Accurate Acoustic Signal Parameter Estimation for Marine Geodesy Surveys

References

• Bendat, J. S. and A. G. Piersol. 2011. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwell, C. D. and A. D. Sweeney. 2010. Acoustic ray-trace equations for seafloor geodesy. Marine Geodesy 33(2–3):164–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debese, N., N. Seube, and L. Heydel. 2012. Qualitative and quantitative description of multibeam echosounder systematic errors on rocky areas. Marine Geodesy 35(3):306–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, S. W. and G. A. Hampson. 2002. A subspace-tracking approach to interference nulling for phased array-based radio telescopes. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation 50(1):25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenn, A. J. 1990. Near-field testing of adaptive radar systems. The Lincoln Laboratory Journal 3(1):23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, L. J., P. M. Techau, J. S. Bergin, and K. L. Bell. 2000. Space-time adaptive processing in airborne radar systems. Proceeding of the IEEE 2000 International Radar Conference, Alexandria, VA, 711–716.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X. H., S. W. Wang, Y. Zhou, X. Li, and C. S. Zheng. 2011. Robustness analysis of time-domain and frequency-domain adaptive null-forming schemes. Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, Singapore, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, J. Y. 2011. Underwater Acoustic Channel. Harbin, China: Harbin Engineering University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janice, B. A. 2011, August. Differential near-field holography for small antenna arrays. MS Thesis. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Landon, J., B. D. Jeffs, and K. F. Warnick. 2012. Model-based subspace projection beamforming for deep interference nulling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 60(3):1215–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky, M., R. D. Doolittle, B. D. Simmons, and S. G. Lemon. 2004. Recent progress in towed hydrophone array research. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 29(2):374–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. H., S. Q. Li, C. Y. Sun, and H. B. Yu. 2007. The interference characteristics of platform and towed body noise in shallow water for active/passive towed array sonar. ACTA ACUSTICA 32(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, F. L., J. Yang, C. Pavlovic, and A. Nehorial. 2002. Adaptive null-forming scheme in digital hearing aids. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing 50(7):129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. L., M. A. Liu, Z. B. Zhong, and L. Tong. 2002. Response of the towered line array to the noise of the tow ship in shallow water. ACTA ACUSTICA 27(6):481–486.
   Google Scholar
• Murino, V. and A. Trucco. 2000. Three-dimensional iamge generation and processing in underwater acoustic vision. Proceedings of the IEEE 88(12):1903–1948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmese, M. and A. Trucco. 2006. Acoustic imaging of underwater embedded objects: Signal simulation for three-dimensional sonar instrumentation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 55(4):1339–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, G. A., L. I. Lobkovsky, R. Kh. Mazova, I. A. Garagash, V. Karastathis, L. Yu. Kataeva, and V. G. Kaz'min. 2007. Numerical modeling of sediment mass sliding and tsunami generation: The case of February 7, 1963, in Corinth Gulf, Greece. Marine Geodesy 30(4):315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, V. S., K. Srivastava, and V. P. Dimri. 2011. Tsunami propagation and inundation due to tsunamigenic earthquakes in the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone: Impact at Visakhapatnam. Marine Geodesy 34(1):48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. P., T. S. Murty, B. K. Rastogi, and R. B. S. Yadav. 2012. Earthquake generated tsunami in the Indian Ocean and probable vulnerability assessment for the East Coast of India. Marine Geodesy 35(1):49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, J. L. 1979. Underwater acoustic imaging. Proceedings of the IEEE 67(4):554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucco, A. 1998. A least-squares approximation for the delays used in focused beamforming. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104(1):171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veen, B. D., and K. M. Buckley. 1988. Beamforming: A versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 5(2):4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Van Trees, H. L. 2002. Detection, Estimation and Modulation, Part IV: Optimum Array Processing. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. 1995. Space-Time adaptive processing for airborne radar. Proceeding of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, London, 2809–2812.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. L., J. Chen, Z. Bao, and Y. Peng. 2003. Robust space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar in nonhomogeneous clutter environment. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 39(1):70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, M. C., M. Rangaswamy, R. Adve, and T. B. Hale. 2006. Space-time adaptive processing: A knowledge-based perspective for airborne radar. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 23(1):51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., J. D. Mei, C. P. Zhai, and J. Y. Hui. 2009. Sea trial research on the measurements of passive source space distribution imaging and positioning. ACTA ACUSTICA 34(2):103–109.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., J. D. Mei, A. Zielinski, and P. Cai. 2013. Passive marine mammal monitoring based on underwater acoustic imaging. Proceeding of 1st International Conference and Exhibition on Underwater Acoustics, Corfu, Greece, 1205–1212.
   Google Scholar