Model for the Processing and Estimation of Dual Frequency Echo Sounder Observations in Detailed Bathymetries

References

• Abramowitz, M., and I. A. Stegun. 1972. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 1998. Hydrographic Surveying (Technical Engineering and Design Guides as Adapted from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, No. 25). Reston: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Bollinger, J. 2006. Las Bandas de Bollinger. Barcelona: Valor Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Bottelier, P., R. Haagmans, and N. Kinneging. 2000. Fast reduction of high density multibeam echosounder data for near real-time applicatons. The Hydrographic Journal 98:23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brekhovskikh, L. M., and Y. P. Lysanov. 1991. Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Berlin , Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, B. R. and L. A. Mayer. 2003. Automatic processing of high-rate, high-density multibeam echosounder data. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4(6):1–22. doi: 10.1029/2002GC000486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debese, N. 1997. Typologie des erreus les plus courantes sur les sondes des sondeurs multifaisceaux Simrad et leur impact sur la qualité des produits, Tech, Rep No 007/97. Paris: Ministère de la Défense, Service hydrographique et océanographique de la marine.
   Google Scholar
• Debese, N. 2007. Multibeam echosounder data cleaning through an adaptive surface-based approach. Paper, U.S. Hydro 2007, Norfolk, May 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Debese, N. R. Moitié, and N. Seube. 2012. Multibeam echosounder data cleaning through a hierarchic adaptive and robust local surfacing. Computers & Geosciences 46:330–339.doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg. J. 1995. On the identification of spikes in soundings. International Hydrographic Review 72(1):33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Eleftherakis, D., A. Amiri-Simkooei, M. Snellen, and D. G. Simons. 2012. Improving riverbed sediment classification using backscatter and depth residual features of multi-beam echo-sounder systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(5):3710–3725. doi: 10.1121/1.3699206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleftherakis, D., M. Snellen, A. Amiri-Simkooei, D. G. Simons, and K. Siemes. 2014. Observations regarding coarse sediment classification based on multi-beam echo sounder's backscatter strength and depth residuals in Dutch rivers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135(6):3305–3315.doi: 10.1121/1.4875236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R., E. Fumagalli, M. Caccia, and G. Bruzzone. 2015. Seabed classification using a single beam echosounder. Paper, Oceans 2015, Genova, May 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gosciewski, D. 2014. Reduction of deformations of the digital terrain model by merging interpolation algorithms. Computers & Geosciences 64:61–71. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellequin, L. 1998. Statistical characterization of multibeam echosounder data. Paper, Oceans 1998, Nice, September 28–October 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes Clarke, J. 2000. Present-day Methods of Depth Measurement. Continental Shelf Limits: The Scientific and Legal Interface. P. Cook, and C. Carlton (eds.), 139–159. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., X. Huang, and W. Zheng. 2006. Black–Scholes' Model and Bollinger bands. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 131(5):565–571. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2006.03.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, D., H. Li, Y. Wei, and T. Zhou. 2010. Automatic outlier detection in multibeam bathymetric data using robust LTS. Paper, 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), Yantai, October 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lubnau, T. and N. Todorova. 2015. Trading on mean-reversion in energy futures markets. Energy and Economics 51:312–319. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacQueen, J. B. 1967. Some methods for classification an analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics Statistics and Probability. L. M. Le Cam, and J. Neyman (eds.), Vol. 1, pp 281–297. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maleika, W. 2013. The influence of track configuration and multibeam echosounder parameters on the accuracy of seabed DTMs obtained in shallow water. Earth Science Informatics 6(2):139–159. doi: 10.1007/s12145-013-0111-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleika, W. 2015. The influence of the grid resolution on the accuracy of the digital terrain model used in seabed modeling. Marine Geophysical Research 36(1):35–44. doi: 10.1007/s11001-014-9236-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereda, R., E. Castillo López, R. Ferrer Torio, J. M. Sánchez Espeso, J. M. de Luis Ruiz, and M. L. Ruiz Bedia. 2004. Definición y validación de un modelo para el movimiento de arfada en trabajos batimétricos de alta precisión. Paper, 4a Asamblea Hispano-Portuguesa de Geodesia y Geofísica - 4a Assembleia Luso-Espanhola de Geodesia e Geofísica, Lisbon, February 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2002. Engineering and Design: Hydrographic Surveying (Engineer Manual 1110-2-1003). Washington DC: USACE.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C., W. Knight, and D. Wells. 1991. Memory intensive statistical algorithms for multibeam bathymetric data. Computers & Geosciences 17(7):985–993. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(91)90093-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar