changing language. Oxford Words Blog. Retrieved from http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2014/06/social-media-changing-language/
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2002). Mediating practices: Women with/in cyberspace. In J. Armitage & J. Roberts (Eds.), Living with cyberspace: Technology and society in the 21st century. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2010). Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 357–370. doi:10.1177/0165551510365390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, D. L., Colistra, C. M., & Evans, K. E. (2015). Social media sites as a means of coping with a threatened social identity. Leisure Sciences, 37(1), 20–38. doi:10.1080/01490400.2014.935835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharaievska, I., & Stodolska, M. (2015). Redefining boundaries in families through social networking leisure. Leisure Sciences, 37(5), 431–446. doi:10.1080/01490400.2015.1021882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, E. K., & Lashua, B. D. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: Tuning in to popular leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 32(2), 245–258. doi:10.1080/14927713.2008.9651409
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag?: A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication and Society, 14(6), 872–895. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, C., & Paisley, K. (2013). Two women, a bottle of wine, and The Bachelor: Duoethnography as a means to explore experiences of femininity in a leisure setting. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(5), 695–716. doi:10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i5-4370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, C. (2011). “Here's a project: Troll! Data! Analysis!” SuperOpinionated, February 8. Retrieved from http://superopnionated.dreamhosters.com/2011/02/08/here-is-a-project-troll-data-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, K., & Hodges, S. (2009). Introduction: Situating technology. Women's Studies Quarterly, 37(1 & 2), 11–18. doi:10.1353/wsq.0.0162
   Google Scholar
• Twitter Inc. (2016). Twitter usage: Company facts. Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/company
   Google Scholar
• Valtchanov, B. L., Parry, D. C., Glover, T. D., & Mulcahy, C. M. (2014). Neighborhood at your fingertips: Transforming community online through a Canadian social networking site for mothers. Gender, Technology and Development, 18(2), 187–217. doi:10.1177/0971852414529481
   Google Scholar
• Vinagre, M. (2008). Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges. Computer Education, 50(3), 1022–1036. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2003). Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American, 289, 42–47. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0803-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wearing, S. L., Wearing, J., McDonald, M., & Wearing, M. (2015). Leisure in a world of ‘com-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-puter-puter, puter games’: A father and son conversation. Annals of Leisure Research, 18(2), 219–234. doi:10.1080/11745398.2014.996764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274–291. doi:10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media, continuum discourse series. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., & Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 243–252. Raleigh, NC: ACM.
   Google Scholar