Ordinary Political Conversation in Seemingly Nonpolitical Leisure: All Talk and No Action?

References

• Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 784–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breese, E. B. (2011). Mapping the variety of public spheres. Communication Theory, 21(2), 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, K. A., Payne, L., & Liechty, T. (2017). An exploration of older men's social lives and well-being in the context of a coffee group. Leisure Sciences, 39(3), 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2017). Reluctance to talk about politics in face-to-face and Facebook settings: Examining the impact of fear of isolation, willingness to self-censor, and peer network characteristics. Mass Communication and Society, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y., & Macy, M. (2015). Why do liberals drink lattes? American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1473–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (2000). Where can Americans talk politics: Civil society, intimacy, and the case for deep citizenship. The Communication Review, 4(1), 65–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990a). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Struggle over needs: Outline of a socialist-feminist critical theory of late capitalist political culture. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare (pp. 199–225). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. D., Shinew, K. J., & Parry, D. C. (2005). Association, sociability, and civic culture: The democratic effect of community gardening. Leisure Sciences, 27(1), 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2012). Beyond “political” communicative spaces: Talking politics on the wife swap discussion forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(1), 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2014). Discursive equality and everyday talk online: The impact of “superparticipants.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 625–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemingway, J. L. (1996). Emancipating leisure: The recovery of freedom in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(1), 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211–242). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millward, P., Widdop, P., & Halpin, M. (2017). A “different class”? Homophily and heterophily in the Social Class Networks of Britpop. Cultural Sociology, 11(3), 318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, C. M., Parry, D. C., & Glover, T. D. (2010). Play‐group politics: A critical social capital exploration of exclusion and conformity in mothers groups. Leisure Studies, 29(1), 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., & Frederick, E. (2004). Peer and social influence on opinion expression: Combining the theories of planned behavior and the spiral of silence. Communication Research, 31, 669–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1977). Turbulences in the climate of opinion: Methodological applications of the spiral of silence theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rojek, C. (2010). The labour of leisure: The culture of free time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Son, J., Yarnal, C., & Kerstetter, D. (2010). Engendering social capital through a leisure club for middle‐aged and older women: Implications for individual and community health and well‐being. Leisure Studies, 29(1), 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A., Tampubolon, G., & Savage, M. (2005). Recreation, informal social networks and social capital. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(4), 402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weare, C., Musso, J., & Jun, K. N. (2009). Cross-talk: The role of homophily and elite bias in civic associations. Social Forces, 88(1), 147–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, C., Cramer, K. J., Wagner, M. W., Alvarez, G., Friedland, L. A., Shah, D. V., … Franklin, C. (2017). When we stop talking politics: The maintenance and closing of conversation in contentious times. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 131–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., Sivakumar, G., & Xenos, M. A. (2017). It’s not cricket: Examining political discussion in nonpolitical online space. Information, Communication & Society, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar