#Family: Exploring the Display of Family and Family Leisure on Facebook and Instagram

References

• Bourdieu, P. (1990). Photography: A middle brow art, trans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Bach, B. W., Baxter, L. A., DiVerniero, R., Hammonds, J. R., Hosek, A. M., … Wolf, B. M. (2010). Constructing family: A typology of voluntary kin. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 388–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510361615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, J. (2013). Pew Internet: Social networking (full detail). Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Chalfen, R. (1987). Snapshot versions of life. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalfen, R. (1991). Turning leaves: The photographic collections of two Japanese American families. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, H. T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. Z., Kahn, D. L., & Steeves, R. H. (2000). Hermeneutic phenomenological research: A practical guide for nurse researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, A. L. (2013). “It's stuff that speaks to me”: Exploring the characteristics of digital possessions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1723–1734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, K. (2008). Informed consent in visual research. Seeking consent for the use of images obtained in photo elicitation: Reflections from the Living Resemblances project. Real Life Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/543/1/2008-07-toolkit-visual-consent.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Witt, L., & Ploeg, J. (2006). Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(2), 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. (2013). Photo and video sharing grow online. Pew Research Internet Project. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Photos%20and%20videos%20online_102813.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E., & Hart, J. (2004). Photographs as objects. In E. Edwards & J. Hart (Eds.), Photographs objects histories: On the materiality of images (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fasoli, L. (2003). Reading photographs of young children: Looking at practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), 32–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2003.4.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
   Google Scholar
• Fullagar, S. P., & Harrington, M. A. (2009). Negotiating the policy imperative to be healthy: Australian family repertoires of risk, leisure, and healthy lifestyles. Annals of Leisure Research, 12(2), 195–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2009.9686818
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. (2006). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, UK: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Gye, L. (2007). Picture this: The impact of mobile camera phones on personal photographic practices. Continuum, 21(2), 279–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310701269107
   Google Scholar
• Haines, K. M., Boyer, C. R., Giovanazzi, C., & Galupo, M. P. (2018). “Not a real family”: Microaggressions directed toward LGBTQ families. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(9), 1138–1151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1406217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallman, B. C., & Benbow, S. M. P. (2007). Family leisure, family photography and zoos: Exploring the emotional geographies of families. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(6), 871–888. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701712636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, M. (2013). Families, gender, social class, and leisure. In V. J. Freysinger, S. M. Shaw, K. A. Henderson, & M. D. Bialeschki (Eds.), Leisure, women, and gender (pp. 325–341). State College, PA: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, M. (2015). Practices and meaning of purposive family leisure among working- and middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 34(4), 471–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.938767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebblethwaite, S. (2015). Understanding ambivalence in family leisure among three-generation families: ‘It's all part of the package.’ Annals of Leisure Research, 18(3), 359–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2015.1063443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebblethwaite, S., Norris, J. (2010). “You don’t want to hurt his feelings …”: Family leisure as a context for intergenerational ambivalence. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(3), 489–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2010.11950214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbler, D. K., & Shinew, K. J. (2002). Interracial couples' experience of leisure: A social network approach. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Delamere, F. M., & Havitz, M. E. (2008). Experiences, perspectives, and meanings of family vacations for children. Leisure/Loisir, 32(2), 541–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2008.9651421
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, C., Bocarro, J. N., Henderson, K. A., Zabriskie, R., Parcel, T. L., & Kanters, M. A. (2015). Family leisure: An integrative review of research from select journals. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(5), 577–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2015-v47-i5-5705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2017). Mediated memory making: The virtual family photograph album. Communications, 42(3), 351–368.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., & Curtis, P. (2010). Family displays and personal lives. Sociology, 44(6), 1163–1180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510381612
   Google Scholar
• Janning, M., & Scalise, H. (2015). Gender and generation in the home curation of family photography. Journal of Family Issues, 36(12), 1702–1725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13500964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanes, R., & Magee, J. (2012). ‘Can we play on the swings and roundabouts?’: Creating inclusive play spaces for disabled young people and their families. Leisure Studies, 31(2), 193–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2011.589864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2014). Technologies of memory: Practices of remembering in analogue and digital photography. New Media & Society, 16(4), 576–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814532062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena, R., Jarvis, N., & Weeden, C. (2015). A review of gay and lesbian parented families’ travel motivations and destination choices: Gaps in research and future directions. Annals of Leisure Research, 18(2), 272–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2015.1040038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 129–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(4), 357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. H. J. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo‐sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. (2000). Taking the visual turn in research and scholarly communication key issues in developing a more visually literate (social) science. Visual Studies, 15(1), 7–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860008583812
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2003). Family photography and domestic spacings: A case study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(1), 5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvas, R., & Frohlich, D. M. (2011). From snapshots to social media-the changing picture of domestic photography. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Schänzel, H. A., & Lynch, P. A. (2016). Family perspectives on social hospitality dimensions while on holiday. Tourist Studies, 16(2), 133–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797615594742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. S. (2014). Facilitating physically active leisure for children who are overweight: mothers’ experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(4), 395–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharaievska, I. (2017). Updating the family operating system: A literature review of information communication technology and family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 39(5), 400–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1333058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M. (1997). Controversies and contradictions in family leisure: An analysis of conflicting paradigms. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(1), 98–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1997.11949785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M. (2008). Family leisure and changing ideologies of parenthood. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 688–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00076.x
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M., & Dawson, D. (2003). Contradictory aspects of family leisure: Idealization versus experience. Leisure/Loisir, 28(3–4), 179–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2003.9651312
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M., & Dawson, D. (2001). Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses on family activities. Leisure Sciences, 23(4), 217–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400152809098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the internet, and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Steers, M. L. N., Wickham, R. E., & Acitelli, L. K. (2014). Seeing everyone else's highlight reels: How Facebook usage is linked to depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(8), 701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell, D. E., & Shaw, S. M. (2007). “Daddy’s gone and he'll be back in October”: Farm women's experiences of family leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(2), 366–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell, D. E., & Shaw, S. M. (2009). Changing family life in the rural context: Women's perspectives of family leisure on the farm. Leisure Sciences, 31(5), 434–449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400903199468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2008). Digital photography: Communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication, 7(1), 57–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207084865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2013). ‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 199–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experiences: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, UK: The Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well‐being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, T. L., & Shannon, C. S. (2013). Doing more with less: Women's leisure during their partners’ military deployment. Leisure Sciences, 35(1), 63–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2013.739897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, J. (2013). Photography in the age of Facebook. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 6(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2003). Parent and child perspectives of family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(2), 163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2003.11949989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar