Modeling Uncertainty in Photogrammetry-Derived National Shoreline

References

• Alfugura, A., L. Billa, and B. Pradhan. 2011. Semi-automated procedures for shoreline extraction using single RADARSAT-1 SAR image. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 95(4): 395–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applanix, 2014. POSPac MMS. Available at http://www.applanix.com/products/airborne/pospac-mms.html. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boak, E.H. and I.L. Turner. 2005. Shoreline definition and detection: A review. Journal of Coastal Research 21(4): 688–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, L. 2005. An uncertainty model for the tidal constituent and residual interpolation (TCARI) method of water level correction. MS Thesis. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C.H., D.J. Benson, and D.E. Guy, Jr. 1981. Shore protection structures: Effects on recession rates and beaches from the 1870s to the 1970s along the Ohio shore of Lake Erie. Environmental Geology 3: 353–362.
   Google Scholar
• Cisternelli, M. and S. Gill. 2005. Implementation of TCARI into NOS Hydrographic Survey Operations. U.S. Hydro Conference, San Diego, CA March 2931.
   Google Scholar
• Coastal Services Center. 2014. Digital Coast, Coastal Lidar. Available at https://csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/data/ coastallidar. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• CO-OPS. 2014. Hydrographic survey and shoreline mapping survey support. Available at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa. gov/hydro.html. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dieck, R.H. 2002. Measurement Uncertainty: Methods and Applications. 3rd ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W.M. and S.K. Gill. 1999. Tides and water level requirements for NOS hydrographic surveys. International Hydrographic Review 76: 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, D., M. Sault, and J. Bailey. 2003. National ocean service shoreline—past, present, and future. Journal of Coastal Research SI(38): 14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, K., R. Schmalz, C. Zervas, and W. Collier. 1999. Tidal constituent and residual interpolation (TCARI): A new method for the tidal correction of bathymetric data. Technical report, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization. 2008. IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys. 5th ed. Monaco: International Hydrographic Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Leatherman, S.P. and F.J. Anders. 1999. Mapping and managing coastal erosion hazards in New York. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue No. 28: 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., R. Ma, and K. Di. 2002. Digital tide-coordinated shoreline. Marine Geodesy 25(1/2): 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, R.A. and F.M. Speed. 1998. Evaluation of shorelines and legal boundaries controlled by water levels on sandy beaches. Journal of Coastal Research 14(4): 1373–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Geodetic Survey. 2014a. Remote sensing division coastal mapping program. Available at http://www.ngs.noaa. gov/RSD/cmp.shtml. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Geodetic Survey. 2014b. Coastal and shoreline change analysis program. Available at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/ RSD/cscap.shtml. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• NOAA. 2010. Technical considerations for use of geospatial data in sea level change mapping and assessment. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, NOAA Technical Report NOS 2010-01.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Coast Survey. 2014a. Datums and transformations. Available at http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/csdl/ learn_datum.html. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Coast Survey. 2014b. Tidal corrector application (TCARI). Available at http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/csdl/tcari.html. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Coast Survey. 2014c. Field procedures manual. Available at http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/hsd/fpm/ FPM_2013_Final_5_3_13.pdf. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Coast Survey. 2014d. Chart 13394. Available at http://www.charts.noaa.gov/OnLineViewer/13394.shtml. Last accessed 8 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pajak, M.J. and S.P. Leatherman. 2002. The high water line as shoreline indicator. Journal of Coastal Research 18(2): 329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, C. and H. Yeung. 2001. Uncertainty estimation and Monte Carlo simulation method. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 12: 291–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, C.E., M. Sault, S.A. White, and J. Sellars. 2005. Empirical analysis of aerial camera filters for shoreline mapping. Proceedings of the ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference, 7–11 March, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Sabins, F.F. 1986. Remote Sensing: Principles and Interpretation. 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shalowitz, A.L. 1964. Shore and sea boundaries. U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.T. Jr. 1978. NOS photographic operations for photobathymetry. Proceedings Coastal Mapping Symposium, American Society of Photogrammetry, 14–16 August, Rockville, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G.L. and G.A. Zarillo. 1990. Calculating long-term shoreline recession rates using aerial photographic and beach profiling techniques. Journal of Coastal Research 6(1): 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, D.B. and J. Langfelder. 1971. Air photo survey of coastal erosion. Photogrammetric Engineering 37(6): 565–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdon, H.F., A.H. Sallenger, J.H. List, and R.A. Holman. 2002. Estimation of shoreline position and change using airborne topographic Lidar data. Journal of Coastal Research 18: 502–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieler, E.R., E.A. Himmelstoss, J.L. Zichichi, and A. Ergul. 2009. Digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) version 4.0—an ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1278.
   Google Scholar
• White, S.A., C.E. Parrish, B.R. Calder, S. Pe’eri, and Y. Rzhanov. 2011. Lidar-derived national shoreline: Empirical and stochastic uncertainty analyses. Journal of Coastal Research SI(62): 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard, J.W., M. Aslaksen, J.L.T. Longenecker, and A. Ryerson. 2003. Shoreline mapping from airborne LiDAR in Shilshole Bay, Washington. Proceedings of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Ocean Service (NOS), U.S. Hydrographic Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, X.X. and X.P. Zhang. 2008. Theoretical accuracy of direct georeferencing with position and orientation system in aerial photogrammetry. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 3–11 July, Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.P. and X.X. Yuan. 2008. Effects of exterior orientation elements on direct georeferencing in POS-supported aerial photogrammetry. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 25–27 June, Shanghai.
   Google Scholar