723
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Surveillance, Capitalism, Leisure, and Data: Being Watched, Giving, Becoming

, &
Pages 451-474 | Received 20 Jun 2022, Accepted 20 Mar 2023, Published online: 11 Apr 2023

References

  • Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3) https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142
  • Andrejevic, M. (2014). The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673–1689.
  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
  • Bratich, J. Z. (2022). On microfascism: Gender, death, and war. Common Notions.
  • Buchholz, K. (2022, April 29). Which countries spend the most time on social media? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/04/social-media-internet-connectivity/
  • Currier, D. (2003). Feminist technological futures: Deleuze and body/technology assemblages. Feminist Theory, 4(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001030043005
  • Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315242002
  • Doctorow, C. (2020, August 26). How to destroy ‘surveillance capitalism.’ OneZero. https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59
  • Dykstra, K., & Litwiller, F. (2021). “Are you trying to make them gay?”: Culture wars, anxieties about Genderplay, and the subsequent impacts on youth. Leisure Sciences, 43(3-4), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1830902
  • Esmonde, K., & Jette, S. (2020). Assembling the ‘Fitbit subject’: A Foucauldian-sociomaterialist examination of social class, gender and self-surveillance on Fitbit community message boards. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of. Health (London, England: 1997), 24(3), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459318800166
  • Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage Books ed). Vintage Books.
  • Fuchs, C. (2015). Surveillance and critical theory. Media and Communication, 3(2), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i2.207
  • Fuchs, C. (2017). Günther Anders’ undiscovered critical theory of technology in the age of big data capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 582–611. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.898
  • Galič, M., Timan, T., & Koops, B.-J. (2017). Bentham, deleuze and beyond: An overview of surveillance theories from the panopticon to participation. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0219-1
  • Gallant, K. A., & Yuen, F. (2021). Unraveling the research process: Humanizing leisure scholars. Leisure Sciences, 43(3-4), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1832633
  • Google Play. (2023, January 17). Elf on the Shelf Data Safety Information. Google Play Store. https://play.google.com/store/games?hl=en_US&gl=CA
  • Haraway, D. (2006). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 117–158). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3803-7_4
  • Harper, W. (1981). The experience of leisure. Leisure Sciences, 4(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408109512955
  • Hillman, V., & Esquivel, M. (2022, June 11). How Surveillance Capitalism Is Spreading to Schools. Progressive.Org. https://progressive.org/api/content/6ac9c2dc-e8fa-11ec-a11d-12274efc5439/
  • Iqbal, M. (2022, May 11). LinkedIn Usage and Revenue Statistics (2022). Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/linkedin-statistics/
  • Kayali, L., & Manancourt, V. (2021). Amazon fined €746M for violating privacy rules, Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/amazon-fined-e746m-for-violating-privacy-rules/
  • Kumm, B. E., & Johnson, C. W. (2017) Subversive imagination: smoothing space for leisure, identity, and politics. In Karl Spracklen, Brett Lashua, Erin Sharpe, & Spencer Swain (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of leisure theory (pp. 891–910). Palgrave.
  • Little, D. E. (2007). Conceptions of leisure constraints negotiation: A response to the Schneider and Wilhelm Stanis coping model. Leisure Sciences, 29(4), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701394923
  • Lodvdahl Gormsen, L., & Llanos, J. T. (2022). Facebook’s exploitative and exclusionary abuses in the two-sided market for social networks and display advertising. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 10(1), 90–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnab004
  • Lorimer, J. (2009). Posthumanism/posthumanistic geographies. In International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 344–354). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00723-9
  • Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726
  • Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. John Wiley & Sons.
  • McKeown, J. K. L., & Miller, M. C. (2020). #tableforone: Exploring representations of dining out alone on Instagram. Annals of Leisure Research, 1–20, 23(5), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2019.1613245
  • Miles, J. (2021, April 30). In the absence of user-level data, contextual targeting will become mainstream—AdNews. https://www.adnews.com.au/news/in-the-absence-of-user-level-data-contextual-targeting-will-become-mainstream
  • Mosco, V. (2015). To the cloud. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315631554
  • Mowatt, R. A. (2022). The geographies of threat and the production of violence: The state and the city between us. Routledge.
  • Nichols, E., Pavlidis, A., & Nowak, R. (2021). “It’s like lifting the power”: Powerlifting, digital gendered subjectivities, and the politics of multiplicity. Leisure Sciences, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021.1945982
  • Noble, S. U. (2018a). Critical surveillance literacy in social media: Interrogating black death and dying online. Black Camera, 9(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2979/blackcamera.9.2.10
  • Noble, S. U. (2018b). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
  • Owens, J., & Cribb, A. (2019). ‘My fitbit thinks I can do better!’ do health promoting wearable technologies support personal autonomy? Philosophy & Technology, 32(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0266-2
  • Papadopoulos, P., Kourtellis, N., & Markatos, E. (2019). Cookie Synchronization: Everything You Always Wanted to Know But Were Afraid to Ask [Paper presentation].The World Wide Web Conference on - WWW ‘19, 1432–1442. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313542
  • Parker, B. (2021, October 9). LinkedIn Business Model (2022)| How does LinkedIn make money? Business Strategy Hub. https://bstrategyhub.com/linkedin-business-model-how-does-linkedin-make-money/
  • Parks, L. (2015). Stuff you can kick”: Toward a theory of media infrastructures. In P. Svensson & D. Goldberg (Eds.), Between humanities and the digital (pp. 355–373). MIT Press.
  • Pedersen, I., & Iliadis, A. (2020). Embodied computing: Wearables, implantables, embeddables, ingestibles. MIT Press.
  • Pinckney, IV, H. P., Mowatt, R. A., Outley, C., Brown, A., Floyd, M. F., & Black,, K. L. (2018). Black spaces/white spaces: Black lives, leisure, and life politics. Leisure Sciences, 40(4), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1454361
  • Pinto, L. E., & Nemorin, S. (2014). Who’s the Boss? The “Elf on the Shelf” and the normalization of surveillance. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/who%E2%80%99s-boss
  • Pinto, L. E., & Nemorin, S. (2015). Normalizing panoptic surveillance among children: “The elf on the shelf. Our Schools/Our Selves, 24(2), 53–61.
  • Ringeval, M., Wagner, G., Denford, J., Paré, G., & Kitsiou, S. (2020). Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e23954. https://doi.org/10.2196/23954
  • Ritzer, G. (2015). Prosumer capitalism. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 413–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12105
  • Ritzer, G., Dean, P., & Jurgenson, N. (2012). The coming of age of the prosumer. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211429368
  • Schultz, C., & Rose, J. (2022). Parting thoughts V. Leisure Sciences, 44(1), 138–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2022.2014138
  • Scott, D. M. (2015). Social networking as marketing. In The new rules of marketing and PR: How to use social media, online video, mobile applications, blogs, news releases, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly (pp. 259–294). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Silk, M., Millington, B., Rich, E., & Bush, A. (2016). (Re-)thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2016.1240223
  • Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the Internet and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Taplin, J. (2017). Move fast and break things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon cornered culture and undermined democracy. Little, Brown.
  • Tavares, F., Silva, A., A., Ferreira, G. G. T., Tavares, M. R., & de Miranda, R. M. (2017). The “green consumption” and the rhizomatic capital strategy: Ads and reports in the Brazilian media. Advances in Applied Sociology, 07(02), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2017.72003
  • Tuttle, K. (2012, December 6). You’re a Creepy One, Elf on the Shelf. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/youre-a-creepy-one-elf-on-the-shelf/266002/
  • Whitson, J. R. (2014). Foucault’s fitbit: Governance and gamification. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world—Approaches, issues, applications (Vol. 1–Book, Section, pp. 339–358). MIT Press.
  • Wong, D., Amon, K. L., & Keep, M. (2019). Desire to belong affects instagram behavior and perceived social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 22(7), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0533
  • Yee, N. (2014). The proteus paradox: How online games and virtual worlds change us? And how they don’t. Yale University Press.
  • Zuboff, S. (2015a). The Secrets of Surveillance Capitalism. Frankfurter Allgemeine. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/shoshana-zuboff-secrets-ofsurveillance- capitalism-14103616.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2
  • Zuboff, S. (2015b). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (1st ed.). PublicAffairs.
  • Zulli, D. (2018). Capitalizing on the look: Insights into the glance, attention economy, and Instagram. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 35(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2017.1394582

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.