Digging Deeper: Engaging in Reflexivity in Interpretivist-Constructivist and Critical Leisure Research

References

• Anderson, E. (2015). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/feminism-epistemology/
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, E. B., & Ariely, D. (2009). The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateljevic, I., Harris, C., Wilson, E., & Collins, F. L. (2005). Getting ‘entangled’: Reflexivity and the ‘critical turn’ in tourism studies. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2005.11081469
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. (2003). Interviewing: Embodied communication. Feminism & Psychology, 13(2), 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, B. (2008). What’s the footballer doing here?” Racialized performativity, reflexivity, and identity. Cultural Studies? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 8(4), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708608321574
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. A. (2013). Reflections on reflexivity in leisure and tourism studies. Leisure Studies, 32(3), 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2012.662522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1996). What's in a name? Womanism, Black feminism, and beyond. The Black Scholar, 26(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.1996.11430765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, É. (2019). Deep reflexivity in tourism research. Tourism Geographies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2019.1571098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56(8), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267030568004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1995). The poststructural crisis in the social sciences: Learning from James Joyce. In R. H. Brown (Ed.), Postmodern representations: Truth, power, and mimesis in the human sciences and public culture (pp. 38–59). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage (4th Ed). Washington D.C.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, S. L. (1999). Naked truths: Towards a reflexive methodology in leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 21(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904099273282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), 169–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2006). Embodied knowledge: Writing researchers' bodies into qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305281944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2017). Embodiment in qualitative research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–131). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, M. F. (1998). Getting beyond marginality and ethnicity: The challenge for race and ethnic studies in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1998.11949816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, C. A. (1999). Researching race, reproducing racism. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 21(2), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1071441990210205
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. D. (2007). Ugly on the diamonds: An examination of white privilege in youth baseball. Leisure Sciences, 29 (2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400601160895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.583166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman-Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In Denzin, N. K. & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 763–791). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1990). Postmodern blackness. Postmodern Culture, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.1990.0004
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S. L., & Samdahl, D. M. (2000). Reflections on the “voice of authority” in leisure research and practice. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 23(1), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2000.10715611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. W. (2009). Writing ourselves at risk: Using self-narrative in working for social justice. Leisure Sciences, 31(5), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400903199815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2011). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In K. Hayes, S. R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 285–326). SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehner, A., Ploder, A., & Langer, P. C. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: European contributions to strong reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of Scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, P. C. (2016). The research vignette: Reflexive writing as interpretative representation of qualitative inquiry—a methodological proposition. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. J., & Scott, D. (2017). Racial discrimination and African Americans’ travel behavior: The utility of habitus and vignette technique. Journal of Travel Research, 56(3), 381.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. (2015). Introduction: hermeneutics and philosophy. In J. Malpas and H. H. Gander (Eds.), The Routledge companion to hermeneutics (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, C. (2001). Postcolonialism, feminism and development: intersections and dilemmas. Progress in Development Studies, 1(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340100100201
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2000). Beginning postcolonialism. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C., & Johnson, C. W. (2007). Contextualizing leisure research to encompass complexity in lived leisure experience: The need for creative analytic practice. Leisure Sciences, 29(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400601160721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C., & Shinew, K. J. (2004). The constraining impact of infertility on women's leisure lifestyles. Leisure Sciences, 26(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400490461972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 1(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, N. (2015). Emotional entanglements in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 53, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, P. (2018). Crafting qualitative research: Beyond positivist traditions (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 432–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Reimer-Kirkham, S., & Cochrane, M. (2009). Practicing awareness of embodiment in qualitative health research: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1642–1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spracklen, K. (2008). The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail: Myths of scientific racism and the pursuit of excellence in sport. Leisure Studies, 27(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360801902257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell, D. E., Paterson, S., Hebblethwaite, S., Xing, T. M., & Evans, M. (2017). Negotiating the complexities and risks of interdisciplinary qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917711351.
   Google Scholar